H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Daria Saville vs Caroline Garcia H2H: 3-1
Daria Saville holds a 3–1 lead over Caroline Garcia in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Daria Saville leads 2–0 on clay, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Caroline Garcia won the 2018 Indian Wells third round 7-5 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 32
Right-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 32
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 12, 2018* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Caroline Garcia | 7-5 6-4 | Daria Saville | Match data |
| May 26, 2017* | Strasbourg | WTA 500 | SF | Clay | Daria Saville | 6-4 6-2 | Caroline Garcia | Match data |
| May 18, 2017* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R32 | Clay | Daria Saville | 7-5 3-6 6-3 | Caroline Garcia | Match data |
| Aug 17, 2016* | Cincinnati | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Daria Saville | 7-5 6-3 | Caroline Garcia | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daria Saville | #226 | #20 | 2,135 | 1,836 | 156 | 153 | 50.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Caroline Garcia | #452 | #4 | 5,170 | 2,008 | 335 | 263 | 56.0% | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 11 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Daria Saville | Caroline Garcia | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #539 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #142 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2012 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #226 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #154 | 1,445 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2013 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #149 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #74 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2014 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #233 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #37 | 1,669 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2015 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #36 | 1,671 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #34 | 1,711 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2016 | 25–19 | 56.8% | #25 | 1,810 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 30–21 | 58.8% | #24 | 1,763 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 2017 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #25 | 1,791 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 48–22 | 68.6% | #8 | 1,969 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 2018 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #35 | 1,786 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 39–21 | 65.0% | #19 | 1,917 | 0 | 6 |
| 25 | 2019 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #242 | 1,614 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 24–25 | 49.0% | #46 | 1,694 | 0 | 7 |
| 26 | 2020 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #450 | 1,627 | 0 | 1 | 2020 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #43 | 1,735 | 0 | 7 |
| 27 | 2021 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #419 | 1,653 | 0 | 1 | 2021 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #74 | 1,700 | 0 | 7 |
| 28 | 2022 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #53 | 1,754 | 0 | 1 | 2022 | 44–20 | 68.8% | #4 | 1,988 | 0 | 11 |
| 29 | 2023 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #204 | 1,692 | 0 | 1 | 2023 | 36–26 | 58.1% | #20 | 1,831 | 0 | 11 |
| 30 | 2024 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #108 | 1,671 | 0 | 1 | 2024 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #48 | 1,797 | 0 | 11 |
| 31 | 2025 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #197 | 1,647 | 0 | 1 | 2025 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #304 | 1,745 | 0 | 11 |