H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Dayana Yastremska vs Christina Mchale H2H: 1-1
Dayana Yastremska and Christina Mchale are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Dayana Yastremska won the 2019 Wuhan third round 6-3 7-6(7).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
UKR
Age 26
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 34
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 25, 2019* | Wuhan | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Dayana Yastremska | 6-3 7-6(7) | Christina Mchale | Match data |
| Sep 13, 2018* | Quebec City | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Christina Mchale | 2-6 6-2 7-6(1) | Dayana Yastremska | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dayana Yastremska | #74 | #21 | 2,070 | 1,884 | 134 | 146 | 47.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Christina Mchale | #319 | #24 | 1,935 | 1,803 | 166 | 207 | 44.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Dayana Yastremska | Christina Mchale | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2016 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #338 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2017 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #184 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #231 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2018 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #58 | 1,730 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #109 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2019 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #22 | 1,821 | 0 | 3 | 2011 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #43 | 1,716 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2020 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #29 | 1,790 | 0 | 3 | 2012 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #33 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2021 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #99 | 1,704 | 0 | 3 | 2013 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #66 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2022 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #101 | 1,600 | 0 | 3 | 2014 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #52 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2023 | 5–16 | 23.8% | #102 | 1,669 | 0 | 3 | 2015 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #63 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2024 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #33 | 1,656 | 0 | 3 | 2016 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #45 | 1,698 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2025 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #27 | 1,816 | 0 | 3 | 2017 | 19–26 | 42.2% | #64 | 1,690 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2026 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #74 | 1,758 | 0 | 3 | 2018 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #151 | 1,568 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #88 | 1,652 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #81 | 1,675 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 2–16 | 11.1% | #159 | 1,524 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #319 | 1,452 | 0 | 1 |