H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Dominika Cibulkova vs Maria Kirilenko H2H: 1-2
Maria Kirilenko holds a 2–1 lead over Dominika Cibulkova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Maria Kirilenko leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Dominika Cibulkova won the 2011 Sydney third round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SVK
Age 37
Right-Handed
161 cm / 5'3"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 39
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 13, 2011* | Sydney | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Dominika Cibulkova | 6-3 6-3 | Maria Kirilenko | Match data |
| Aug 18, 2010* | Montreal | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Maria Kirilenko | 6-0 6-3 | Dominika Cibulkova | Match data |
| May 7, 2010* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R16 | Clay | Maria Kirilenko | 4-6 6-1 6-1 | Dominika Cibulkova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dominika Cibulkova | #315 | #4 | 5,245 | 1,966 | 365 | 261 | 58.3% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 8 |
| Maria Kirilenko | #947 | #10 | 3,471 | 1,910 | 282 | 228 | 55.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Dominika Cibulkova | Maria Kirilenko | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #373 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #124 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2006 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #153 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #107 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2007 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #51 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 29–21 | 58.0% | #25 | 1,741 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 2008 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #19 | 1,840 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 23–25 | 47.9% | #30 | 1,656 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 2009 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #28 | 1,733 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #25 | 1,739 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 2010 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #31 | 1,753 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 34–22 | 60.7% | #29 | 1,722 | 0 | 5 |
| 22 | 2011 | 41–21 | 66.1% | #18 | 1,893 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #62 | 1,719 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | 2012 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #15 | 1,810 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 37–23 | 61.7% | #20 | 1,827 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 2013 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #23 | 1,738 | 0 | 3 | 2011 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #28 | 1,816 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 2014 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #10 | 1,721 | 0 | 4 | 2012 | 29–20 | 59.2% | #14 | 1,775 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 2015 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #38 | 1,757 | 0 | 4 | 2013 | 34–18 | 65.4% | #19 | 1,786 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 2016 | 53–21 | 71.6% | #5 | 1,951 | 0 | 8 | 2014 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #187 | 1,698 | 0 | 6 |
| 28 | 2017 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #26 | 1,778 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2018 | 27–18 | 60.0% | #25 | 1,865 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2019 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #315 | 1,764 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |