H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Dinara Safina vs Maria Kirilenko H2H: 2-2
Dinara Safina and Maria Kirilenko are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Maria Kirilenko leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Dinara Safina leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Dinara Safina won the 2010 Seoul fourth round 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 40
Right-Handed
182 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 39
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 24, 2010* | Seoul | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Dinara Safina | 6-2 6-3 | Maria Kirilenko | Match data |
| Aug 28, 2010* | New Haven | WTA 500 | QF | Hard | Maria Kirilenko | 6-3 6-3 | Dinara Safina | Match data |
| Jan 26, 2010* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R16 | Hard | Maria Kirilenko | 5-4 (ret.) | Dinara Safina | Match data |
| Jun 13, 2005 | S Hertogenbosch | WTA 250 | R16 | Grass | Dinara Safina | 6-4 7-6(2) | Maria Kirilenko | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dinara Safina | #452 | #1 | 10,521 | 2,120 | 299 | 160 | 65.1% | 0 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 11 |
| Maria Kirilenko | #947 | #10 | 3,471 | 1,910 | 282 | 228 | 55.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Dinara Safina | Maria Kirilenko | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #373 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 2002 | 12–5 | 70.6% | #68 | 1,667 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #124 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2003 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #54 | 1,749 | 0 | 2 | 2004 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #107 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2004 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #44 | 1,713 | 0 | 2 | 2005 | 29–21 | 58.0% | #25 | 1,741 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 2005 | 37–19 | 66.1% | #20 | 1,839 | 0 | 4 | 2006 | 23–25 | 47.9% | #30 | 1,656 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 2006 | 44–21 | 67.7% | #11 | 1,871 | 0 | 4 | 2007 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #25 | 1,739 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 2007 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #15 | 1,862 | 0 | 4 | 2008 | 34–22 | 60.7% | #29 | 1,722 | 0 | 5 |
| 22 | 2008 | 51–18 | 73.9% | #3 | 2,020 | 0 | 8 | 2009 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #62 | 1,719 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | 2009 | 55–16 | 77.5% | #2 | 1,951 | 0 | 11 | 2010 | 37–23 | 61.7% | #20 | 1,827 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 2010 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #63 | 1,795 | 0 | 11 | 2011 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #28 | 1,816 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 2011 | 11–9 | 55.0% | #132 | 1,783 | 0 | 11 | 2012 | 29–20 | 59.2% | #14 | 1,775 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 34–18 | 65.4% | #19 | 1,786 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #187 | 1,698 | 0 | 6 |