H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:30 UTC
Daria Saville vs Anabel Medina Garrigues H2H: 1-0
Daria Saville holds a 1–0 lead over Anabel Medina Garrigues in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Daria Saville leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Daria Saville won the 2013 Doha second round 4-6 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 32
Right-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 43
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 13, 2013* | Doha | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Daria Saville | 4-6 6-3 6-3 | Anabel Medina Garrigues | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daria Saville | #226 | #20 | 2,135 | 1,836 | 156 | 153 | 50.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Anabel Medina Garrigues | #741 | #16 | 2,505 | 1,852 | 310 | 275 | 53.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 8 | 11 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Daria Saville | Anabel Medina Garrigues | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #539 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #109 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2012 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #226 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 16–20 | 44.4% | #66 | 1,563 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 2013 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #149 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 9–3 | 75.0% | #116 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 2014 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #233 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #71 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2015 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #36 | 1,671 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #39 | 1,716 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 2016 | 25–19 | 56.8% | #25 | 1,810 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #33 | 1,747 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 2017 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #25 | 1,791 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 34–24 | 58.6% | #27 | 1,690 | 0 | 6 |
| 24 | 2018 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #35 | 1,786 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #34 | 1,694 | 0 | 7 |
| 25 | 2019 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #242 | 1,614 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 41–24 | 63.1% | #22 | 1,833 | 0 | 8 |
| 26 | 2020 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #450 | 1,627 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 33–26 | 55.9% | #27 | 1,683 | 0 | 9 |
| 27 | 2021 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #419 | 1,653 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 18–25 | 41.9% | #71 | 1,565 | 0 | 9 |
| 28 | 2022 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #53 | 1,754 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 35–21 | 62.5% | #27 | 1,774 | 0 | 11 |
| 29 | 2023 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #204 | 1,692 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 23–25 | 47.9% | #50 | 1,629 | 0 | 11 |
| 30 | 2024 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #108 | 1,671 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 8–19 | 29.6% | #100 | 1,553 | 0 | 11 |
| 31 | 2025 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #197 | 1,647 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #452 | 1,501 | 0 | 11 |