H2H data updated: 2026-10-17 00:00 UTC
Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Daria Kasatkina vs Viktorija Golubic.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daria Kasatkina | 4-6 7-6(3) 6-4 | Viktorija Golubic | Match data | Oct 10, 2026 | Q1 | Wuhan Open | WTA 1000 | Hard |
1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daria Kasatkina | #82 | #8 | 3,525 | 1,989 | 324 | 235 | 58.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 2 | 8 |
| Viktorija Golubic | #72 | #35 | 1,531 | 1,829 | 120 | 145 | 45.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Daria Kasatkina | Viktorija Golubic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #354 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2015 | 7–5 | 58.3% | #75 | 1,610 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2016 | 32–21 | 60.4% | #26 | 1,756 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2017 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #24 | 1,854 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #196 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2018 | 42–24 | 63.6% | #10 | 1,899 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #205 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2019 | 13–21 | 38.2% | #70 | 1,750 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2020 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #72 | 1,772 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 18–11 | 62.1% | #56 | 1,676 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2021 | 37–19 | 66.1% | #26 | 1,840 | 0 | 4 | 2017 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #114 | 1,628 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2022 | 41–22 | 65.1% | #8 | 1,908 | 0 | 6 | 2018 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #104 | 1,577 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2023 | 41–25 | 62.1% | #18 | 1,897 | 0 | 6 | 2019 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #80 | 1,651 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2024 | 42–23 | 64.6% | #9 | 1,922 | 0 | 8 | 2020 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #138 | 1,593 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2025 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #37 | 1,778 | 0 | 8 | 2021 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #43 | 1,739 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2026 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #82 | 1,745 | 0 | 8 | 2022 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #76 | 1,719 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #83 | 1,647 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #90 | 1,760 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #82 | 1,790 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #72 | 1,774 | 0 | 2 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Daria Kasatkina | Viktorija Golubic | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | |||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 17 | 2014 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2015 | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2016 | 23 | 15 | 38 | 60.5% | 7 | 4 | 11 | 63.6% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2017 | 22 | 16 | 38 | 57.9% | 8 | 4 | 12 | 66.7% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 2013 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2018 | 23 | 14 | 37 | 62.2% | 12 | 7 | 19 | 63.2% | 7 | 3 | 10 | 70.0% | 2014 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2019 | 9 | 15 | 24 | 37.5% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2020 | 5 | 9 | 14 | 35.7% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 9 | 8 | 17 | 52.9% | 7 | 2 | 9 | 77.8% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% |
| 24 | 2021 | 25 | 11 | 36 | 69.4% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 7 | 3 | 10 | 70.0% | 2017 | 7 | 10 | 17 | 41.2% | 1 | 6 | 7 | 14.3% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 25 | 2022 | 25 | 15 | 40 | 62.5% | 12 | 5 | 17 | 70.6% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 2018 | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 26 | 2023 | 23 | 16 | 39 | 59.0% | 12 | 6 | 18 | 66.7% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% | 2019 | 7 | 8 | 15 | 46.7% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% |
| 27 | 2024 | 26 | 17 | 43 | 60.5% | 8 | 4 | 12 | 66.7% | 8 | 2 | 10 | 80.0% | 2020 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2025 | 12 | 13 | 25 | 48.0% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 2021 | 12 | 9 | 21 | 57.1% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 7 | 4 | 11 | 63.6% |
| 29 | 2026 | 5 | 12 | 17 | 29.4% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 2022 | 9 | 10 | 19 | 47.4% | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 2 | 7 | 9 | 22.2% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 9 | 8 | 17 | 52.9% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 9 | 11 | 20 | 45.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 6 | 8 | 14 | 42.9% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% |
| Career | — | 203 | 156 | 359 | 56.5% | 82 | 55 | 137 | 59.9% | 39 | 24 | 63 | 61.9% | — | 73 | 89 | 162 | 45.1% | 22 | 33 | 55 | 40.0% | 25 | 23 | 48 | 52.1% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 516/561 of Daria Kasatkina's and 250/265 of Viktorija Golubic's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Daria Kasatkina | Viktorija Golubic | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 17 | 2014 | 1/1 | 1.0 | 3.0 | 53.3% | 37.5% | 38.1% | 40.0% | 20.0% | 37.8% | 44.7% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2015 | 6/12 | 1.5 | 1.7 | 69.5% | 61.2% | 54.3% | 60.1% | 36.4% | 59.1% | 40.4% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2016 | 44/53 | 2.0 | 3.2 | 62.9% | 62.1% | 47.3% | 49.9% | 51.8% | 56.7% | 46.2% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2017 | 50/52 | 1.3 | 2.8 | 68.2% | 58.9% | 47.2% | 50.6% | 47.7% | 54.9% | 46.5% | 2013 | 2/2 | 1.0 | 4.5 | 55.2% | 73.4% | 46.9% | 58.3% | 47.2% | 61.7% | 38.4% |
| 21 | 2018 | 61/66 | 1.4 | 4.6 | 68.6% | 60.2% | 43.5% | 50.4% | 52.4% | 54.8% | 48.1% | 2014 | 2/2 | 0.0 | 4.0 | 63.3% | 54.9% | 33.1% | 37.1% | 55.8% | 47.0% | 54.7% |
| 22 | 2019 | 32/34 | 1.0 | 6.4 | 64.8% | 57.0% | 37.9% | 45.7% | 48.4% | 50.2% | 45.0% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2020 | 20/20 | 1.0 | 4.3 | 69.2% | 57.0% | 38.5% | 38.7% | 48.0% | 51.5% | 47.3% | 2016 | 28/29 | 0.8 | 2.8 | 67.8% | 58.2% | 50.1% | 47.4% | 46.4% | 55.6% | 46.5% |
| 24 | 2021 | 55/57 | 2.0 | 3.4 | 64.6% | 63.8% | 42.4% | 49.5% | 49.3% | 56.2% | 47.3% | 2017 | 26/26 | 1.0 | 3.7 | 66.0% | 57.1% | 45.1% | 48.9% | 47.8% | 52.9% | 43.8% |
| 25 | 2022 | 61/63 | 1.4 | 3.9 | 68.5% | 62.4% | 40.7% | 54.2% | 53.1% | 55.6% | 48.8% | 2018 | 13/13 | 0.8 | 5.2 | 62.6% | 59.3% | 39.1% | 50.7% | 41.1% | 51.7% | 43.9% |
| 26 | 2023 | 64/66 | 1.0 | 3.5 | 75.4% | 60.0% | 40.4% | 53.4% | 51.5% | 54.9% | 48.3% | 2019 | 25/25 | 0.6 | 4.3 | 65.4% | 54.2% | 41.8% | 55.5% | 61.5% | 50.1% | 47.0% |
| 27 | 2024 | 63/65 | 1.7 | 5.0 | 65.8% | 61.6% | 42.0% | 50.6% | 51.9% | 54.9% | 47.7% | 2020 | 3/3 | 0.7 | 6.7 | 58.6% | 61.8% | 35.2% | 49.4% | 28.9% | 50.4% | 39.6% |
| 28 | 2025 | 29/40 | 1.8 | 5.7 | 67.4% | 58.6% | 40.0% | 45.7% | 49.9% | 52.4% | 47.4% | 2021 | 34/36 | 0.6 | 2.1 | 70.3% | 61.2% | 45.0% | 54.1% | 46.5% | 56.5% | 46.2% |
| 29 | 2026 | 30/32 | 2.1 | 6.6 | 68.2% | 57.7% | 37.4% | 50.2% | 50.5% | 51.3% | 45.7% | 2022 | 36/37 | 0.6 | 2.4 | 67.9% | 56.8% | 42.8% | 48.0% | 51.8% | 52.4% | 44.4% |
| 30 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 16/16 | 0.6 | 2.6 | 66.9% | 59.0% | 42.3% | 49.6% | 41.4% | 53.8% | 39.8% |
| 31 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 23/25 | 0.6 | 2.0 | 70.3% | 56.5% | 44.4% | 43.8% | 52.2% | 52.7% | 43.6% |
| 32 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 15/24 | 0.4 | 2.7 | 68.8% | 58.6% | 44.1% | 45.7% | 49.0% | 54.3% | 41.1% |
| 33 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 27/27 | 1.1 | 2.5 | 68.6% | 58.5% | 46.6% | 50.3% | 49.6% | 54.8% | 45.4% |
| Career | — | 516/561 | 1.5 | 4.2 | 67.8% | 60.4% | 42.2% | 50.2% | 50.6% | 54.5% | 47.3% | — | 250/265 | 0.7 | 3.0 | 67.5% | 58.1% | 44.3% | 49.6% | 49.2% | 53.6% | 44.6% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Daria Kasatkina | Viktorija Golubic | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 17 | 2014 | 1493 | 98.5 | -1.86 | +0.28 | 0.718 | 42.3% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.50 | — | — | — | -0.02 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2015 | 1610 | 124.4 | +0.87 | -0.47 | 0.987 | 49.7% | -8 | -55 | — | 53.3% | +0.27 | 4–2 (67%) | 0–1 | — | -0.31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2016 | 1757 | 143.6 | +0.17 | +2.83 | 1.067 | 51.4% | +1 | -113 | -136 | 59.1% | +0.59 | 10–11 (48%) | 4–3 (57%) | 102.1 | +0.78 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2017 | 1854 | 147.3 | -0.76 | +3.22 | 1.031 | 50.6% | -11 | -98 | — | 56.9% | +0.46 | 10–4 (71%) | 6–8 (43%) | 105.8 | -1.07 | 2013 | 1506 | 100.5 | +0.18 | -2.72 | 1.003 | 50.4% | — | — | — | 60.0% | -0.20 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.07 |
| 21 | 2018 | 1899 | 148.7 | -0.84 | +5.02 | 1.065 | 51.3% | +7 | -85 | -146 | 59.2% | +0.56 | 16–8 (67%) | 10–6 (63%) | 108.2 | -0.04 | 2014 | 1516 | 104.8 | +0.79 | -1.20 | 1.032 | 51.1% | — | — | — | 50.0% | +0.67 | 1–1 | — | — | -0.09 |
| 22 | 2019 | 1751 | 134.0 | -4.36 | +2.17 | 0.902 | 47.6% | +23 | +51 | — | 39.5% | -1.00 | 4–6 (40%) | 4–3 (57%) | 98.3 | -0.32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2020 | 1773 | 138.1 | -3.24 | +3.53 | 0.976 | 49.3% | -2 | +29 | — | 43.5% | -0.20 | 4–4 (50%) | 0–1 | — | -0.90 | 2016 | 1677 | 125.7 | -0.61 | +2.42 | 1.046 | 50.8% | -58 | -11 | -26 | 56.1% | +0.50 | 7–5 (58%) | 5–6 (45%) | 102.5 | -0.96 |
| 24 | 2021 | 1841 | 146.0 | -0.32 | +4.02 | 1.081 | 51.6% | +11 | -66 | 0 | 57.7% | +0.68 | 17–7 (71%) | 4–2 (67%) | 107.3 | -0.91 | 2017 | 1628 | 111.6 | -2.61 | +0.22 | 0.929 | 48.3% | -1 | -75 | — | 39.7% | -0.40 | 7–9 (44%) | 1–5 (17%) | 94.2 | -0.52 |
| 25 | 2022 | 1909 | 153.6 | -0.53 | +5.97 | 1.100 | 52.2% | -25 | +16 | -53 | 59.0% | +0.80 | 13–6 (68%) | 4–8 (33%) | 100.6 | -1.84 | 2018 | 1578 | 108.9 | -3.22 | -1.05 | 0.909 | 47.7% | +18 | -36 | — | 33.3% | -0.88 | 2–5 (29%) | 1–5 (17%) | 91.6 | +0.92 |
| 26 | 2023 | 1897 | 149.9 | -1.19 | +5.38 | 1.072 | 51.5% | -7 | +43 | +22 | 58.3% | +0.45 | 10–8 (56%) | 7–8 (47%) | 99.7 | +2.71 | 2019 | 1651 | 110.5 | -5.01 | +1.79 | 0.941 | 48.5% | +14 | -170 | +1 | 46.8% | -0.42 | 5–7 (42%) | 5–6 (45%) | 97.7 | +0.40 |
| 27 | 2024 | 1923 | 147.4 | -1.36 | +4.68 | 1.058 | 51.2% | -35 | +3 | +127 | 56.6% | +0.36 | 17–8 (68%) | 7–6 (54%) | 101.4 | +1.03 | 2020 | 1593 | 112.9 | -1.93 | -1.00 | 0.798 | 44.8% | +16 | — | — | 25.0% | -1.50 | 0–2 | 0–2 | — | +0.19 |
| 28 | 2025 | 1778 | 144.4 | -3.28 | +3.13 | 0.996 | 49.8% | +8 | +91 | +197 | 50.0% | +0.31 | 5–9 (36%) | 1–4 (20%) | 91.8 | +2.06 | 2021 | 1739 | 137.0 | -0.30 | +2.74 | 1.062 | 51.3% | -47 | -136 | +50 | 54.8% | +0.27 | 6–8 (43%) | 6–3 (67%) | 101.8 | -0.76 |
| 29 | 2026 | 1746 | 133.7 | -4.05 | +2.65 | 0.938 | 48.6% | -11 | +154 | +94 | 42.9% | -0.51 | 4–11 (27%) | 4–8 (33%) | 88.8 | -0.17 | 2022 | 1720 | 131.4 | -2.91 | +1.24 | 0.932 | 48.4% | +18 | -133 | +30 | 47.7% | -0.42 | 6–10 (38%) | 4–5 (44%) | 96.1 | -0.60 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 1647 | 111.3 | -2.48 | -1.86 | 0.862 | 46.9% | +28 | — | +120 | 35.3% | -1.27 | 0–2 | 2–3 (40%) | — | +0.06 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 1761 | 124.5 | -2.53 | +0.72 | 0.922 | 48.2% | +35 | -253 | -30 | 42.1% | -0.79 | 5–4 (56%) | 5–3 (63%) | 102.6 | -1.14 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 1790 | 129.7 | -1.72 | -1.14 | 0.899 | 47.9% | +26 | -241 | — | 44.4% | -0.37 | 7–8 (47%) | 4–3 (57%) | 97.5 | -1.22 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 1775 | 135.9 | -1.74 | +2.02 | 1.005 | 50.1% | -31 | -93 | +65 | 50.0% | +0.22 | 6–4 (60%) | 1–5 (17%) | 99.9 | +0.32 |
| Career | — | 1990 | 151.1 | -1.38 | +4.12 | 1.039 | 50.8% | -6 | -7 | +10 | 54.8% | +0.34 | 114–84 (58%) | 51–58 (47%) | 100.2 | +0.18 | — | 1829 | 129.4 | -2.17 | +1.02 | 0.960 | 49.1% | -2 | -107 | +35 | 46.4% | -0.27 | 52–66 (44%) | 34–46 (43%) | 91.2 | -1.26 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Madison Keys | 2 | 10 | 12 | Jan 9, 2025 | H2H |
| Paula Badosa | 5 | 5 | 10 | Oct 1, 2026 | H2H |
| Aryna Sabalenka | 2 | 8 | 10 | May 30, 2026 | H2H |
| Irina-Camelia Begu | 9 | 1 | 10 | Jul 3, 2025 | H2H |
| Angelique Kerber | 4 | 6 | 10 | Mar 14, 2022 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Madison Keys | 3 | 2 | 5 | Jul 6, 2023 | H2H |
| Iga Swiatek | 1 | 3 | 4 | Aug 6, 2026 | H2H |
| Yulia Putintseva | 3 | 1 | 4 | Oct 31, 2025 | H2H |
| Arantxa Rus | 3 | 1 | 4 | Feb 4, 2025 | H2H |
| Shuai Zhang | 2 | 2 | 4 | Jan 19, 2022 | H2H |