H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Dayana Yastremska vs Julia Goerges H2H: 0-2

Julia Goerges holds a 2–0 lead over Dayana Yastremska in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Julia Goerges leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Julia Goerges won the 2019 Birmingham first round 3-6 6-4 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Dayana Yastremska
Ukraine Age 26 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main-draw meetings
Julia Goerges
GER Age 37 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Julia Goerges #19 3-6 6-4 6-3 Dayana Yastremska #35 Match data Jun 20, 2019* R32 Birmingham Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 Grass
Julia Goerges #9 6-4 3-6 6-4 Dayana Yastremska #104 Match data Aug 23, 2018* R16 New Haven Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Dayana Yastremska #113 #21 2,070 1,884 135 150 47.4% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Julia Goerges #45 #9 3,980 1,945 311 251 55.3% 0 0 1 2 4 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Dayana Yastremska Julia Goerges
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2016 0–2 0.0% #338 1,463 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2017 2–2 50.0% #184 1,461 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2018 9–7 56.2% #58 1,730 0 1 2007 4–5 44.4% #126 1,543 0 0
19 2019 31–21 59.6% #22 1,822 0 3 2008 6–7 46.2% #108 1,557 0 0
20 2020 14–12 53.8% #29 1,792 0 3 2009 9–11 45.0% #77 1,589 0 0
21 2021 7–12 36.8% #99 1,692 0 3 2010 29–22 56.9% #40 1,760 0 1
22 2022 12–17 41.4% #101 1,614 0 3 2011 36–24 60.0% #21 1,773 0 2
23 2023 5–16 23.8% #102 1,669 0 3 2012 36–26 58.1% #18 1,761 0 2
24 2024 16–20 44.4% #33 1,648 0 3 2013 14–27 34.1% #72 1,543 0 2
25 2025 28–21 57.1% #27 1,816 0 3 2014 15–18 45.5% #74 1,587 0 2
26 2026 11–20 35.5% #113 1,705 0 3 2015 17–20 45.9% #50 1,609 0 2
27 — — — — — — — 2016 22–20 52.4% #53 1,668 0 2
28 — — — — — — — 2017 46–22 67.6% #14 1,892 0 4
29 — — — — — — — 2018 45–23 66.2% #14 1,871 0 6
30 — — — — — — — 2019 26–20 56.5% #28 1,802 0 7
31 — — — — — — — 2020 6–6 50.0% #45 1,763 0 7

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Dayana Yastremska Julia Goerges
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 2016 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2017 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2018 9 6 15 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2007 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2019 23 14 37 62.2% 5 4 9 55.6% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2008 5 5 10 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
20 2020 10 9 19 52.6% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — 2009 6 7 13 46.2% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
21 2021 5 11 16 31.3% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — 2010 16 14 30 53.3% 13 7 20 65.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
22 2022 7 10 17 41.2% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 2011 18 16 34 52.9% 16 6 22 72.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
23 2023 4 10 14 28.6% 1 6 7 14.3% — — — — — — — — 2012 20 15 35 57.1% 10 8 18 55.6% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7%
24 2024 8 13 21 38.1% 5 5 10 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2013 7 16 23 30.4% 7 9 16 43.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2025 12 13 25 48.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — 2014 10 10 20 50.0% 5 7 12 41.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
26 2026 6 12 18 33.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2015 11 13 24 45.8% 6 6 12 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 13 12 25 52.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 35 13 48 72.9% 7 7 14 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 28 14 42 66.7% 10 6 16 62.5% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 19 12 31 61.3% 1 6 7 14.3% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 5 4 9 55.6% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
Career — 84 99 183 45.9% 34 36 70 48.6% 17 15 32 53.1% — — — — — 197 156 353 55.8% 86 73 159 54.1% 26 20 46 56.5% 2 2 4 50.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 265/286 of Dayana Yastremska's and 524/562 of Julia Goerges's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Dayana Yastremska Julia Goerges
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 2016 2/2 2.5 6.0 56.2% 65.3% 38.9% 52.3% 24.3% 53.0% 40.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
17 2017 4/4 1.5 3.5 66.0% 50.4% 54.9% 55.8% 51.8% 52.1% 49.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2018 16/16 4.1 5.7 60.7% 65.8% 49.1% 41.8% 42.8% 59.2% 46.9% 2007 6/9 2.7 3.3 54.7% 64.8% 42.0% 59.6% 55.1% 54.0% 40.7%
19 2019 51/52 3.8 5.1 60.2% 65.2% 48.7% 60.0% 48.4% 58.4% 44.8% 2008 11/13 5.1 5.3 59.1% 67.7% 46.8% 52.0% 47.2% 59.3% 39.2%
20 2020 26/26 4.5 5.7 58.9% 67.5% 46.3% 45.5% 47.4% 58.7% 42.0% 2009 19/20 5.2 2.4 60.4% 68.6% 50.1% 58.4% 43.6% 61.4% 40.4%
21 2021 18/19 4.1 5.6 57.9% 66.1% 45.9% 51.1% 42.2% 57.7% 43.3% 2010 49/51 4.2 3.5 61.2% 66.7% 45.8% 58.1% 48.1% 58.5% 43.3%
22 2022 29/29 3.4 5.2 57.8% 63.8% 44.4% 54.0% 49.6% 55.7% 38.7% 2011 59/60 4.1 2.7 58.4% 70.4% 49.1% 52.6% 48.8% 61.3% 43.2%
23 2023 21/21 2.5 5.2 57.8% 59.4% 42.8% 40.6% 53.6% 52.2% 41.9% 2012 56/62 3.9 2.9 57.7% 67.0% 48.1% 54.3% 47.8% 59.1% 43.6%
24 2024 34/36 2.9 4.3 57.8% 60.9% 47.1% 51.9% 44.5% 55.0% 42.0% 2013 40/41 4.5 4.0 55.6% 66.4% 44.5% 53.8% 46.9% 56.5% 40.0%
25 2025 34/50 3.4 5.5 56.3% 63.0% 49.7% 54.0% 51.1% 57.1% 41.8% 2014 31/33 6.1 4.1 59.2% 68.5% 48.8% 54.2% 44.2% 60.3% 42.5%
26 2026 30/31 2.2 5.1 61.3% 59.5% 46.4% 48.9% 46.5% 54.2% 41.4% 2015 30/37 4.7 2.5 60.0% 67.8% 47.7% 49.3% 50.2% 59.9% 40.7%
27 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 36/42 5.0 3.4 56.9% 71.9% 49.2% 58.3% 41.9% 61.9% 40.6%
28 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 64/68 5.8 3.4 57.0% 72.1% 49.1% 56.1% 50.6% 62.3% 42.7%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 65/68 7.4 3.7 57.7% 74.7% 49.3% 59.1% 42.7% 63.9% 39.5%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 46/46 6.7 4.1 55.4% 73.0% 48.9% 58.3% 42.8% 62.1% 40.8%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 12/12 6.6 3.5 56.8% 70.9% 47.8% 60.1% 48.8% 61.0% 40.5%
Career — 265/286 3.4 5.2 58.9% 63.2% 47.0% 51.5% 47.6% 56.4% 42.6% — 524/562 5.3 3.4 57.9% 70.0% 48.1% 55.9% 46.6% 60.7% 41.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Dayana Yastremska Julia Goerges
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 2016 1464 101.4 -1.01 -2.08 0.858 46.1% — — — 20.0% -1.40 0–1 — — +0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2017 1462 104.9 -0.92 +0.23 1.038 50.9% — +57 — 50.0% +0.50 1–1 0–1 — +0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2018 1731 136.1 +1.60 +2.48 1.148 52.9% +20 — — 60.5% +1.03 1–5 (17%) 2–4 (33%) 94.2 -0.03 2007 1544 122.1 +0.76 +0.36 0.884 47.2% +9 — — 40.0% -0.95 2–2 (50%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.18
19 2019 1822 150.9 +1.72 +2.31 1.077 51.7% +13 -207 -152 60.2% +0.63 5–9 (36%) 6–5 (55%) 95.7 -1.96 2008 1558 111.9 +1.60 -1.77 0.961 49.2% +4 — — 46.7% -0.13 2–2 (50%) 3–4 (43%) 98.9 +0.66
20 2020 1792 146.0 +1.19 -0.19 1.016 50.4% +18 -118 — 52.5% +0.16 5–4 (56%) 5–5 (50%) 100.7 -1.02 2009 1590 119.7 +2.92 -2.21 1.046 50.8% -1 -63 +41 50.0% +0.09 2–4 (33%) 2–3 (40%) 96.5 -0.08
21 2021 1693 125.3 +1.13 -0.92 1.021 50.3% -17 -2 — 47.7% 0.00 1–7 (13%) 4–4 (50%) 91.7 -0.11 2010 1761 134.3 +2.06 +0.13 1.043 51.0% -59 -53 — 54.7% +0.42 9–6 (60%) 3–6 (33%) 104.4 -1.65
22 2022 1614 122.9 -0.45 -2.85 0.874 47.6% +13 +47 +10 43.1% -0.63 5–6 (45%) 7–4 (64%) 100.8 -0.44 2011 1774 141.6 +5.63 -0.14 1.115 52.1% -57 +89 -162 55.6% +0.56 11–8 (58%) 4–11 (27%) 98.6 -1.13
23 2023 1669 127.5 -3.00 -0.65 0.875 47.1% +26 -37 — 31.3% -1.19 1–5 (17%) 2–4 (33%) 92.8 +0.36 2012 1761 139.8 +2.73 +0.03 1.067 51.4% +21 +17 -68 55.1% +0.34 11–7 (61%) 9–12 (43%) 100.1 -0.26
24 2024 1649 136.0 -0.99 -0.74 0.933 48.8% 0 +39 0 45.1% -0.28 9–5 (64%) 7–5 (58%) 105.5 +1.15 2013 1544 119.3 +0.51 -3.35 0.920 48.5% +41 +130 — 40.4% -0.70 5–10 (33%) 2–7 (22%) 89.5 +1.42
25 2025 1816 146.4 +0.46 -0.46 0.975 49.9% -83 -9 -41 56.5% +0.37 8–9 (47%) 11–3 (79%) 106.2 -1.02 2014 1588 128.4 +3.16 -0.41 1.070 51.1% +14 +50 — 51.2% +0.09 4–14 (22%) 3–5 (38%) 89.3 -1.01
26 2026 1706 127.7 -2.66 -1.59 0.905 48.1% -45 +111 +58 41.3% -0.73 4–9 (31%) 7–4 (64%) 97.2 +0.44 2015 1610 130.1 +1.79 -0.65 1.013 50.5% -4 +23 — 47.6% +0.12 4–6 (40%) 6–4 (60%) 98.9 -0.01
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1668 133.2 +4.47 -2.01 1.064 51.3% 0 +4 — 52.2% +0.42 5–5 (50%) 4–6 (40%) 99.7 -0.80
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1893 143.8 +5.08 -0.79 1.134 52.4% +26 -228 -276 66.4% +0.92 12–7 (63%) 8–5 (62%) 105.4 -0.01
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1872 146.7 +6.30 -1.90 1.092 51.6% +1 -125 -90 62.3% +0.73 16–8 (67%) 14–7 (67%) 107.5 -0.46
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1802 139.1 +4.10 -1.39 1.079 51.4% +14 -176 +70 56.9% +0.57 10–6 (63%) 6–8 (43%) 95.7 +0.72
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1764 128.3 +1.47 -1.09 1.038 50.8% +27 -153 — 50.0% +0.29 2–2 (50%) 2–4 (33%) 97.9 -0.07
Career — 1884 142.7 -0.06 -0.20 0.977 49.7% -8 -22 -27 49.8% -0.02 40–61 (40%) 51–39 (57%) 97.0 -0.88 — 1945 141.6 +3.70 -1.05 1.060 51.2% +1 -18 -76 54.8% +0.37 95–87 (52%) 68–83 (45%) 95.2 -0.51

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.