H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC
Dominika Cibulkova vs Agnes Szavay: 2–2 excluding walkovers; 3–2 including 1 walkover. Across 5 main-draw results including walkovers, Dominika Cibulkova leads 2–1 on clay, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Dominika Cibulkova won the 2011 Madrid Open round of 32 W/O.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dominika Cibulkova | (w/o) | Agnes Szavay | Match data | May 5, 2011* | R32 | Madrid Open | Premier Mandatory → modern equivalent WTA 1000 | Clay |
| Dominika Cibulkova | 3-6 6-3 6-3 | Agnes Szavay | Match data | Mar 6, 2010* | QF | Monterrey Open | International → modern equivalent WTA 250 | Hard |
| Dominika Cibulkova | 6-2 6-4 | Agnes Szavay | Match data | Jun 2, 2009* | R16 | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | Clay |
| Agnes Szavay | 7-6(4) 6-4 | Dominika Cibulkova | Match data | Sep 21, 2007* | R16 | China Open | Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 | Hard |
| Agnes Szavay | 7-5 6-0 | Dominika Cibulkova | Match data | Jul 27, 2007* | R16 | Bad Gastein | Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 | Clay |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dominika Cibulkova | #315 | #4 | 5,245 | 1,964 | 368 | 265 | 58.1% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 8 |
| Agnes Szavay | #1,023 | #13 | 2,059 | 1,837 | 116 | 92 | 55.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Dominika Cibulkova | Agnes Szavay | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #186 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2006 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #153 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #189 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2007 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #51 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 29–10 | 74.4% | #20 | 1,816 | 0 | 2 |
| 19 | 2008 | 36–26 | 58.1% | #19 | 1,843 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 26–25 | 51.0% | #28 | 1,659 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 2009 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #28 | 1,735 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #39 | 1,710 | 0 | 3 |
| 21 | 2010 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #31 | 1,753 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 30–19 | 61.2% | #37 | 1,785 | 0 | 5 |
| 22 | 2011 | 41–21 | 66.1% | #18 | 1,894 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #259 | 1,721 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | 2012 | 34–26 | 56.7% | #15 | 1,790 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #1015 | 1,659 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 2013 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #23 | 1,734 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2014 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #10 | 1,719 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2015 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #38 | 1,756 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2016 | 53–21 | 71.6% | #5 | 1,951 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2017 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #26 | 1,778 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2018 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #25 | 1,872 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2019 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #315 | 1,755 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Dominika Cibulkova | Agnes Szavay | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2006 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2007 | 10 | 12 | 22 | 45.5% | 7 | 5 | 12 | 58.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 15 | 4 | 19 | 78.9% | 13 | 4 | 17 | 76.5% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 19 | 2008 | 27 | 18 | 45 | 60.0% | 8 | 6 | 14 | 57.1% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 2008 | 5 | 16 | 21 | 23.8% | 14 | 7 | 21 | 66.7% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | 4 | 1 | 5 | 80.0% |
| 20 | 2009 | 7 | 10 | 17 | 41.2% | 11 | 5 | 16 | 68.8% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 8 | 15 | 23 | 34.8% | 14 | 5 | 19 | 73.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 21 | 2010 | 18 | 18 | 36 | 50.0% | 8 | 4 | 12 | 66.7% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 13 | 11 | 24 | 54.2% | 14 | 5 | 19 | 73.7% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% |
| 22 | 2011 | 29 | 15 | 44 | 65.9% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 7 | 2 | 9 | 77.8% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 2011 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2012 | 19 | 17 | 36 | 52.8% | 13 | 6 | 19 | 68.4% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2013 | 19 | 15 | 34 | 55.9% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2014 | 29 | 17 | 46 | 63.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2015 | 17 | 14 | 31 | 54.8% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2016 | 37 | 17 | 54 | 68.5% | 7 | 3 | 10 | 70.0% | 9 | 1 | 10 | 90.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2017 | 22 | 15 | 37 | 59.5% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2018 | 18 | 11 | 29 | 62.1% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2019 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 254 | 185 | 439 | 57.9% | 72 | 53 | 125 | 57.6% | 39 | 24 | 63 | 61.9% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | — | 43 | 51 | 94 | 45.7% | 62 | 31 | 93 | 66.7% | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 558/630 of Dominika Cibulkova's and 164/196 of Agnes Szavay's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Dominika Cibulkova | Agnes Szavay | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 18 | 2007 | 23/34 | 0.3 | 3.9 | 62.2% | 56.6% | 46.2% | 51.0% | 47.4% | 52.3% | 45.7% | 2007 | 25/39 | 3.7 | 3.2 | 57.7% | 69.6% | 49.8% | 52.7% | 43.3% | 60.9% | 46.4% |
| 19 | 2008 | 56/62 | 0.8 | 2.7 | 68.4% | 60.8% | 48.3% | 54.4% | 46.5% | 56.7% | 46.6% | 2008 | 44/51 | 1.8 | 5.4 | 60.2% | 64.6% | 44.6% | 54.0% | 47.7% | 56.2% | 45.4% |
| 20 | 2009 | 36/37 | 0.6 | 3.3 | 67.4% | 60.0% | 49.3% | 52.6% | 53.6% | 56.4% | 46.9% | 2009 | 38/44 | 1.7 | 4.8 | 63.0% | 59.6% | 44.4% | 47.3% | 43.7% | 54.0% | 45.5% |
| 21 | 2010 | 50/54 | 1.1 | 3.7 | 63.2% | 60.8% | 46.2% | 53.9% | 50.9% | 55.6% | 43.9% | 2010 | 47/49 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 68.3% | 62.5% | 46.0% | 49.4% | 52.7% | 57.3% | 48.0% |
| 22 | 2011 | 53/62 | 1.1 | 4.2 | 56.1% | 64.9% | 46.5% | 54.6% | 53.9% | 56.8% | 48.0% | 2011 | 9/10 | 1.2 | 2.6 | 66.1% | 61.2% | 42.0% | 42.4% | 44.7% | 54.3% | 45.3% |
| 23 | 2012 | 52/60 | 1.5 | 4.2 | 54.2% | 66.3% | 45.8% | 50.4% | 53.3% | 56.4% | 48.0% | 2012 | 1/3 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 58.1% | 62.8% | 45.2% | 44.4% | 26.7% | 55.4% | 43.2% |
| 24 | 2013 | 45/50 | 0.9 | 4.8 | 60.8% | 61.9% | 44.4% | 53.5% | 44.6% | 55.1% | 45.9% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2014 | 51/55 | 0.8 | 4.3 | 66.5% | 62.6% | 45.5% | 57.1% | 50.5% | 57.0% | 47.7% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2015 | 24/35 | 1.0 | 4.1 | 67.0% | 61.0% | 48.2% | 53.0% | 43.9% | 56.6% | 43.0% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2016 | 67/74 | 1.0 | 3.2 | 66.4% | 62.7% | 47.5% | 54.7% | 50.3% | 57.8% | 48.0% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2017 | 46/48 | 0.8 | 2.9 | 66.1% | 62.2% | 48.0% | 55.2% | 49.2% | 57.4% | 45.5% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2018 | 45/48 | 1.1 | 3.9 | 65.2% | 63.3% | 48.4% | 55.6% | 48.6% | 58.1% | 44.3% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2019 | 10/11 | 0.9 | 4.5 | 66.1% | 58.8% | 45.1% | 54.3% | 40.4% | 54.2% | 38.4% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 558/634 | 0.9 | 3.7 | 63.5% | 62.2% | 46.9% | 54.0% | 49.6% | 56.5% | 46.2% | — | 164/208 | 2.1 | 4.1 | 63.1% | 63.4% | 45.6% | 50.2% | 47.2% | 56.6% | 46.3% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Dominika Cibulkova | Agnes Szavay | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 1496 | 105.8 | — | — | — | — | — | +62 | — | 50.0% | -0.35 | 0–2 | — | — | +0.52 |
| 17 | 2006 | 1506 | 100.7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 40.0% | -0.20 | 2–0 | 1–1 | — | +0.22 | 2006 | 1482 | 92.2 | — | — | — | — | — | +61 | — | 37.5% | -1.12 | 1–1 | — | — | +0.25 |
| 18 | 2007 | 1606 | 123.4 | -2.75 | +1.36 | 0.957 | 49.0% | -43 | +45 | — | 48.7% | +0.04 | 6–4 (60%) | 4–6 (40%) | 103.8 | +0.03 | 2007 | 1817 | 139.5 | +3.34 | +1.55 | 1.188 | 53.7% | -85 | -83 | — | 75.3% | +1.84 | 3–2 (60%) | 5–3 (63%) | 104.5 | +2.78 |
| 19 | 2008 | 1844 | 155.6 | +2.09 | +2.87 | 1.075 | 51.6% | -8 | -147 | — | 59.4% | +0.56 | 10–9 (53%) | 8–3 (73%) | 108.8 | -3.69 | 2008 | 1659 | 126.3 | +0.68 | +0.73 | 1.037 | 50.9% | -68 | +101 | -7 | 50.4% | +0.04 | 9–10 (47%) | 8–6 (57%) | 98.5 | +2.79 |
| 20 | 2009 | 1735 | 137.2 | +0.81 | +1.93 | 1.075 | 51.5% | -29 | +84 | -128 | 59.0% | +0.64 | 4–6 (40%) | 4–4 (50%) | 97.6 | +0.20 | 2009 | 1710 | 134.5 | -0.66 | +1.84 | 0.988 | 49.6% | -134 | +198 | — | 49.5% | -0.23 | 8–9 (47%) | 3–3 (50%) | 100.3 | -0.22 |
| 21 | 2010 | 1754 | 142.7 | +0.27 | +0.68 | 0.989 | 49.8% | -26 | +62 | -79 | 54.4% | +0.28 | 9–8 (53%) | 8–2 (80%) | 105.0 | +0.39 | 2010 | 1786 | 142.5 | +0.86 | +3.56 | 1.125 | 52.6% | -81 | +154 | -165 | 60.0% | +0.90 | 12–8 (60%) | 2–7 (22%) | 99.3 | +0.13 |
| 22 | 2011 | 1894 | 146.9 | +1.53 | +4.23 | 1.113 | 52.5% | -32 | -107 | -88 | 61.0% | +0.76 | 15–7 (68%) | 9–5 (64%) | 108.0 | -1.26 | 2011 | 1721 | 117.3 | -0.84 | +0.06 | 0.990 | 49.6% | -18 | +145 | — | 50.0% | -0.05 | 2–2 (50%) | 2–0 | — | +0.02 |
| 23 | 2012 | 1791 | 146.5 | +0.57 | +4.09 | 1.101 | 52.3% | -2 | +69 | -30 | 59.1% | +0.78 | 6–11 (35%) | 10–4 (71%) | 97.7 | +0.95 | 2012 | 1659 | 98.0 | -1.90 | -1.71 | 0.969 | 49.0% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.25 | — | 0–1 | — | +0.42 |
| 24 | 2013 | 1735 | 139.1 | +0.40 | +2.51 | 1.022 | 50.5% | +15 | +39 | +28 | 51.7% | +0.30 | 11–7 (61%) | 6–7 (46%) | 98.9 | +0.89 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2014 | 1719 | 152.6 | +1.29 | +4.23 | 1.109 | 52.3% | +50 | +17 | +28 | 59.8% | +0.75 | 9–9 (50%) | 6–7 (46%) | 96.4 | -0.25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2015 | 1757 | 143.5 | -0.51 | +1.77 | 0.989 | 49.9% | +26 | — | -24 | 50.6% | +0.07 | 8–5 (62%) | 6–4 (60%) | 105.0 | -0.11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2016 | 1952 | 148.1 | +2.12 | +4.65 | 1.136 | 52.9% | -29 | -154 | -64 | 65.1% | +0.91 | 19–10 (66%) | 9–6 (60%) | 108.8 | -1.07 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2017 | 1778 | 142.2 | +1.03 | +1.88 | 1.067 | 51.5% | +59 | -13 | +40 | 55.3% | +0.37 | 9–11 (45%) | 5–5 (50%) | 93.4 | +2.63 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2018 | 1872 | 145.7 | +1.54 | +1.61 | 1.058 | 51.3% | +3 | -108 | -24 | 58.3% | +0.53 | 7–7 (50%) | 7–5 (58%) | 101.4 | -0.82 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2019 | 1755 | 115.9 | -0.72 | -0.79 | 0.839 | 46.7% | +34 | -72 | — | 29.6% | -1.19 | 1–4 (20%) | 0–1 | — | -0.69 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1964 | 150.3 | +0.95 | +2.81 | 1.063 | 51.4% | 0 | -11 | -38 | 57.0% | +0.50 | 116–98 (54%) | 83–60 (58%) | 107.2 | -0.41 | — | 1838 | 136.4 | +0.73 | +1.87 | 1.067 | 51.4% | -89 | +96 | -75 | 56.0% | +0.42 | 35–34 (51%) | 20–20 (50%) | 99.2 | +3.25 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caroline Wozniacki | 4 | 10 | 14 | Sep 23, 2017 | H2H |
| Victoria Azarenka | 5 | 8 | 13 | Mar 21, 2019 | H2H |
| Angelique Kerber | 6 | 6 | 12 | Sep 2, 2018 | H2H |
| Agnieszka Radwanska | 6 | 6 | 12 | Jul 5, 2016 | H2H |
| Alizé Cornet | 7 | 3 | 10 | Jul 4, 2018 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Flavia Pennetta | 2 | 4 | 6 | Sep 2, 2010 | H2H |
| Dominika Cibulkova | 2 | 3 | 5 | May 5, 2011 | H2H |
| Svetlana Kuznetsova | 0 | 5 | 5 | Apr 8, 2011 | H2H |
| Tathiana Garbin | 3 | 2 | 5 | Jul 10, 2009 | H2H |
| Olga Govortsova | 3 | 1 | 4 | May 24, 2011 | H2H |