H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 10:32 UTC
Dayana Yastremska vs Julia Goerges H2H: 0-2
Julia Goerges holds a 2–0 lead over Dayana Yastremska in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Julia Goerges leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Julia Goerges won the 2019 Birmingham third round 3-6 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
UKR
Age 26
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
GER
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 20, 2019* | Birmingham | WTA 250 | R32 | Grass | Julia Goerges | 3-6 6-4 6-3 | Dayana Yastremska | Match data |
| Aug 23, 2018* | New Haven | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Julia Goerges | 6-4 3-6 6-4 | Dayana Yastremska | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dayana Yastremska | #74 | #21 | 2,070 | 1,884 | 134 | 146 | 47.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Julia Goerges | #45 | #9 | 3,980 | 1,940 | 304 | 249 | 55.0% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Dayana Yastremska | Julia Goerges | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2016 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #338 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #126 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #184 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #108 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #58 | 1,730 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #77 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #22 | 1,821 | 0 | 3 | 2010 | 29–22 | 56.9% | #40 | 1,760 | 0 | 1 |
| 2020 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #29 | 1,790 | 0 | 3 | 2011 | 36–24 | 60.0% | #21 | 1,772 | 0 | 2 |
| 2021 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #99 | 1,704 | 0 | 3 | 2012 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #18 | 1,751 | 0 | 2 |
| 2022 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #101 | 1,600 | 0 | 3 | 2013 | 14–27 | 34.1% | #72 | 1,535 | 0 | 2 |
| 2023 | 5–16 | 23.8% | #102 | 1,669 | 0 | 3 | 2014 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #74 | 1,596 | 0 | 2 |
| 2024 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #33 | 1,656 | 0 | 3 | 2015 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #50 | 1,612 | 0 | 2 |
| 2025 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #27 | 1,816 | 0 | 3 | 2016 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #53 | 1,671 | 0 | 2 |
| 2026 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #74 | 1,758 | 0 | 3 | 2017 | 42–22 | 65.6% | #14 | 1,880 | 0 | 4 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #14 | 1,861 | 0 | 6 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #28 | 1,799 | 0 | 7 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #45 | 1,761 | 0 | 7 |