Dayana Yastremska
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jasmine Paolini | 1 | 6 | 7 | May 25, 2026 | H2H |
| Magda Linette | 5 | 1 | 6 | Jun 25, 2025 | H2H |
| Donna Vekic | 2 | 4 | 6 | Jul 7, 2024 | H2H |
| Shuai Zhang | 2 | 3 | 5 | Mar 5, 2026 | H2H |
| Ajla Tomljanovic | 3 | 1 | 4 | Jun 11, 2026 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-10-29 00:00 UTC
Dayana Yastremska vs Cristina Bucsa H2H: 3-0
Dayana Yastremska holds a 3–0 lead over Cristina Bucsa in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Dayana Yastremska leads 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Dayana Yastremska won the 2026 Wuhan Open first round 6-4 5-7 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
3
–
0
3 main-draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dayana Yastremska | 6-4 5-7 6-3 | Cristina Bucsa | Match data | Oct 13, 2026 | R64 | Wuhan Open | WTA 1000 | Hard |
| Dayana Yastremska | 6-4 4-6 7-6(5) | Cristina Bucsa | Match data | Feb 9, 2026 | R64 | Qatar Open | WTA 1000 | Hard |
| Dayana Yastremska | 6-2 6-3 | Cristina Bucsa | Match data | Mar 4, 2022* | R16 | Lyon | WTA 250 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dayana Yastremska | #97 | #21 | 2,070 | 1,885 | 141 | 154 | 47.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Cristina Bucsa | #42 | #30 | 1,446 | 1,817 | 60 | 96 | 38.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Dayana Yastremska | Cristina Bucsa | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2016 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #338 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2017 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #184 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2018 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #58 | 1,730 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2019 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #22 | 1,822 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2020 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #29 | 1,792 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2021 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #99 | 1,692 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2022 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #101 | 1,614 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2023 | 5–16 | 23.8% | #102 | 1,669 | 0 | 3 | 2021 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #161 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2024 | 16–20 | 44.4% | #33 | 1,648 | 0 | 3 | 2022 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #105 | 1,686 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2025 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #27 | 1,816 | 0 | 3 | 2023 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #61 | 1,712 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2026 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #97 | 1,739 | 0 | 3 | 2024 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #103 | 1,678 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #51 | 1,761 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 15–21 | 41.7% | #42 | 1,713 | 0 | 1 |
Surface Results by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Dayana Yastremska | Cristina Bucsa | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | |||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 16 | 2016 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2017 | — | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2018 | 9 | 6 | 15 | 60.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2019 | 23 | 14 | 37 | 62.2% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2020 | 10 | 9 | 19 | 52.6% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2021 | 5 | 11 | 16 | 31.3% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2022 | 7 | 10 | 17 | 41.2% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2023 | 4 | 10 | 14 | 28.6% | 1 | 6 | 7 | 14.3% | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2024 | 8 | 13 | 21 | 38.1% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 2022 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 25 | 2025 | 12 | 13 | 25 | 48.0% | 10 | 6 | 16 | 62.5% | 8 | 3 | 11 | 72.7% | 2023 | 6 | 9 | 15 | 40.0% | 3 | 7 | 10 | 30.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% |
| 26 | 2026 | 10 | 15 | 25 | 40.0% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 2024 | 9 | 14 | 23 | 39.1% | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 11 | 13 | 24 | 45.8% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 15 | 17 | 32 | 46.9% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 88 | 102 | 190 | 46.3% | 34 | 36 | 70 | 48.6% | 19 | 16 | 35 | 54.3% | — | 44 | 61 | 105 | 41.9% | 11 | 26 | 37 | 29.7% | 5 | 9 | 14 | 35.7% |
Performance Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 272/296 of Dayana Yastremska's and 136/157 of Cristina Bucsa's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Dayana Yastremska | Cristina Bucsa | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 16 | 2016 | 2/2 | 2.5 | 6.0 | 56.2% | 65.3% | 38.9% | 52.3% | 24.3% | 53.0% | 40.3% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2017 | 4/4 | 1.5 | 3.5 | 66.0% | 50.4% | 54.9% | 55.8% | 51.8% | 52.1% | 49.7% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2018 | 16/16 | 4.1 | 5.7 | 60.7% | 65.8% | 49.1% | 41.8% | 42.8% | 59.2% | 46.9% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2019 | 51/52 | 3.8 | 5.1 | 60.2% | 65.2% | 48.7% | 60.0% | 48.4% | 58.4% | 44.8% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2020 | 26/26 | 4.5 | 5.7 | 58.9% | 67.5% | 46.3% | 45.5% | 47.4% | 58.7% | 42.0% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2021 | 18/19 | 4.1 | 5.6 | 57.9% | 66.1% | 45.9% | 51.1% | 42.2% | 57.7% | 43.3% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2022 | 29/29 | 3.4 | 5.2 | 57.8% | 63.8% | 44.4% | 54.0% | 49.6% | 55.7% | 38.7% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2023 | 21/21 | 2.5 | 5.2 | 57.8% | 59.4% | 42.8% | 40.6% | 53.6% | 52.2% | 41.9% | 2021 | 7/7 | 0.4 | 3.9 | 73.1% | 50.9% | 35.2% | 46.8% | 44.5% | 46.9% | 43.6% |
| 24 | 2024 | 34/36 | 2.9 | 4.3 | 57.8% | 60.9% | 47.1% | 51.9% | 44.5% | 55.0% | 42.0% | 2022 | 13/13 | 0.5 | 3.4 | 68.7% | 56.2% | 41.6% | 57.8% | 45.5% | 51.5% | 41.7% |
| 25 | 2025 | 34/53 | 3.4 | 5.5 | 56.3% | 63.0% | 49.7% | 54.0% | 51.1% | 57.1% | 41.8% | 2023 | 29/29 | 1.1 | 3.5 | 63.8% | 55.8% | 40.3% | 45.3% | 44.7% | 50.2% | 41.7% |
| 26 | 2026 | 37/38 | 2.3 | 4.9 | 62.4% | 60.1% | 47.0% | 49.2% | 45.1% | 54.9% | 41.5% | 2024 | 34/37 | 1.1 | 3.3 | 66.1% | 59.9% | 44.3% | 52.5% | 48.5% | 54.6% | 43.4% |
| 27 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 20/35 | 1.4 | 2.8 | 64.3% | 68.2% | 44.2% | 68.7% | 36.7% | 59.7% | 43.9% |
| 28 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 33/36 | 1.1 | 3.4 | 64.3% | 61.1% | 43.6% | 47.2% | 44.4% | 54.6% | 42.1% |
| Career | — | 272/296 | 3.3 | 5.2 | 59.1% | 63.2% | 47.1% | 51.5% | 47.4% | 56.5% | 42.5% | — | 136/157 | 1.0 | 3.3 | 65.5% | 59.7% | 42.6% | 52.1% | 44.6% | 53.7% | 42.6% |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Dayana Yastremska | Cristina Bucsa | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 16 | 2016 | 1464 | 101.4 | -1.01 | -2.08 | 0.858 | 46.1% | — | — | — | 20.0% | -1.40 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.03 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2017 | 1462 | 104.9 | -0.92 | +0.23 | 1.038 | 50.9% | — | +57 | — | 50.0% | +0.50 | 1–1 | 0–1 | — | +0.10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2018 | 1731 | 136.2 | +1.60 | +2.48 | 1.148 | 52.9% | +20 | — | — | 60.5% | +1.03 | 1–5 (17%) | 2–4 (33%) | 94.2 | -0.03 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2019 | 1822 | 151.0 | +1.72 | +2.31 | 1.077 | 51.7% | +13 | -207 | -152 | 60.2% | +0.63 | 5–9 (36%) | 6–5 (55%) | 95.7 | -1.96 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2020 | 1792 | 146.0 | +1.19 | -0.19 | 1.016 | 50.4% | +18 | -118 | — | 52.5% | +0.16 | 5–4 (56%) | 5–5 (50%) | 100.7 | -1.02 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2021 | 1693 | 125.3 | +1.13 | -0.92 | 1.021 | 50.3% | -17 | -2 | — | 47.7% | 0.00 | 1–7 (13%) | 4–4 (50%) | 91.7 | -0.11 | 2019 | 1487 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2022 | 1614 | 122.9 | -0.45 | -2.85 | 0.874 | 47.6% | +13 | +47 | +11 | 43.1% | -0.63 | 5–6 (45%) | 7–4 (64%) | 100.8 | -0.44 | 2020 | 1499 | 105.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2023 | 1669 | 127.5 | -3.00 | -0.65 | 0.875 | 47.1% | +26 | -37 | — | 31.3% | -1.19 | 1–5 (17%) | 2–4 (33%) | 92.8 | +0.36 | 2021 | 1547 | 120.8 | -3.76 | -1.11 | 0.820 | 45.3% | — | +21 | — | 26.7% | -1.33 | 1–2 (33%) | 0–1 | — | -0.27 |
| 24 | 2024 | 1649 | 136.0 | -0.99 | -0.74 | 0.933 | 48.8% | 0 | +39 | 0 | 45.1% | -0.28 | 9–5 (64%) | 7–5 (58%) | 105.5 | +1.15 | 2022 | 1686 | 118.4 | -2.96 | +0.15 | 0.858 | 46.9% | -9 | -59 | — | 33.3% | -1.23 | 2–2 (50%) | 1–1 | — | -0.37 |
| 25 | 2025 | 1817 | 145.4 | +0.41 | -0.56 | 0.975 | 49.9% | -84 | -10 | -16 | 56.3% | +0.35 | 8–9 (47%) | 11–3 (79%) | 106.1 | -0.93 | 2023 | 1712 | 126.2 | -3.79 | -0.06 | 0.837 | 46.0% | +17 | -88 | -66 | 34.8% | -1.20 | 7–4 (64%) | 4–2 (67%) | 105.8 | -1.29 |
| 26 | 2026 | 1739 | 130.8 | -1.85 | -1.59 | 0.919 | 48.3% | -32 | +75 | +35 | 42.9% | -0.65 | 6–9 (40%) | 8–4 (67%) | 99.9 | +0.24 | 2024 | 1679 | 130.3 | -1.56 | +0.24 | 0.955 | 49.0% | -2 | -29 | -36 | 42.4% | -0.46 | 5–6 (45%) | 3–3 (50%) | 98.8 | +0.76 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 1762 | 134.5 | +2.00 | +1.14 | 1.090 | 51.5% | +11 | -206 | -61 | 46.8% | -0.05 | 4–7 (36%) | 1–6 (14%) | 94.9 | -0.30 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 1714 | 137.7 | -2.06 | -0.73 | 0.928 | 48.2% | +12 | -223 | — | 44.0% | -0.39 | 5–7 (42%) | 5–7 (42%) | 95.5 | +1.49 |
| Career | — | 1885 | 142.5 | -0.02 | -0.24 | 0.977 | 49.7% | -8 | -26 | -24 | 49.8% | -0.03 | 42–61 (41%) | 52–39 (57%) | 97.9 | -0.88 | — | 1818 | 133.3 | -1.88 | -0.01 | 0.921 | 48.1% | +8 | -81 | -57 | 40.9% | -0.60 | 24–28 (46%) | 14–20 (41%) | 95.7 | +0.01 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Cristina Bucsa
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elise Mertens | 2 | 3 | 5 | Mar 8, 2026 | H2H |
| Shuai Zhang | 0 | 4 | 4 | May 19, 2026 | H2H |
| Donna Vekic | 3 | 1 | 4 | Feb 24, 2026 | H2H |
| Dayana Yastremska | 0 | 3 | 3 | Oct 13, 2026 | H2H |
| Yuliia Starodubtseva | 2 | 1 | 3 | Mar 20, 2026 | H2H |