H2H data updated: 2026-10-29 00:00 UTC

Dayana Yastremska vs Madison Brengle H2H: 0-2

Madison Brengle holds a 2–0 lead over Dayana Yastremska in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Madison Brengle leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Madison Brengle won the 2022 Australian Open first round 6-1 0-6 5-0 RET.

Ukraine Age 26 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main-draw meetings
United States Age 36 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Dayana Yastremska #92 2-6 6-2 6-4 Madison Brengle #54 Match data Apr 26, 2022 Q1 Q Madrid Open WTA 1000 Clay
Dayana Yastremska #146 6-1 7-5 Madison Brengle #60 Match data Feb 14, 2022 Q3 Q Dubai Tennis Championships WTA 500 Hard
Madison Brengle #54 6-1 0-6 5-0 (ret.) Dayana Yastremska #144 Match data Jan 19, 2022* R128 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Madison Brengle #84 6-2 6-3 Dayana Yastremska #25 Match data Sep 3, 2020* R64 US Open Grand Slam Hard

2 qualifying meetings shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Dayana Yastremska #97 #21 2,070 1,885 141 154 47.8% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Madison Brengle #178 #35 1,324 1,722 94 152 38.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Dayana Yastremska Madison Brengle
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2016 0–2 0.0% #338 1,463 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2017 2–2 50.0% #184 1,461 0 0 2007 1–3 25.0% #229 1,501 0 0
18 2018 9–7 56.2% #58 1,730 0 1 2008 0–3 0.0% #220 1,456 0 0
19 2019 31–21 59.6% #22 1,822 0 3 2009 1–2 33.3% #165 1,456 0 0
20 2020 14–12 53.8% #29 1,792 0 3 2010 0–1 0.0% #188 1,446 0 0
21 2021 7–12 36.8% #99 1,692 0 3 2011 1–1 50.0% #197 1,459 0 0
22 2022 12–17 41.4% #101 1,614 0 3 2012 0–1 0.0% #191 1,443 0 0
23 2023 5–16 23.8% #102 1,669 0 3 — — — — — — —
24 2024 16–20 44.4% #33 1,648 0 3 2014 4–4 50.0% #95 1,473 0 0
25 2025 30–22 57.7% #27 1,816 0 3 2015 25–26 49.0% #40 1,622 0 0
26 2026 15–23 39.5% #97 1,739 0 3 2016 16–23 41.0% #73 1,591 0 0
27 — — — — — — — 2017 10–18 35.7% #83 1,654 0 0
28 — — — — — — — 2018 3–11 21.4% #88 1,605 0 0
29 — — — — — — — 2019 7–11 38.9% #95 1,601 0 0
30 — — — — — — — 2020 2–4 33.3% #82 1,643 0 0
31 — — — — — — — 2021 6–14 30.0% #59 1,645 0 0
32 — — — — — — — 2022 12–16 42.9% #57 1,630 0 0
33 — — — — — — — 2023 6–14 30.0% #151 1,583 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Dayana Yastremska Madison Brengle
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 2016 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2017 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 2007 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — —
18 2018 9 6 15 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2008 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
19 2019 23 14 37 62.2% 5 4 9 55.6% 3 3 6 50.0% 2009 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
20 2020 10 9 19 52.6% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2010 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 2021 5 11 16 31.3% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2011 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
22 2022 7 10 17 41.2% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 2012 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
23 2023 4 10 14 28.6% 1 6 7 14.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2024 8 13 21 38.1% 5 5 10 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2014 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — —
25 2025 12 13 25 48.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 8 3 11 72.7% 2015 19 16 35 54.3% 6 8 14 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0%
26 2026 10 15 25 40.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 3 3 6 50.0% 2016 10 16 26 38.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 6 14 20 30.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1 7 8 12.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 4 7 11 36.4% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 2 8 10 20.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 10 10 20 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 4 9 13 30.8% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0%
Career — 88 102 190 46.3% 34 36 70 48.6% 19 16 35 54.3% — 65 103 168 38.7% 17 31 48 35.4% 12 18 30 40.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 272/296 of Dayana Yastremska's and 225/246 of Madison Brengle's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Dayana Yastremska Madison Brengle
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 2016 2/2 2.5 6.0 56.2% 65.3% 38.9% 52.3% 24.3% 53.0% 40.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
17 2017 4/4 1.5 3.5 66.0% 50.4% 54.9% 55.8% 51.8% 52.1% 49.7% 2007 4/4 0.8 3.0 60.2% 57.4% 40.8% 48.9% 50.7% 50.5% 41.0%
18 2018 16/16 4.1 5.7 60.7% 65.8% 49.1% 41.8% 42.8% 59.2% 46.9% 2008 2/3 0.0 3.0 66.3% 49.4% 35.3% 12.5% 63.6% 45.2% 37.3%
19 2019 51/52 3.8 5.1 60.2% 65.2% 48.7% 60.0% 48.4% 58.4% 44.8% 2009 3/3 0.0 3.7 61.8% 56.2% 38.6% 41.1% 37.6% 49.3% 43.5%
20 2020 26/26 4.5 5.7 58.9% 67.5% 46.3% 45.5% 47.4% 58.7% 42.0% 2010 1/1 1.0 7.0 53.7% 44.4% 38.7% 50.0% 50.0% 41.8% 47.2%
21 2021 18/19 4.1 5.6 57.9% 66.1% 45.9% 51.1% 42.2% 57.7% 43.3% 2011 2/2 0.5 3.5 63.9% 56.3% 44.7% 38.9% 40.0% 52.0% 35.6%
22 2022 29/29 3.4 5.2 57.8% 63.8% 44.4% 54.0% 49.6% 55.7% 38.7% 2012 1/1 5.0 8.0 65.2% 61.3% 35.0% 30.0% 83.3% 52.2% 41.7%
23 2023 21/21 2.5 5.2 57.8% 59.4% 42.8% 40.6% 53.6% 52.2% 41.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2024 34/36 2.9 4.3 57.8% 60.9% 47.1% 51.9% 44.5% 55.0% 42.0% 2014 7/8 0.7 3.0 66.2% 62.5% 42.8% 49.4% 47.3% 55.7% 44.3%
25 2025 34/53 3.4 5.5 56.3% 63.0% 49.7% 54.0% 51.1% 57.1% 41.8% 2015 35/51 1.7 1.9 66.0% 61.5% 48.8% 42.8% 46.6% 57.2% 41.3%
26 2026 37/38 2.3 4.9 62.4% 60.1% 47.0% 49.2% 45.1% 54.9% 41.5% 2016 37/39 0.9 2.2 68.5% 56.8% 45.7% 46.0% 54.9% 53.2% 43.1%
27 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 28/28 0.1 2.5 73.3% 54.5% 39.2% 43.7% 45.2% 50.6% 44.1%
28 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 14/14 0.4 2.7 66.6% 50.4% 43.5% 42.0% 45.0% 48.4% 43.5%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 18/18 0.2 2.2 73.8% 51.9% 37.5% 39.8% 54.6% 48.3% 47.2%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 6/6 0.2 3.7 72.6% 50.8% 44.5% 45.3% 38.1% 49.0% 48.3%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 20/20 0.0 3.1 74.5% 55.6% 39.8% 42.5% 48.0% 51.4% 44.1%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 27/28 0.4 2.9 73.1% 55.8% 39.7% 41.5% 47.1% 51.3% 44.0%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2023 20/20 0.3 2.7 75.1% 54.6% 41.7% 40.9% 51.5% 51.4% 43.0%
Career — 272/296 3.3 5.2 59.1% 63.2% 47.1% 51.5% 47.4% 56.5% 42.5% — 225/246 0.6 2.6 70.3% 55.9% 42.5% 42.8% 49.1% 52.0% 43.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Dayana Yastremska Madison Brengle
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 2016 1464 101.4 -1.01 -2.08 0.858 46.1% — — — 20.0% -1.40 0–1 — — +0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2017 1462 104.9 -0.92 +0.23 1.038 50.9% — +57 — 50.0% +0.50 1–1 0–1 — +0.10 2007 1502 110.8 0.00 +0.02 0.829 46.5% +15 — — 25.0% -1.75 — — — -0.27
18 2018 1731 136.2 +1.60 +2.48 1.148 52.9% +20 — — 60.5% +1.03 1–5 (17%) 2–4 (33%) 94.2 -0.03 2008 1457 92.1 -3.04 -1.39 0.681 41.4% — — — 14.3% -2.14 0–1 — — +0.43
19 2019 1822 151.0 +1.72 +2.31 1.077 51.7% +13 -207 -152 60.2% +0.63 5–9 (36%) 6–5 (55%) 95.7 -1.96 2009 1456 101.5 -2.95 -0.91 0.858 46.1% — — — 33.3% -1.17 — 0–1 — +0.07
20 2020 1792 146.0 +1.19 -0.19 1.016 50.4% +18 -118 — 52.5% +0.16 5–4 (56%) 5–5 (50%) 100.7 -1.02 2010 1447 99.2 -3.58 -2.65 0.810 44.2% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — 0.00
21 2021 1693 125.3 +1.13 -0.92 1.021 50.3% -17 -2 — 47.7% 0.00 1–7 (13%) 4–4 (50%) 91.7 -0.11 2011 1459 101.5 -2.09 -1.94 0.741 44.6% — — — 50.0% -1.25 — 1–0 — +0.03
22 2022 1614 122.9 -0.45 -2.85 0.874 47.6% +13 +47 +11 43.1% -0.63 5–6 (45%) 7–4 (64%) 100.8 -0.44 2012 1444 99.4 -2.21 +0.67 0.871 47.4% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 1–0 — +0.16
23 2023 1669 127.5 -3.00 -0.65 0.875 47.1% +26 -37 — 31.3% -1.19 1–5 (17%) 2–4 (33%) 92.8 +0.36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2024 1649 136.0 -0.99 -0.74 0.933 48.8% 0 +39 0 45.1% -0.28 9–5 (64%) 7–5 (58%) 105.5 +1.15 2014 1474 113.6 -0.29 +1.12 1.002 50.0% +30 — — 42.9% -0.64 0–2 1–1 — +0.14
25 2025 1817 145.4 +0.41 -0.56 0.975 49.9% -84 -10 -16 56.3% +0.35 8–9 (47%) 11–3 (79%) 106.1 -0.93 2015 1622 128.9 -0.60 -0.18 0.964 49.3% +5 -83 — 48.7% -0.07 7–8 (47%) 6–6 (50%) 100.8 +0.20
26 2026 1739 130.8 -1.85 -1.59 0.919 48.3% -32 +75 +35 42.9% -0.65 6–9 (40%) 8–4 (67%) 99.9 +0.24 2016 1592 127.1 -1.99 +0.54 0.921 48.3% +5 -74 +30 42.4% -0.75 7–6 (54%) 3–2 (60%) 103.3 -1.69
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1654 130.5 -4.01 +1.14 0.892 47.3% -26 -55 -1 38.2% -0.78 6–6 (50%) 3–2 (60%) 102.1 -1.75
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1605 118.6 -4.52 +0.81 0.843 45.8% -20 -29 — 33.3% -1.36 2–5 (29%) 0–2 — -1.35
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1601 115.2 -5.23 +2.99 0.913 47.8% -45 -25 — 42.1% -0.68 0–2 2–1 (67%) — -0.28
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1644 121.9 -2.92 +1.95 0.947 48.8% -1 — — 42.9% -1.07 0–2 2–0 — -0.11
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1645 119.5 -3.17 +0.46 0.907 47.7% +15 -91 +15 34.8% -1.00 2–4 (33%) 0–2 — -0.62
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1631 135.0 -3.81 +1.21 0.902 47.6% +61 -46 -100 42.6% -0.72 3–3 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 101.1 -0.90
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1583 118.6 -4.39 -0.51 0.886 47.1% +13 +7 -81 34.9% -1.26 0–5 (0%) 4–4 (50%) 95.1 -0.79
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 1571 102.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2026 1521 97.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1885 142.5 -0.02 -0.24 0.977 49.7% -8 -26 -24 49.8% -0.03 42–61 (41%) 52–39 (57%) 97.9 -0.88 — 1723 129.4 -2.95 +0.67 0.906 47.8% +6 -59 -13 40.6% -0.76 27–45 (38%) 25–22 (53%) 98.9 -2.76

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.