H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Dayana Yastremska vs Shuai Zhang H2H: 2-3

Shuai Zhang holds a 3–2 lead over Dayana Yastremska in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Dayana Yastremska leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Shuai Zhang leads 2–0 on grass. Most recently, Dayana Yastremska won the 2026 Indian Wells Open first round 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Dayana Yastremska
Ukraine Age 26 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2 – 3
5 main-draw meetings
Shuai Zhang
China Age 37 Right-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Dayana Yastremska #52 6-3 6-2 Shuai Zhang #62 Match data Mar 5, 2026 R128 Indian Wells Open WTA 1000 Hard
Shuai Zhang #54 7-5 6-4 Dayana Yastremska #79 Match data Jun 18, 2022* QF Birmingham WTA 250 Grass
Shuai Zhang #64 3-6 6-3 6-4 Dayana Yastremska #140 Match data Mar 6, 2022* F Lyon WTA 250 Hard
Shuai Zhang #50 6-4 1-6 6-2 Dayana Yastremska #35 Match data Jul 9, 2019* R16 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Dayana Yastremska #102 7-5 6-4 Shuai Zhang #40 Match data Oct 13, 2018* SF Hong Kong Open International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Dayana Yastremska #113 #21 2,070 1,884 135 150 47.4% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Shuai Zhang #54 #22 1,905 1,857 232 294 44.1% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Dayana Yastremska Shuai Zhang
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2016 0–2 0.0% #338 1,463 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2017 2–2 50.0% #184 1,461 0 0 2006 0–1 0.0% #203 1,495 0 0
18 2018 9–7 56.2% #58 1,730 0 1 2007 0–3 0.0% #149 1,464 0 0
19 2019 31–21 59.6% #22 1,822 0 3 2008 0–6 0.0% #235 1,412 0 0
20 2020 14–12 53.8% #29 1,792 0 3 2009 2–1 66.7% #154 1,467 0 0
21 2021 7–12 36.8% #99 1,692 0 3 2010 3–4 42.9% #90 1,492 0 0
22 2022 12–17 41.4% #101 1,614 0 3 2011 8–22 26.7% #126 1,445 0 0
23 2023 5–16 23.8% #102 1,669 0 3 2012 2–6 25.0% #127 1,457 0 0
24 2024 16–20 44.4% #33 1,648 0 3 2013 9–4 69.2% #52 1,598 0 1
25 2025 28–21 57.1% #27 1,816 0 3 2014 18–24 42.9% #61 1,600 0 1
26 2026 11–20 35.5% #113 1,705 0 3 2015 4–12 25.0% #139 1,518 0 1
27 — — — — — — — 2016 26–21 55.3% #23 1,774 0 1
28 — — — — — — — 2017 23–24 48.9% #36 1,774 0 2
29 — — — — — — — 2018 28–27 50.9% #40 1,726 0 2
30 — — — — — — — 2019 18–23 43.9% #40 1,681 0 2
31 — — — — — — — 2020 12–10 54.5% #35 1,733 0 2
32 — — — — — — — 2021 15–24 38.5% #60 1,631 0 2
33 — — — — — — — 2022 34–26 56.7% #25 1,733 0 3
34 — — — — — — — 2023 4–18 18.2% #245 1,524 0 3
35 — — — — — — — 2024 5–12 29.4% #205 1,574 0 3
36 — — — — — — — 2025 10–7 58.8% #81 1,731 0 3
37 — — — — — — — 2026 11–19 36.7% #54 1,698 0 3

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Dayana Yastremska Shuai Zhang
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 2016 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2017 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 2006 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
18 2018 9 6 15 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2007 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 2019 23 14 37 62.2% 5 4 9 55.6% 3 3 6 50.0% 2008 0 5 5 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
20 2020 10 9 19 52.6% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2009 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — —
21 2021 5 11 16 31.3% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2010 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
22 2022 7 10 17 41.2% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 2011 7 17 24 29.2% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 2023 4 10 14 28.6% 1 6 7 14.3% — — — — 2012 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
24 2024 8 13 21 38.1% 5 5 10 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2013 8 3 11 72.7% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
25 2025 12 13 25 48.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 6 2 8 75.0% 2014 10 15 25 40.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
26 2026 6 12 18 33.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 3 3 6 50.0% 2015 1 6 7 14.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 24 15 39 61.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 18 14 32 56.3% 3 7 10 30.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 22 19 41 53.7% 6 6 12 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 11 15 26 42.3% 1 4 5 20.0% 6 4 10 60.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 7 7 14 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 6 13 19 31.6% 4 8 12 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 22 15 37 59.5% 4 8 12 33.3% 8 3 11 72.7%
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 4 10 14 28.6% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0%
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 5 10 15 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 9 5 14 64.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2026 7 9 16 43.8% 3 7 10 30.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
Career — 84 99 183 45.9% 34 36 70 48.6% 17 15 32 53.1% — 168 191 359 46.8% 38 72 110 34.5% 26 31 57 45.6%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 265/286 of Dayana Yastremska's and 495/529 of Shuai Zhang's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Dayana Yastremska Shuai Zhang
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 2016 2/2 2.5 6.0 56.2% 65.3% 38.9% 52.3% 24.3% 53.0% 40.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
17 2017 4/4 1.5 3.5 66.0% 50.4% 54.9% 55.8% 51.8% 52.1% 49.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2018 16/16 4.1 5.7 60.7% 65.8% 49.1% 41.8% 42.8% 59.2% 46.9% 2007 1/3 0.0 2.0 55.8% 62.1% 39.1% 42.9% 100.0% 51.9% 22.7%
19 2019 51/52 3.8 5.1 60.2% 65.2% 48.7% 60.0% 48.4% 58.4% 44.8% 2008 6/6 0.8 3.2 68.8% 53.0% 45.1% 47.6% 38.3% 50.3% 38.5%
20 2020 26/26 4.5 5.7 58.9% 67.5% 46.3% 45.5% 47.4% 58.7% 42.0% 2009 2/3 0.0 4.0 65.6% 47.9% 49.0% 39.4% 37.9% 48.5% 42.7%
21 2021 18/19 4.1 5.6 57.9% 66.1% 45.9% 51.1% 42.2% 57.7% 43.3% 2010 6/7 0.2 5.3 72.2% 51.8% 31.0% 48.7% 46.7% 46.1% 42.2%
22 2022 29/29 3.4 5.2 57.8% 63.8% 44.4% 54.0% 49.6% 55.7% 38.7% 2011 28/30 0.6 2.5 69.3% 54.9% 39.3% 47.4% 41.5% 50.2% 39.4%
23 2023 21/21 2.5 5.2 57.8% 59.4% 42.8% 40.6% 53.6% 52.2% 41.9% 2012 8/8 1.1 3.0 64.8% 56.8% 35.6% 43.8% 44.0% 49.6% 41.2%
24 2024 34/36 2.9 4.3 57.8% 60.9% 47.1% 51.9% 44.5% 55.0% 42.0% 2013 11/13 1.5 1.5 64.9% 68.1% 47.0% 62.4% 49.6% 60.4% 48.0%
25 2025 34/50 3.4 5.5 56.3% 63.0% 49.7% 54.0% 51.1% 57.1% 41.8% 2014 38/42 1.2 1.9 68.5% 57.4% 45.2% 51.5% 49.8% 53.8% 43.0%
26 2026 30/31 2.2 5.1 61.3% 59.5% 46.4% 48.9% 46.5% 54.2% 41.4% 2015 14/16 1.6 2.8 66.9% 60.1% 45.8% 51.2% 59.4% 55.0% 42.9%
27 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 38/50 0.9 1.7 66.2% 58.7% 48.2% 49.5% 56.1% 55.2% 45.5%
28 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 44/47 2.9 2.7 63.5% 65.5% 43.9% 54.0% 49.5% 57.6% 44.3%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 55/55 2.3 2.6 63.7% 63.6% 46.9% 52.4% 47.8% 57.3% 43.7%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 41/41 2.1 2.8 62.7% 62.5% 44.0% 51.7% 47.7% 55.7% 41.9%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 22/22 2.0 2.5 67.4% 61.9% 48.0% 48.9% 50.6% 57.2% 43.0%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 39/39 1.5 2.9 64.7% 59.8% 43.1% 53.0% 43.0% 54.0% 39.9%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 58/60 2.1 2.2 65.7% 64.3% 48.1% 45.8% 47.7% 58.8% 42.2%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2023 22/22 1.2 2.9 61.1% 57.6% 39.6% 41.4% 52.3% 50.6% 37.3%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2024 17/17 1.5 2.1 64.9% 61.4% 43.5% 45.0% 40.9% 55.0% 39.3%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2025 15/18 2.6 2.9 67.0% 60.0% 39.9% 39.2% 47.8% 53.4% 45.4%
37 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2026 30/30 1.4 2.1 68.8% 60.1% 47.4% 54.3% 41.8% 56.1% 39.5%
Career — 265/286 3.4 5.2 58.9% 63.2% 47.0% 51.5% 47.6% 56.4% 42.6% — 495/530 1.7 2.5 65.6% 60.9% 44.8% 49.9% 48.0% 55.3% 42.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Dayana Yastremska Shuai Zhang
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 2016 1464 101.4 -1.01 -2.08 0.858 46.1% — — — 20.0% -1.40 0–1 — — +0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2017 1462 104.9 -0.92 +0.23 1.038 50.9% — +57 — 50.0% +0.50 1–1 0–1 — +0.10 2006 1495 104.8 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 — — -0.25
18 2018 1731 136.1 +1.60 +2.48 1.148 52.9% +20 — — 60.5% +1.03 1–5 (17%) 2–4 (33%) 94.2 -0.03 2007 1464 103.0 -1.60 +0.26 0.473 38.5% +16 — — 0.0% -2.67 — 0–1 — -0.21
19 2019 1822 150.9 +1.72 +2.31 1.077 51.7% +13 -207 -152 60.2% +0.63 5–9 (36%) 6–5 (55%) 95.7 -1.96 2008 1413 101.8 -1.83 -2.28 0.775 44.3% +21 — — 14.3% -2.21 0–2 0–2 — -0.06
20 2020 1792 146.0 +1.19 -0.19 1.016 50.4% +18 -118 — 52.5% +0.16 5–4 (56%) 5–5 (50%) 100.7 -1.02 2009 1468 120.7 +2.65 +2.50 0.830 45.6% +21 — — 66.7% +0.33 — 1–0 — -0.05
21 2021 1693 125.3 +1.13 -0.92 1.021 50.3% -17 -2 — 47.7% 0.00 1–7 (13%) 4–4 (50%) 91.7 -0.11 2010 1492 103.6 -3.51 -1.21 0.783 44.3% +26 — — 37.5% -1.19 2–0 1–1 — +0.51
22 2022 1614 122.9 -0.45 -2.85 0.874 47.6% +13 +47 +10 43.1% -0.63 5–6 (45%) 7–4 (64%) 100.8 -0.44 2011 1445 108.6 -4.27 -3.16 0.790 44.9% +24 +34 — 30.8% -1.57 3–4 (43%) 1–6 (14%) 96.1 -0.05
23 2023 1669 127.5 -3.00 -0.65 0.875 47.1% +26 -37 — 31.3% -1.19 1–5 (17%) 2–4 (33%) 92.8 +0.36 2012 1457 113.5 -2.34 +0.08 0.817 45.5% +14 — — 23.5% -1.71 1–0 0–1 — -0.17
24 2024 1649 136.0 -0.99 -0.74 0.933 48.8% 0 +39 0 45.1% -0.28 9–5 (64%) 7–5 (58%) 105.5 +1.15 2013 1599 123.5 +2.33 +1.26 1.212 54.5% -6 — — 70.4% +1.52 0–1 2–0 — +0.48
25 2025 1816 146.4 +0.46 -0.46 0.975 49.9% -83 -9 -41 56.5% +0.37 8–9 (47%) 11–3 (79%) 106.2 -1.02 2014 1600 117.2 -1.75 -0.53 0.931 48.5% -53 -65 +35 42.9% -0.46 10–6 (63%) 4–4 (50%) 105.2 +0.61
26 2026 1706 127.7 -2.66 -1.59 0.905 48.1% -45 +111 +58 41.3% -0.73 4–9 (31%) 7–4 (64%) 97.2 +0.44 2015 1518 110.7 -2.05 -0.11 0.952 48.8% -20 -5 — 33.3% -0.83 0–4 (0%) 0–3 (0%) 92.0 -0.54
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1775 138.9 -0.62 +2.34 1.016 50.3% +20 -282 — 52.6% +0.18 8–1 (89%) 5–6 (45%) 106.8 -0.50
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1775 137.4 +0.89 +0.70 1.045 51.0% +50 -290 -233 50.9% +0.34 8–10 (44%) 7–8 (47%) 99.0 +0.05
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1727 132.0 +0.70 +0.72 1.025 50.7% +26 -168 — 52.4% +0.02 5–9 (36%) 9–8 (53%) 96.6 +2.55
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1682 131.5 -0.59 -1.30 0.946 49.1% -17 -99 -24 47.7% -0.17 4–6 (40%) 5–1 (83%) 102.8 +0.27
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1733 131.8 0.00 +0.35 1.003 50.0% -62 -39 — 52.0% -0.06 4–2 (67%) 5–3 (63%) 104.9 -0.07
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1632 116.8 -1.99 -2.77 0.869 47.1% -13 -16 +97 43.2% -0.80 2–5 (29%) 5–3 (63%) 97.9 +0.69
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1733 139.5 +1.53 -0.47 1.023 50.4% -6 -140 +117 53.4% +0.09 6–2 (75%) 11–8 (58%) 106.7 +1.01
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1524 112.2 -4.74 -4.13 0.755 43.8% +90 -25 +193 28.3% -1.61 1–5 (17%) 1–2 (33%) 94.2 +0.93
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1575 131.2 -0.87 -2.36 0.873 47.3% +48 — — 35.1% -1.08 0–3 (0%) 2–1 (67%) 97.8 -0.76
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 1731 134.6 -2.26 +1.21 0.975 49.2% +29 — — 50.0% -0.25 6–0 (100%) 1–2 (33%) 108.2 -1.06
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2026 1698 130.8 -0.76 -1.93 0.899 47.7% +2 -169 +62 39.7% -0.74 3–5 (38%) 4–1 (80%) 100.8 -0.18
Career — 1884 142.7 -0.06 -0.20 0.977 49.7% -8 -22 -27 49.8% -0.02 40–61 (40%) 51–39 (57%) 97.0 -0.88 — 1858 134.2 -0.75 -0.61 0.945 48.8% +10 -114 +39 45.4% -0.37 63–66 (49%) 64–61 (51%) 103.1 +0.61

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.