H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Dominika Cibulkova vs Andrea Sestini Hlavackova H2H: 1-1
Dominika Cibulkova and Andrea Sestini Hlavackova are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Dominika Cibulkova leads 1–0 on clay, while Andrea Sestini Hlavackova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Andrea Sestini Hlavackova won the 2012 Cincinnati third round 7-6(1) 4-1 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SVK
Age 37
Right-Handed
161 cm / 5'3"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 39
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 16, 2012* | Cincinnati | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Andrea Sestini Hlavackova | 7-6(1) 4-1 (ret.) | Dominika Cibulkova | Match data |
| May 11, 2007* | Prague | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Dominika Cibulkova | 6-1 6-3 | Andrea Sestini Hlavackova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dominika Cibulkova | #315 | #4 | 5,245 | 1,966 | 365 | 261 | 58.3% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 8 |
| Andrea Sestini Hlavackova | #602 | #58 | 1,055 | 1,641 | 37 | 62 | 37.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Dominika Cibulkova | Andrea Sestini Hlavackova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2006 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #153 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2007 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #51 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #311 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2008 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #19 | 1,840 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2009 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #28 | 1,733 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #242 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2010 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #31 | 1,753 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2011 | 41–21 | 66.1% | #18 | 1,893 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2012 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #15 | 1,810 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #100 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2013 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #23 | 1,738 | 0 | 3 | 2011 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #116 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2014 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #10 | 1,721 | 0 | 4 | 2012 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #64 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2015 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #38 | 1,757 | 0 | 4 | 2013 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #134 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2016 | 53–21 | 71.6% | #5 | 1,951 | 0 | 8 | 2014 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #166 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2017 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #26 | 1,778 | 0 | 8 | 2015 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #161 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2018 | 27–18 | 60.0% | #25 | 1,865 | 0 | 8 | 2016 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #284 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2019 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #315 | 1,764 | 0 | 8 | 2017 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #480 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 |