H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 19:17 UTC
Dayana Yastremska vs Laura Siegemund H2H: 2-1
Dayana Yastremska holds a 2–1 lead over Laura Siegemund in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Dayana Yastremska leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Laura Siegemund won the 2025 Wuhan second round 7-5 4-6 4-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
UKR
Age 26
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
GER
Age 38
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 6, 2025 | Wuhan | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Laura Siegemund | 7-5 4-6 4-1 | Dayana Yastremska | Match data |
| May 10, 2024* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Dayana Yastremska | 4-6 7-5 6-2 | Laura Siegemund | Match data |
| Feb 5, 2023 | Abu Dhabi | WTA 500 | Q1 | Hard | Dayana Yastremska | 6-3 6-1 | Laura Siegemund | Match data |
| Jan 10, 2019* | Hobart | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Dayana Yastremska | 6-3 6-1 | Laura Siegemund | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dayana Yastremska | #74 | #21 | 2,070 | 1,884 | 134 | 146 | 47.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Laura Siegemund | #87 | #27 | 1,630 | 1,828 | 143 | 152 | 48.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Dayana Yastremska | Laura Siegemund | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2016 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #338 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2017 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #184 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2018 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #58 | 1,730 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2019 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #22 | 1,821 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2020 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #29 | 1,790 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2021 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #99 | 1,704 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2022 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #101 | 1,600 | 0 | 3 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #220 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2023 | 5–16 | 23.8% | #102 | 1,669 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2024 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #33 | 1,656 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2025 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #27 | 1,816 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2026 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #74 | 1,758 | 0 | 3 | 2014 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #136 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #98 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 27–17 | 61.4% | #31 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #69 | 1,792 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #113 | 1,691 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #75 | 1,666 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 11–9 | 55.0% | #51 | 1,762 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #125 | 1,727 | 0 | 2 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #177 | 1,652 | 0 | 2 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 13–11 | 54.2% | #86 | 1,784 | 0 | 2 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #80 | 1,738 | 0 | 2 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #46 | 1,803 | 0 | 2 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #87 | 1,748 | 0 | 2 |