H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Dayana Yastremska vs Laura Siegemund H2H: 2-1

Dayana Yastremska holds a 2–1 lead over Laura Siegemund in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Dayana Yastremska leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Laura Siegemund won the 2025 Wuhan Open first round 7-5 4-6 4-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Dayana Yastremska
Ukraine Age 26 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main-draw meetings
Laura Siegemund
Germany Age 38 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Laura Siegemund #57 7-5 4-6 4-1 (ret.) Dayana Yastremska #31 Match data Oct 6, 2025 R64 Wuhan Open WTA 1000 Hard
Dayana Yastremska #33 4-6 7-5 6-2 Laura Siegemund #86 Match data May 10, 2024* R64 Italian Open WTA 1000 Clay
Dayana Yastremska #103 6-3 6-1 Laura Siegemund #125 Match data Feb 5, 2023 Q1 Q Abu Dhabi Open WTA 500 Hard
Dayana Yastremska #59 6-3 6-1 Laura Siegemund #110 Match data Jan 9, 2019* R32 Hobart International International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Dayana Yastremska #113 #21 2,070 1,884 135 150 47.4% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Laura Siegemund #102 #27 1,630 1,852 145 154 48.5% 0 0 0 1 1 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Dayana Yastremska Laura Siegemund
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2016 0–2 0.0% #338 1,463 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2017 2–2 50.0% #184 1,461 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2018 9–7 56.2% #58 1,730 0 1 — — — — — — —
19 2019 31–21 59.6% #22 1,822 0 3 — — — — — — —
20 2020 14–12 53.8% #29 1,792 0 3 — — — — — — —
21 2021 7–12 36.8% #99 1,692 0 3 — — — — — — —
22 2022 12–17 41.4% #101 1,614 0 3 2010 0–1 0.0% #220 1,483 0 0
23 2023 5–16 23.8% #102 1,669 0 3 — — — — — — —
24 2024 16–20 44.4% #33 1,648 0 3 — — — — — — —
25 2025 28–21 57.1% #27 1,816 0 3 — — — — — — —
26 2026 11–20 35.5% #113 1,705 0 3 2014 1–2 33.3% #136 1,495 0 0
27 — — — — — — — 2015 5–7 41.7% #98 1,529 0 0
28 — — — — — — — 2016 30–18 62.5% #31 1,747 0 1
29 — — — — — — — 2017 13–12 52.0% #69 1,796 0 2
30 — — — — — — — 2018 8–11 42.1% #113 1,693 0 2
31 — — — — — — — 2019 15–20 42.9% #75 1,667 0 2
32 — — — — — — — 2020 11–8 57.9% #51 1,789 0 2
33 — — — — — — — 2021 8–14 36.4% #125 1,731 0 2
34 — — — — — — — 2022 3–7 30.0% #177 1,655 0 2
35 — — — — — — — 2023 13–11 54.2% #86 1,801 0 2
36 — — — — — — — 2024 17–17 50.0% #80 1,739 0 2
37 — — — — — — — 2025 13–14 48.1% #46 1,803 0 2
38 — — — — — — — 2026 8–12 40.0% #102 1,748 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Dayana Yastremska Laura Siegemund
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 2016 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2017 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2018 9 6 15 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2019 23 14 37 62.2% 5 4 9 55.6% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2020 10 9 19 52.6% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2021 5 11 16 31.3% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2022 7 10 17 41.2% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 2010 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
23 2023 4 10 14 28.6% 1 6 7 14.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2024 8 13 21 38.1% 5 5 10 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2025 12 13 25 48.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2026 6 12 18 33.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 3 3 6 50.0% 2014 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 2 2 4 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 11 9 20 55.0% 18 6 24 75.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1 8 9 11.1% 12 4 16 75.0% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1 3 4 25.0% 7 8 15 46.7% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 7 12 19 36.8% 7 7 14 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 5 5 10 50.0% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 4 8 12 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0%
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1 5 6 16.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 12 9 21 57.1% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 11 9 20 55.0% 5 7 12 41.7% 1 1 2 50.0%
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 8 8 16 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2026 3 5 8 37.5% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
Career — 84 99 183 45.9% 34 36 70 48.6% 17 15 32 53.1% — 66 83 149 44.3% 69 56 125 55.2% 10 15 25 40.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 265/286 of Dayana Yastremska's and 277/301 of Laura Siegemund's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Dayana Yastremska Laura Siegemund
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 2016 2/2 2.5 6.0 56.2% 65.3% 38.9% 52.3% 24.3% 53.0% 40.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
17 2017 4/4 1.5 3.5 66.0% 50.4% 54.9% 55.8% 51.8% 52.1% 49.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2018 16/16 4.1 5.7 60.7% 65.8% 49.1% 41.8% 42.8% 59.2% 46.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2019 51/52 3.8 5.1 60.2% 65.2% 48.7% 60.0% 48.4% 58.4% 44.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2020 26/26 4.5 5.7 58.9% 67.5% 46.3% 45.5% 47.4% 58.7% 42.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2021 18/19 4.1 5.6 57.9% 66.1% 45.9% 51.1% 42.2% 57.7% 43.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2022 29/29 3.4 5.2 57.8% 63.8% 44.4% 54.0% 49.6% 55.7% 38.7% 2010 1/1 0.0 3.0 73.3% 33.3% 33.3% 12.5% 50.0% 33.3% 47.5%
23 2023 21/21 2.5 5.2 57.8% 59.4% 42.8% 40.6% 53.6% 52.2% 41.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2024 34/36 2.9 4.3 57.8% 60.9% 47.1% 51.9% 44.5% 55.0% 42.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 2025 34/50 3.4 5.5 56.3% 63.0% 49.7% 54.0% 51.1% 57.1% 41.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 2026 30/31 2.2 5.1 61.3% 59.5% 46.4% 48.9% 46.5% 54.2% 41.4% 2014 3/3 3.3 8.0 63.6% 61.4% 44.0% 61.0% 54.8% 55.3% 49.0%
27 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 8/12 0.8 2.6 70.8% 58.6% 50.3% 47.6% 51.3% 55.8% 47.8%
28 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 43/48 1.0 2.7 71.0% 59.9% 46.9% 51.7% 50.6% 56.1% 46.0%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 24/25 1.1 4.5 69.0% 58.7% 42.8% 57.5% 45.1% 53.7% 46.8%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 19/20 1.1 3.9 66.0% 59.6% 47.9% 49.6% 54.3% 55.6% 45.3%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 35/35 1.1 3.7 68.9% 59.9% 48.7% 53.5% 42.0% 56.5% 41.2%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 19/19 0.9 3.6 68.5% 61.3% 46.8% 52.7% 43.6% 56.7% 43.5%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 20/22 0.6 3.2 70.1% 56.1% 49.0% 51.7% 47.4% 53.9% 40.6%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 10/10 0.4 3.9 70.1% 58.4% 45.6% 50.7% 39.2% 54.8% 37.6%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2023 23/24 0.6 3.0 75.3% 62.5% 44.7% 59.6% 49.4% 58.0% 42.5%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2024 32/34 0.7 3.4 73.1% 56.6% 44.4% 51.6% 50.4% 53.3% 47.1%
37 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2025 21/28 1.0 3.4 74.1% 60.5% 42.3% 54.9% 43.0% 55.6% 44.3%
38 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2026 19/20 1.4 2.8 75.0% 59.2% 46.8% 52.5% 41.4% 56.1% 42.3%
Career — 265/286 3.4 5.2 58.9% 63.2% 47.0% 51.5% 47.6% 56.4% 42.6% — 277/301 0.9 3.4 71.0% 59.3% 46.1% 53.1% 46.9% 55.4% 44.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Dayana Yastremska Laura Siegemund
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 2016 1464 101.4 -1.01 -2.08 0.858 46.1% — — — 20.0% -1.40 0–1 — — +0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2017 1462 104.9 -0.92 +0.23 1.038 50.9% — +57 — 50.0% +0.50 1–1 0–1 — +0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2018 1731 136.1 +1.60 +2.48 1.148 52.9% +20 — — 60.5% +1.03 1–5 (17%) 2–4 (33%) 94.2 -0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2019 1822 150.9 +1.72 +2.31 1.077 51.7% +13 -207 -152 60.2% +0.63 5–9 (36%) 6–5 (55%) 95.7 -1.96 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2020 1792 146.0 +1.19 -0.19 1.016 50.4% +18 -118 — 52.5% +0.16 5–4 (56%) 5–5 (50%) 100.7 -1.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2021 1693 125.3 +1.13 -0.92 1.021 50.3% -17 -2 — 47.7% 0.00 1–7 (13%) 4–4 (50%) 91.7 -0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2022 1614 122.9 -0.45 -2.85 0.874 47.6% +13 +47 +10 43.1% -0.63 5–6 (45%) 7–4 (64%) 100.8 -0.44 2010 1483 96.8 -2.49 -3.75 0.712 41.3% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.13
23 2023 1669 127.5 -3.00 -0.65 0.875 47.1% +26 -37 — 31.3% -1.19 1–5 (17%) 2–4 (33%) 92.8 +0.36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2024 1649 136.0 -0.99 -0.74 0.933 48.8% 0 +39 0 45.1% -0.28 9–5 (64%) 7–5 (58%) 105.5 +1.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2025 1816 146.4 +0.46 -0.46 0.975 49.9% -83 -9 -41 56.5% +0.37 8–9 (47%) 11–3 (79%) 106.2 -1.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2026 1706 127.7 -2.66 -1.59 0.905 48.1% -45 +110 +58 41.3% -0.73 4–9 (31%) 7–4 (64%) 97.2 +0.44 2014 1495 114.5 +1.56 +0.48 1.094 52.5% — +47 — 50.0% +0.75 0–2 0–1 — -0.44
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1530 113.4 -1.13 +2.65 1.082 51.4% +25 0 — 44.0% -0.24 0–3 (0%) 1–2 (33%) 95.0 -0.28
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1747 132.7 +0.58 +2.35 1.047 51.0% -100 +75 -189 56.9% +0.36 11–4 (73%) 3–5 (38%) 106.8 -0.49
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1796 129.1 -1.81 +3.46 1.011 50.2% -247 +119 — 53.3% +0.10 6–6 (50%) 5–7 (42%) 94.0 -1.87
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1693 118.6 -0.34 +1.50 1.020 50.5% -147 +85 — 48.7% +0.23 2–3 (40%) 0–2 — -1.08
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1667 125.7 +0.15 -0.92 0.946 48.8% -73 +57 — 43.2% -0.45 6–5 (55%) 1–4 (20%) 100.0 -0.71
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1789 142.4 +0.10 +1.20 1.003 50.0% -78 +22 — 52.3% +0.30 5–1 (83%) 0–2 — -1.05
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1732 132.3 -1.05 -1.02 0.881 47.5% +5 +47 -144 40.4% -0.75 2–3 (40%) 3–1 (75%) 100.6 -0.72
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1655 117.5 -0.88 -0.51 0.831 46.6% +18 +81 — 25.0% -1.25 1–1 1–2 (33%) — -0.75
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1801 135.1 +1.10 -0.24 1.012 50.5% +3 — — 53.4% +0.31 7–5 (58%) 3–3 (50%) 103.4 -0.31
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1740 133.5 -2.46 +2.44 1.008 50.2% +19 -18 — 53.2% +0.16 6–7 (46%) 6–5 (55%) 97.1 -0.05
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 1804 133.6 -0.54 +1.20 0.998 49.8% -13 -162 -31 49.2% -0.29 5–6 (45%) 4–5 (44%) 98.8 -0.32
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2026 1749 131.9 +0.15 -0.46 0.964 49.2% -22 -29 -39 42.9% -0.41 4–5 (44%) 3–7 (30%) 97.9 -0.21
Career — 1884 142.7 -0.06 -0.20 0.977 49.7% -8 -22 -27 49.8% -0.02 40–61 (40%) 51–39 (57%) 97.0 -0.89 — 1852 137.5 -0.42 +1.03 0.989 49.8% -45 +46 -90 49.0% -0.07 55–51 (52%) 30–46 (39%) 95.4 -2.75

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.