Dayana Yastremska
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jasmine Paolini | 1 | 6 | 7 | May 25, 2026 | H2H |
| Donna Vekic | 2 | 4 | 6 | Jul 7, 2024 | H2H |
| Shuai Zhang | 2 | 3 | 5 | Mar 5, 2026 | H2H |
| Magda Linette | 4 | 1 | 5 | Jun 21, 2025 | H2H |
| Ajla Tomljanovic | 3 | 1 | 4 | Jun 11, 2026 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC
Dayana Yastremska vs Ana Konjuh
Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Dayana Yastremska vs Ana Konjuh.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
0
–
0
0 main-draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dayana Yastremska | 6-1 6-4 | Ana Konjuh | Match data | Apr 12, 2025 | Q1 | Porsche Tennis Grand Prix | WTA 500 | Clay |
1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dayana Yastremska | #113 | #21 | 2,070 | 1,884 | 135 | 150 | 47.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Ana Konjuh | #647 | #20 | 1,830 | 1,786 | 84 | 81 | 50.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Dayana Yastremska | Ana Konjuh | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2016 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #338 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 8–6 | 57.1% | #93 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2017 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #184 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 11–9 | 55.0% | #82 | 1,656 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 2018 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #58 | 1,730 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 19–14 | 57.6% | #47 | 1,683 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 2019 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #22 | 1,822 | 0 | 3 | 2017 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #44 | 1,716 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 2020 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #29 | 1,792 | 0 | 3 | 2018 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #385 | 1,688 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2021 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #99 | 1,692 | 0 | 3 | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1282 | 1,645 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2022 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #101 | 1,614 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2023 | 5–16 | 23.8% | #102 | 1,669 | 0 | 3 | 2021 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #67 | 1,690 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2024 | 16–20 | 44.4% | #33 | 1,648 | 0 | 3 | 2022 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #108 | 1,647 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2025 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #27 | 1,816 | 0 | 3 | 2023 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #407 | 1,587 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2026 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #113 | 1,705 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,464 | 0 | 1 |
Surface Results by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Dayana Yastremska | Ana Konjuh | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | |||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 16 | 2016 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% |
| 17 | 2017 | — | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2015 | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 5 | 1 | 6 | 83.3% |
| 18 | 2018 | 9 | 6 | 15 | 60.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 12 | 7 | 19 | 63.2% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% |
| 19 | 2019 | 23 | 14 | 37 | 62.2% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 2017 | 11 | 10 | 21 | 52.4% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 8 | 4 | 12 | 66.7% |
| 20 | 2020 | 10 | 9 | 19 | 52.6% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 21 | 2021 | 5 | 11 | 16 | 31.3% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2022 | 7 | 10 | 17 | 41.2% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2023 | 4 | 10 | 14 | 28.6% | 1 | 6 | 7 | 14.3% | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 9 | 8 | 17 | 52.9% | 8 | 5 | 13 | 61.5% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 24 | 2024 | 8 | 13 | 21 | 38.1% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 2022 | 6 | 9 | 15 | 40.0% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2025 | 12 | 13 | 25 | 48.0% | 10 | 6 | 16 | 62.5% | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% | 2023 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2026 | 6 | 12 | 18 | 33.3% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 84 | 99 | 183 | 45.9% | 34 | 36 | 70 | 48.6% | 17 | 15 | 32 | 53.1% | — | 49 | 49 | 98 | 50.0% | 19 | 21 | 40 | 47.5% | 16 | 11 | 27 | 59.3% |
Performance Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 265/286 of Dayana Yastremska's and 156/165 of Ana Konjuh's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Dayana Yastremska | Ana Konjuh | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 16 | 2016 | 2/2 | 2.5 | 6.0 | 56.2% | 65.3% | 38.9% | 52.3% | 24.3% | 53.0% | 40.3% | 2014 | 14/14 | 5.4 | 5.8 | 53.2% | 68.0% | 43.3% | 47.2% | 39.0% | 56.7% | 40.4% |
| 17 | 2017 | 4/4 | 1.5 | 3.5 | 66.0% | 50.4% | 54.9% | 55.8% | 51.8% | 52.1% | 49.7% | 2015 | 17/20 | 3.2 | 3.8 | 58.4% | 65.2% | 50.4% | 56.8% | 59.7% | 58.7% | 44.3% |
| 18 | 2018 | 16/16 | 4.1 | 5.7 | 60.7% | 65.8% | 49.1% | 41.8% | 42.8% | 59.2% | 46.9% | 2016 | 28/33 | 3.9 | 5.1 | 53.6% | 70.2% | 45.2% | 57.5% | 47.1% | 58.3% | 43.6% |
| 19 | 2019 | 51/52 | 3.8 | 5.1 | 60.2% | 65.2% | 48.7% | 60.0% | 48.4% | 58.4% | 44.8% | 2017 | 40/40 | 3.6 | 4.7 | 57.7% | 67.7% | 44.6% | 52.8% | 52.3% | 57.9% | 43.3% |
| 20 | 2020 | 26/26 | 4.5 | 5.7 | 58.9% | 67.5% | 46.3% | 45.5% | 47.4% | 58.7% | 42.0% | 2018 | 4/4 | 3.8 | 3.0 | 62.5% | 57.0% | 35.7% | 58.3% | 24.2% | 48.3% | 40.7% |
| 21 | 2021 | 18/19 | 4.1 | 5.6 | 57.9% | 66.1% | 45.9% | 51.1% | 42.2% | 57.7% | 43.3% | 2019 | 1/1 | 3.0 | 8.0 | 42.6% | 76.9% | 42.9% | 25.0% | 0.0% | 57.4% | 27.9% |
| 22 | 2022 | 29/29 | 3.4 | 5.2 | 57.8% | 63.8% | 44.4% | 54.0% | 49.6% | 55.7% | 38.7% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2023 | 21/21 | 2.5 | 5.2 | 57.8% | 59.4% | 42.8% | 40.6% | 53.6% | 52.2% | 41.9% | 2021 | 31/31 | 3.9 | 7.4 | 59.0% | 62.8% | 42.4% | 54.1% | 48.3% | 54.4% | 44.9% |
| 24 | 2024 | 34/36 | 2.9 | 4.3 | 57.8% | 60.9% | 47.1% | 51.9% | 44.5% | 55.0% | 42.0% | 2022 | 18/19 | 4.5 | 5.7 | 57.5% | 64.9% | 39.5% | 51.1% | 36.4% | 53.9% | 39.7% |
| 25 | 2025 | 34/50 | 3.4 | 5.5 | 56.3% | 63.0% | 49.7% | 54.0% | 51.1% | 57.1% | 41.8% | 2023 | 2/2 | 4.0 | 5.5 | 54.5% | 67.3% | 41.9% | 67.7% | 14.3% | 55.7% | 29.4% |
| 26 | 2026 | 30/31 | 2.2 | 5.1 | 61.3% | 59.5% | 46.4% | 48.9% | 46.5% | 54.2% | 41.4% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 1/1 | 0.0 | 8.0 | 42.6% | 60.9% | 48.4% | 42.9% | 33.3% | 53.7% | 36.4% |
| Career | — | 265/286 | 3.4 | 5.2 | 58.9% | 63.2% | 47.0% | 51.5% | 47.6% | 56.4% | 42.6% | — | 156/165 | 3.9 | 5.4 | 56.8% | 66.3% | 43.9% | 53.7% | 46.7% | 56.5% | 42.7% |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Dayana Yastremska | Ana Konjuh | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 16 | 2016 | 1464 | 101.4 | -1.01 | -2.08 | 0.858 | 46.1% | — | — | — | 20.0% | -1.40 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.03 | 2014 | 1611 | 123.8 | +0.22 | -1.66 | 0.933 | 48.3% | -10 | — | +44 | 47.4% | -0.24 | 8–2 (80%) | 1–1 | — | -0.76 |
| 17 | 2017 | 1462 | 104.9 | -0.92 | +0.23 | 1.038 | 50.9% | — | +57 | — | 50.0% | +0.50 | 1–1 | 0–1 | — | +0.10 | 2015 | 1657 | 117.4 | +0.42 | +1.27 | 1.073 | 51.6% | -67 | -102 | +82 | 52.3% | +0.14 | 3–1 (75%) | 1–1 | — | +0.20 |
| 18 | 2018 | 1731 | 136.1 | +1.60 | +2.48 | 1.148 | 52.9% | +20 | — | — | 60.5% | +1.03 | 1–5 (17%) | 2–4 (33%) | 94.2 | -0.03 | 2016 | 1684 | 123.8 | +2.55 | +0.13 | 1.047 | 51.1% | +5 | -132 | -1 | 58.0% | +0.39 | 5–4 (56%) | 3–2 (60%) | 103.1 | +1.16 |
| 19 | 2019 | 1822 | 150.9 | +1.72 | +2.31 | 1.077 | 51.7% | +13 | -207 | -152 | 60.2% | +0.63 | 5–9 (36%) | 6–5 (55%) | 95.7 | -1.96 | 2017 | 1716 | 135.7 | +1.25 | +0.51 | 1.028 | 50.5% | -10 | -157 | +78 | 54.1% | +0.13 | 9–6 (60%) | 8–5 (62%) | 104.6 | -0.34 |
| 20 | 2020 | 1792 | 146.0 | +1.19 | -0.19 | 1.016 | 50.4% | +18 | -118 | — | 52.5% | +0.16 | 5–4 (56%) | 5–5 (50%) | 100.7 | -1.02 | 2018 | 1688 | 106.6 | -1.09 | +0.29 | 0.789 | 44.9% | — | — | — | 33.3% | -1.78 | 0–1 | 1–0 | — | -0.10 |
| 21 | 2021 | 1693 | 125.3 | +1.13 | -0.92 | 1.021 | 50.3% | -17 | -2 | — | 47.7% | 0.00 | 1–7 (13%) | 4–4 (50%) | 91.7 | -0.11 | 2019 | 1646 | 96.7 | -2.44 | -2.78 | 0.654 | 42.6% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.50 | — | — | — | 0.00 |
| 22 | 2022 | 1614 | 122.9 | -0.45 | -2.85 | 0.874 | 47.6% | +13 | +47 | +10 | 43.1% | -0.63 | 5–6 (45%) | 7–4 (64%) | 100.8 | -0.44 | 2020 | 1622 | 97.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2023 | 1669 | 127.5 | -3.00 | -0.65 | 0.875 | 47.1% | +26 | -37 | — | 31.3% | -1.19 | 1–5 (17%) | 2–4 (33%) | 92.8 | +0.36 | 2021 | 1691 | 127.3 | -0.62 | +0.89 | 0.985 | 49.7% | +1 | -22 | — | 52.8% | +0.03 | 6–4 (60%) | 4–4 (50%) | 102.0 | -0.51 |
| 24 | 2024 | 1649 | 136.0 | -0.99 | -0.74 | 0.933 | 48.8% | 0 | +39 | 0 | 45.1% | -0.28 | 9–5 (64%) | 7–5 (58%) | 105.5 | +1.15 | 2022 | 1647 | 126.6 | -1.90 | -1.85 | 0.861 | 46.8% | +43 | -54 | — | 36.4% | -0.91 | 4–4 (50%) | 2–2 (50%) | 99.5 | -1.32 |
| 25 | 2025 | 1816 | 146.4 | +0.46 | -0.46 | 0.975 | 49.9% | -83 | -9 | -41 | 56.5% | +0.37 | 8–9 (47%) | 11–3 (79%) | 106.2 | -1.02 | 2023 | 1587 | 109.7 | -2.35 | -4.08 | 0.664 | 42.9% | — | — | — | 33.3% | -1.67 | 0–1 | 1–0 | — | -0.11 |
| 26 | 2026 | 1706 | 127.7 | -2.66 | -1.59 | 0.905 | 48.1% | -45 | +111 | +58 | 41.3% | -0.73 | 4–9 (31%) | 7–4 (64%) | 97.2 | +0.44 | 2024 | 1554 | 99.4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 1465 | 98.2 | +2.05 | -0.61 | 0.785 | 44.2% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.00 | — | — | — | -0.13 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 1446 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1884 | 142.7 | -0.06 | -0.20 | 0.977 | 49.7% | -8 | -22 | -27 | 49.8% | -0.02 | 40–61 (40%) | 51–39 (57%) | 97.0 | -0.88 | — | 1786 | 128.7 | +0.44 | +0.04 | 0.982 | 49.6% | -3 | -88 | +62 | 50.3% | -0.09 | 35–23 (60%) | 21–15 (58%) | 109.5 | -1.16 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Ana Konjuh
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kristina Mladenovic | 2 | 2 | 4 | Sep 17, 2021 | H2H |
| Elina Svitolina | 1 | 2 | 3 | Jan 3, 2018 | H2H |
| Dominika Cibulkova | 1 | 2 | 3 | Aug 16, 2017 | H2H |
| Kirsten Flipkens | 1 | 2 | 3 | Aug 9, 2017 | H2H |
| Roberta Vinci | 1 | 2 | 3 | Aug 25, 2016 | H2H |