H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Daria Saville vs Lesia Tsurenko H2H: 0-3

Lesia Tsurenko holds a 3–0 lead over Daria Saville in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Lesia Tsurenko leads 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Lesia Tsurenko won the 2018 Acapulco semifinal 6-2 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Daria Saville
Australia Age 32 Right-Handed 166 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0 – 3
3 main-draw meetings
Lesia Tsurenko
Ukraine Age 37 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Lesia Tsurenko #40 6-2 6-4 Daria Saville #26 Match data Mar 2, 2018 SF Acapulco International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Lesia Tsurenko #71 7-6(2) 3-6 6-3 Daria Saville #40 Match data Jul 23, 2015* R32 Istanbul International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Lesia Tsurenko #85 7-5 6-3 Daria Saville #223 Match data Jan 18, 2013* R64 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Daria Saville #226 #20 2,135 1,858 159 156 50.5% 0 0 0 1 0 1
Lesia Tsurenko #386 #23 2,030 1,898 180 202 47.1% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Daria Saville Lesia Tsurenko
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2010 0–1 0.0% #539 1,493 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2012 1–1 50.0% #226 1,508 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2013 2–6 25.0% #149 1,462 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2014 1–1 50.0% #233 1,483 0 0 2009 0–1 0.0% #284 1,483 0 0
21 2015 20–21 48.8% #36 1,675 0 0 2010 1–3 25.0% #155 1,468 0 0
22 2016 27–20 57.4% #25 1,836 0 0 2011 3–7 30.0% #113 1,467 0 0
23 2017 33–22 60.0% #25 1,794 0 1 2012 7–12 36.8% #116 1,484 0 0
24 2018 27–23 54.0% #35 1,781 0 1 2013 11–18 37.9% #68 1,505 0 0
25 2019 6–16 27.3% #242 1,603 0 1 2014 4–8 33.3% #92 1,510 0 0
26 2020 1–1 50.0% #450 1,617 0 1 2015 22–17 56.4% #33 1,720 0 1
27 2021 2–2 50.0% #419 1,645 0 1 2016 19–20 48.7% #57 1,724 0 2
28 2022 19–15 55.9% #53 1,738 0 1 2017 22–24 47.8% #42 1,688 0 3
29 2023 6–8 42.9% #204 1,686 0 1 2018 26–19 57.8% #27 1,808 0 4
30 2024 11–14 44.0% #108 1,667 0 1 2019 14–14 50.0% #73 1,735 0 4
31 2025 3–5 37.5% #197 1,661 0 1 2020 1–3 25.0% #146 1,766 0 4
32 — — — — — — — 2021 6–10 37.5% #118 1,746 0 4
33 — — — — — — — 2022 10–11 47.6% #137 1,765 0 4
34 — — — — — — — 2023 24–15 61.5% #31 1,870 0 4
35 — — — — — — — 2024 10–20 33.3% #115 1,697 0 4

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Daria Saville Lesia Tsurenko
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 2010 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2012 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2013 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2014 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2009 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 2015 13 17 30 43.3% 5 2 7 71.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 2010 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
22 2016 17 13 30 56.7% 7 4 11 63.6% 3 3 6 50.0% 2011 1 3 4 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 2017 21 13 34 61.8% 10 6 16 62.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 2012 4 7 11 36.4% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2018 18 14 32 56.3% 6 6 12 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2013 7 10 17 41.2% 1 5 6 16.7% 3 3 6 50.0%
25 2019 2 8 10 20.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 2014 3 6 9 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
26 2020 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2015 20 12 32 62.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0%
27 2021 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2016 14 11 25 56.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
28 2022 16 10 26 61.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2017 14 15 29 48.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 5 4 9 55.6%
29 2023 3 5 8 37.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2018 20 14 34 58.8% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
30 2024 7 7 14 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 2019 10 6 16 62.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3%
31 2025 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2020 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 5 9 14 35.7% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 2 5 7 28.6% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 13 10 23 56.5% 8 4 12 66.7% 3 1 4 75.0%
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 9 15 24 37.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
Career — 105 101 206 51.0% 39 34 73 53.4% 15 21 36 41.7% — 122 127 249 49.0% 34 48 82 41.5% 24 27 51 47.1%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 287/316 of Daria Saville's and 353/383 of Lesia Tsurenko's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Daria Saville Lesia Tsurenko
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 2010 1/1 5.0 4.0 46.6% 59.3% 38.7% 44.4% 33.3% 48.3% 32.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2012 2/2 4.0 3.0 63.0% 65.8% 46.5% 33.3% 60.0% 58.2% 55.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2013 8/8 2.9 6.5 55.6% 56.5% 36.1% 47.6% 53.1% 47.6% 40.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2014 2/2 2.5 6.0 61.7% 57.5% 39.0% 39.8% 50.0% 50.3% 47.0% 2009 1/1 0.0 0.0 67.3% 54.3% 41.2% 55.6% 16.7% 50.0% 38.6%
21 2015 31/41 2.5 4.6 66.2% 62.3% 49.2% 54.6% 52.2% 57.6% 41.8% 2010 4/4 1.0 3.8 61.0% 59.3% 41.5% 45.5% 53.9% 52.3% 39.6%
22 2016 37/47 1.9 3.9 63.1% 62.0% 47.1% 52.1% 44.7% 56.5% 44.0% 2011 10/10 1.0 4.5 66.1% 57.8% 37.4% 47.0% 48.7% 50.7% 44.4%
23 2017 54/55 2.7 4.8 62.9% 64.0% 45.6% 46.7% 50.8% 57.1% 45.6% 2012 17/19 0.6 6.3 61.4% 56.3% 38.9% 40.3% 55.0% 49.7% 45.7%
24 2018 48/51 1.8 7.7 65.7% 62.8% 37.3% 53.1% 51.4% 54.1% 45.5% 2013 27/29 1.3 5.2 61.6% 59.8% 45.0% 44.2% 53.6% 54.0% 45.8%
25 2019 21/22 1.0 4.2 66.4% 56.8% 43.9% 45.7% 46.5% 52.4% 41.3% 2014 12/12 2.3 5.6 58.7% 59.9% 45.7% 52.5% 41.0% 54.5% 42.5%
26 2020 2/2 0.5 5.0 59.8% 62.1% 52.1% 75.0% 73.2% 58.6% 43.5% 2015 31/39 1.5 4.3 69.1% 63.2% 53.5% 55.0% 49.7% 59.5% 44.8%
27 2021 4/4 2.0 4.0 57.5% 66.2% 46.6% 52.5% 44.5% 57.9% 47.1% 2016 35/39 1.6 5.0 64.8% 60.5% 44.8% 50.5% 53.2% 54.9% 45.5%
28 2022 33/34 2.2 5.0 64.1% 64.5% 44.3% 58.4% 45.6% 57.5% 44.2% 2017 44/46 1.6 4.1 65.6% 61.5% 44.4% 49.1% 52.0% 55.6% 45.4%
29 2023 14/14 1.3 4.8 63.7% 61.1% 38.3% 45.4% 53.3% 53.3% 45.8% 2018 41/45 1.8 4.5 64.4% 61.8% 46.5% 54.0% 47.5% 56.2% 46.0%
30 2024 25/25 2.1 6.2 67.4% 57.8% 41.9% 59.3% 57.6% 52.5% 45.9% 2019 28/28 1.6 3.3 69.7% 59.1% 43.8% 51.0% 54.3% 54.4% 44.8%
31 2025 5/8 1.0 5.0 69.5% 56.9% 39.9% 48.9% 60.2% 51.1% 40.2% 2020 3/4 1.0 4.0 65.0% 53.6% 42.6% 35.2% 43.8% 50.0% 42.8%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 16/16 0.0 3.0 65.8% 55.1% 43.1% 45.6% 55.2% 51.2% 49.3%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 19/21 0.3 3.2 64.4% 53.7% 43.8% 49.8% 49.2% 49.9% 45.1%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2023 37/40 0.1 3.1 66.2% 57.5% 43.0% 47.8% 54.7% 52.7% 50.3%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2024 28/30 0.2 4.9 63.5% 55.1% 40.2% 47.0% 46.8% 49.5% 43.7%
Career — 287/316 2.1 5.3 64.3% 61.8% 43.5% 51.8% 50.3% 55.3% 44.3% — 353/383 1.1 4.3 65.1% 59.1% 44.4% 49.2% 51.1% 53.9% 45.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Daria Saville Lesia Tsurenko
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 2010 1494 101.6 +1.65 -1.80 0.633 40.7% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2012 1508 107.7 +0.29 +3.39 1.317 57.0% — — — 50.0% +1.50 — 0–1 — -0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2013 1462 101.0 -2.47 -1.24 0.771 44.0% +3 — — 26.3% -1.63 2–1 (67%) 0–1 — +1.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2014 1483 109.1 +0.25 +0.24 0.946 48.8% — — — 40.0% -0.40 1–0 0–1 — -0.01 2009 1483 96.1 -0.16 -0.74 0.771 43.4% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.15
21 2015 1675 139.1 +0.59 +1.21 0.985 50.0% -73 -34 -29 50.0% -0.05 8–8 (50%) 10–6 (63%) 106.8 -1.55 2010 1468 101.2 -1.44 -1.76 0.831 46.3% — +62 — 25.0% -1.88 — 1–0 — +0.08
22 2016 1837 143.7 +0.70 +1.71 1.011 50.3% -38 -114 -194 54.4% +0.28 7–5 (58%) 3–2 (60%) 104.2 -1.91 2011 1468 104.4 -3.16 -0.61 0.900 47.5% +23 +64 — 23.5% -1.41 1–0 0–2 — -0.34
23 2017 1795 139.8 +0.45 +2.93 1.061 51.3% +20 -6 -173 57.7% +0.43 14–13 (52%) 7–12 (37%) 96.3 +1.08 2012 1485 109.3 -4.45 +0.03 0.909 47.7% 0 +73 — 40.9% -0.71 4–4 (50%) 3–1 (75%) 102.4 +0.05
24 2018 1781 141.0 -2.19 +2.60 0.991 49.8% +14 0 -108 52.2% -0.08 11–8 (58%) 13–1 (93%) 108.4 -0.58 2013 1505 119.0 -1.69 +1.15 0.995 49.9% +10 -7 +46 40.6% -0.36 4–6 (40%) 1–4 (20%) 97.5 +0.31
25 2019 1604 107.6 -2.88 -1.35 0.868 46.7% +84 +22 +39 27.7% -1.28 4–1 (80%) 1–4 (20%) 99.5 -0.63 2014 1510 105.5 -1.40 -0.49 0.933 48.6% -11 — — 36.7% -0.70 3–3 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 100.7 +0.32
26 2020 1617 108.7 +0.59 +1.52 1.052 51.9% — — — 60.0% +0.40 0–1 — — -0.14 2015 1721 139.7 +1.11 +2.63 1.105 52.2% +8 — -177 59.3% +0.80 5–6 (45%) 6–5 (55%) 102.2 +0.25
27 2021 1646 128.1 +1.67 +2.64 1.117 52.5% +67 — — 50.0% +0.50 — 0–1 — -0.38 2016 1725 125.5 -0.94 +1.32 1.009 50.2% +25 -190 -217 50.6% +0.07 7–3 (70%) 3–6 (33%) 103.6 +1.38
28 2022 1738 136.6 +0.54 +0.98 1.039 50.8% +82 -119 -95 53.7% +0.39 5–4 (56%) 1–5 (17%) 97.2 +0.65 2017 1689 134.1 -0.08 +2.63 1.024 50.6% +20 -134 -107 47.9% -0.10 5–7 (42%) 7–6 (54%) 100.9 -1.57
29 2023 1687 124.8 -0.97 +1.63 0.980 49.5% +59 +5 — 45.2% +0.03 1–2 (33%) 2–3 (40%) 97.6 -0.28 2018 1808 142.9 -0.18 +2.84 1.051 51.2% +2 -219 -158 60.4% +0.77 8–3 (73%) 5–3 (63%) 106.6 +0.69
30 2024 1668 125.0 -3.56 +1.68 0.966 49.2% +38 -36 +6 45.9% -0.21 5–6 (45%) 4–4 (50%) 99.3 -0.44 2019 1736 136.2 -1.34 +1.80 0.981 49.5% +99 -130 -117 46.6% -0.22 3–1 (75%) 1–3 (25%) 100.6 -0.24
31 2025 1662 123.9 -0.99 -0.65 0.821 45.9% +19 — — 35.3% -1.06 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — -0.37 2020 1767 118.5 +0.32 +2.54 0.856 46.8% — — — 42.9% -1.14 0–1 — — -0.91
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1746 128.4 -2.98 +2.74 1.009 50.1% +22 — — 43.8% -0.44 0–4 (0%) 1–1 — -0.04
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1766 127.9 -3.73 +2.57 0.901 47.5% -41 -82 -3 57.5% +0.18 5–3 (63%) 2–2 (50%) 102.9 -1.59
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1870 139.4 -2.54 +6.34 1.063 51.5% -23 -32 -93 62.0% +0.68 7–2 (78%) 3–1 (75%) 107.3 -1.77
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1697 119.9 -5.55 +0.83 0.866 46.6% +16 +33 — 41.4% -0.93 4–4 (50%) 1–0 — +0.10
Career — 1859 140.0 -0.68 +1.60 0.990 49.8% +11 -29 -92 49.6% -0.03 59–51 (54%) 42–41 (51%) 102.9 -1.15 — 1898 136.0 -1.67 +2.21 0.991 49.8% +13 -65 -90 49.5% -0.03 56–47 (54%) 36–36 (50%) 105.0 -0.84

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.