H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:32 UTC
Diana Shnaider vs Magdalena Frech H2H: 3-1
Diana Shnaider holds a 3–1 lead over Magdalena Frech in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Diana Shnaider leads 2–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Diana Shnaider won the 2025 Queens third round 6-4 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 22
Left-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
POL
Age 28
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 10, 2025 | Queens | WTA 500 | R32 | Grass | Diana Shnaider | 6-4 6-1 | Magdalena Frech | Match data |
| Feb 17, 2025 | Dubai | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Diana Shnaider | 6-2 6-2 | Magdalena Frech | Match data |
| Sep 30, 2024* | Beijing | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Magdalena Frech | 0-6 6-3 6-4 | Diana Shnaider | Match data |
| Aug 9, 2024* | Toronto | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Diana Shnaider | 2-6 6-3 7-6(5) | Magdalena Frech | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Diana Shnaider | #18 | #12 | 3,108 | 1,965 | 104 | 72 | 59.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
| Magdalena Frech | #44 | #22 | 2,020 | 1,874 | 86 | 131 | 39.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Diana Shnaider | Magdalena Frech | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #520 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #490 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2023 | 16–11 | 59.3% | #93 | 1,671 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #172 | 1,434 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2024 | 42–20 | 67.7% | #13 | 1,942 | 0 | 4 | 2018 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #160 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2025 | 27–26 | 50.9% | #21 | 1,841 | 0 | 5 | 2019 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #188 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2026 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #18 | 1,874 | 0 | 5 | 2020 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #156 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #106 | 1,702 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #106 | 1,688 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #74 | 1,687 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 29–25 | 53.7% | #25 | 1,845 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 15–25 | 37.5% | #59 | 1,748 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #44 | 1,682 | 0 | 1 |