H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Daria Kasatkina vs Natalia Vikhlyantseva H2H: 1-1
Daria Kasatkina and Natalia Vikhlyantseva are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Daria Kasatkina won the 2017 Beijing second round 7-6(5) 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 29
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 29
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 21, 2020 | Doha | WTA 1000 | Q1 | Hard | Daria Kasatkina | 6-7(7) 6-4 4-0 (ret.) | Natalia Vikhlyantseva | Match data |
| Feb 15, 2020 | Dubai | WTA 1000 | Q1 | Hard | Daria Kasatkina | 6-3 6-2 | Natalia Vikhlyantseva | Match data |
| Sep 30, 2017 | Beijing | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Daria Kasatkina | 7-6(5) 6-1 | Natalia Vikhlyantseva | Match data |
| Feb 3, 2017* | St. Petersburg | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Natalia Vikhlyantseva | 7-6(4) 6-2 | Daria Kasatkina | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daria Kasatkina | #63 | #8 | 3,525 | 1,988 | 316 | 224 | 58.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 2 | 8 |
| Natalia Vikhlyantseva | #1,034 | #54 | 1,070 | 1,693 | 34 | 56 | 37.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Daria Kasatkina | Natalia Vikhlyantseva | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #354 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2015 | 7–5 | 58.3% | #75 | 1,610 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #237 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2016 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #26 | 1,725 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #132 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2017 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #24 | 1,848 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #56 | 1,652 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2018 | 40–23 | 63.5% | #10 | 1,893 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 5–17 | 22.7% | #134 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2019 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #70 | 1,756 | 0 | 2 | 2019 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #115 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2020 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #72 | 1,774 | 0 | 2 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #145 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2021 | 37–19 | 66.1% | #26 | 1,842 | 0 | 4 | 2021 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #195 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2022 | 41–22 | 65.1% | #8 | 1,908 | 0 | 6 | 2022 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #382 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2023 | 41–25 | 62.1% | #18 | 1,914 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2024 | 42–23 | 64.6% | #9 | 1,929 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2025 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #37 | 1,781 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2026 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #63 | 1,779 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |