H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Dominika Cibulkova vs Na Li H2H: 0-7

Na Li holds a 7–0 lead over Dominika Cibulkova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Na Li leads 5–0 on hard courts and 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Na Li won the 2014 Miami Open semifinal 7-5 2-6 6-3.

SVK Age 37 Right-Handed 161 cm / 5'3"
H2H
0 7
7 main draw meetings
CHN Age 44 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Na Li #2 7-5 2-6 6-3 Dominika Cibulkova #11 Match data Mar 22, 2014* SF Miami Open Premier Mandatory modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Na Li #2 6-3 4-6 6-3 Dominika Cibulkova #11 Match data Mar 12, 2014* QF Indian Wells Open Premier Mandatory modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Na Li #3 7-6(3) 6-0 Dominika Cibulkova #13 Match data Jan 27, 2014* F Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Na Li #5 7-6(1) 6-2 Dominika Cibulkova #20 Match data Aug 10, 2013* QF Canadian Open Premier 5 modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Na Li #9 6-1 7-6(4) Dominika Cibulkova #17 Match data May 19, 2012* QF Italian Open Premier 5 modern equivalent WTA 1000 Clay
Na Li #13 6-2 3-6 7-5 Dominika Cibulkova #27 Match data May 12, 2010* R32 Madrid Open Premier Mandatory modern equivalent WTA 1000 Clay
Na Li #33 6-4 6-3 Dominika Cibulkova #45 Match data Feb 15, 2008* R16 Antwerp Tier II modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Dominika Cibulkova #315 #4 5,245 1,964 368 265 58.1% 0 0 1 4 3 8
Na Li #9 #2 7,585 2,117 338 159 68.0% 2 1 0 1 5 9

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Dominika Cibulkova Na Li
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2006 2–2 50.0% #153 1,506 0 0
18 2007 17–17 50.0% #51 1,605 0 0 2000 1–3 25.0% #136 1,496 0 0
19 2008 36–26 58.1% #19 1,843 0 0 2001 0–1 0.0% #302 1,480 0 0
20 2009 20–17 54.1% #28 1,735 0 0
21 2010 30–24 55.6% #31 1,753 0 0
22 2011 41–21 66.1% #18 1,894 0 1 2004 6–1 85.7% #78 1,599 0 1
23 2012 34–26 56.7% #15 1,790 0 2 2005 23–14 62.2% #56 1,710 0 1
24 2013 27–23 54.0% #23 1,734 0 3 2006 36–22 62.1% #21 1,818 0 1
25 2014 33–22 60.0% #10 1,719 0 4 2007 22–12 64.7% #29 1,819 0 1
26 2015 19–16 54.3% #38 1,756 0 4 2008 28–14 66.7% #23 1,863 0 2
27 2016 53–21 71.6% #5 1,951 0 8 2009 35–17 67.3% #15 1,938 0 2
28 2017 26–22 54.2% #26 1,778 0 8 2010 36–20 64.3% #11 1,849 0 3
29 2018 28–19 59.6% #25 1,872 0 8 2011 33–17 66.0% #5 1,862 1 5
30 2019 2–9 18.2% #315 1,755 0 8 2012 43–17 71.7% #7 1,999 1 6
31 2013 46–14 76.7% #3 2,067 1 7
32 2014 29–7 80.6% #9 2,024 2 9

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Dominika Cibulkova Na Li
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 2006 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
18 2007 10 12 22 45.5% 7 5 12 58.3% 2000 1 3 4 25.0%
19 2008 27 18 45 60.0% 8 6 14 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2001 0 1 1 0.0%
20 2009 7 10 17 41.2% 11 5 16 68.8% 2 2 4 50.0%
21 2010 18 18 36 50.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 4 2 6 66.7%
22 2011 29 15 44 65.9% 3 3 6 50.0% 7 2 9 77.8% 2 1 3 66.7% 2004 6 1 7 85.7%
23 2012 19 17 36 52.8% 13 6 19 68.4% 2 3 5 40.0% 2005 16 12 28 57.1% 7 2 9 77.8%
24 2013 19 15 34 55.9% 4 5 9 44.4% 4 2 6 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 2006 18 14 32 56.3% 12 4 16 75.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2014 29 17 46 63.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2007 13 5 18 72.2% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 1 3 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0%
26 2015 17 14 31 54.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 2008 26 12 38 68.4% 2 2 4 50.0%
27 2016 37 17 54 68.5% 7 3 10 70.0% 9 1 10 90.0% 2009 22 9 31 71.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 7 3 10 70.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
28 2017 22 15 37 59.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 2010 17 14 31 54.8% 10 4 14 71.4% 9 2 11 81.8%
29 2018 18 11 29 62.1% 5 5 10 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 2011 16 12 28 57.1% 15 3 18 83.3% 2 2 4 50.0%
30 2019 1 5 6 16.7% 1 4 5 20.0% 2012 30 10 40 75.0% 12 4 16 75.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 2013 35 8 43 81.4% 5 4 9 55.6% 6 2 8 75.0%
32 2014 22 3 25 88.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 1 3 66.7%
Career 254 185 439 57.9% 72 53 125 57.6% 39 24 63 61.9% 3 3 6 50.0% 222 104 326 68.1% 77 33 110 70.0% 37 18 55 67.3% 2 4 6 33.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 560/630 of Dominika Cibulkova's and 372/485 of Na Li's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Dominika Cibulkova Na Li
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 2007 23/34 0.3 3.9 62.2% 56.6% 46.2% 51.0% 47.4% 52.3% 45.7% —/—
19 2008 56/62 0.8 2.7 68.4% 60.8% 48.3% 54.4% 46.5% 56.7% 46.6% —/—
20 2009 36/37 0.6 3.3 67.4% 60.0% 49.3% 52.6% 53.6% 56.4% 46.9% —/—
21 2010 50/54 1.1 3.7 63.2% 60.8% 46.2% 53.9% 50.9% 55.6% 43.9% —/—
22 2011 53/62 1.1 4.2 56.1% 64.9% 46.5% 54.6% 53.9% 56.8% 48.0% —/—
23 2012 52/60 1.5 4.2 54.2% 66.3% 45.8% 50.4% 53.3% 56.4% 48.0% 2005 2/37 1.5 3.5 71.4% 54.3% 62.6% 49.2% 41.7% 56.3% 43.6%
24 2013 45/50 0.9 4.8 60.8% 61.9% 44.4% 53.5% 44.6% 55.1% 45.9% 2006 36/58 1.9 2.3 71.1% 61.5% 49.3% 51.6% 50.5% 57.6% 45.2%
25 2014 51/55 0.8 4.3 66.5% 62.6% 45.5% 57.1% 50.5% 57.0% 47.7% 2007 33/34 1.5 2.0 71.5% 62.4% 51.9% 52.6% 45.7% 59.2% 46.2%
26 2015 24/35 1.0 4.1 67.0% 61.0% 48.2% 53.0% 43.9% 56.6% 43.0% 2008 32/42 2.2 3.9 66.3% 63.4% 48.3% 58.5% 51.1% 58.2% 46.8%
27 2016 67/74 1.0 3.2 66.4% 62.7% 47.5% 54.7% 50.3% 57.8% 48.0% 2009 47/52 2.1 2.9 63.9% 65.4% 51.1% 45.7% 50.4% 59.9% 46.1%
28 2017 48/48 0.8 3.0 66.1% 61.9% 48.2% 55.0% 49.4% 57.2% 45.4% 2010 48/56 2.3 2.9 68.5% 65.7% 49.2% 50.4% 51.7% 60.4% 47.3%
29 2018 45/48 1.1 3.9 65.2% 63.3% 48.4% 55.6% 48.6% 58.1% 44.3% 2011 39/50 2.1 3.2 69.1% 64.4% 47.3% 54.6% 51.5% 59.1% 45.2%
30 2019 10/11 0.9 4.5 66.1% 58.8% 45.1% 54.3% 40.4% 54.2% 38.4% 2012 49/60 2.3 3.0 68.7% 65.1% 53.5% 57.5% 51.0% 61.2% 47.8%
31 —/— 2013 52/60 2.8 4.2 63.2% 67.9% 49.4% 58.5% 57.2% 61.0% 49.3%
32 —/— 2014 34/36 1.9 4.0 66.5% 66.3% 49.7% 55.6% 57.2% 60.8% 50.0%
Career 560/634 0.9 3.7 63.5% 62.2% 47.0% 54.0% 49.6% 56.5% 46.2% 372/497 2.2 3.2 67.4% 64.9% 50.1% 53.8% 51.9% 59.9% 47.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Dominika Cibulkova Na Li
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 2006 1506 100.7 40.0% -0.20 2–0 1–1 +0.22
18 2007 1606 123.4 -2.75 +1.36 0.957 49.0% -43 +45 48.7% +0.04 6–4 (60%) 4–6 (40%) +0.03 2000 1497 107.1 +34 14.3% -2.14 0–1 -0.21
19 2008 1844 155.6 +2.09 +2.87 1.075 51.6% -8 -147 59.4% +0.56 10–9 (53%) 8–3 (73%) -3.69 2001 1481 95.3 0.0% -4.00 +0.12
20 2009 1735 137.2 +0.81 +1.93 1.075 51.5% -29 +84 -128 59.0% +0.64 4–6 (40%) 4–4 (50%) +0.20
21 2010 1754 142.7 +0.27 +0.68 0.989 49.8% -26 +62 -79 54.4% +0.28 9–8 (53%) 8–2 (80%) +0.39
22 2011 1894 146.9 +1.53 +4.23 1.113 52.5% -32 -107 -88 61.0% +0.76 15–7 (68%) 9–5 (64%) -1.26 2004 1600 125.7 +18 81.3% +1.81 1–1 2–1 (67%) +0.22
23 2012 1791 146.5 +0.57 +4.09 1.101 52.3% -2 +69 -30 59.1% +0.78 6–11 (35%) 10–4 (71%) +0.95 2005 1711 139.1 -0.18 +0.14 0.999 49.8% -25 -56 61.4% +1.04 8–5 (62%) 4–4 (50%) -0.97
24 2013 1735 139.1 +0.40 +2.51 1.022 50.5% +15 +39 +28 51.7% +0.30 11–7 (61%) 6–7 (46%) +0.89 2006 1819 148.7 +1.65 +1.60 1.068 51.4% -79 -12 -62 61.2% +1.05 9–4 (69%) 7–4 (64%) -2.52
25 2014 1719 152.6 +1.29 +4.23 1.109 52.3% +50 +17 +28 59.8% +0.75 9–9 (50%) 6–7 (46%) -0.25 2007 1820 150.2 +2.75 +2.06 1.133 52.7% +69 -38 -48 62.2% +0.96 7–7 (50%) 3–1 (75%) +0.95
26 2015 1757 143.5 -0.51 +1.77 0.989 49.9% +26 -24 50.6% +0.07 8–5 (62%) 6–4 (60%) -0.11 2008 1864 153.7 +2.74 +2.93 1.119 52.6% +37 -127 60.4% +0.83 12–5 (71%) 4–4 (50%) -1.80
27 2016 1952 148.1 +2.12 +4.65 1.136 52.9% -29 -154 -64 65.1% +0.91 19–10 (66%) 9–6 (60%) -1.07 2009 1938 153.8 +4.35 +2.54 1.150 52.7% +49 -152 -127 64.9% +1.04 10–6 (63%) 8–6 (57%) -2.23
28 2017 1778 142.2 +0.88 +1.87 1.062 51.4% +59 -13 +40 55.3% +0.37 9–11 (45%) 5–5 (50%) +2.63 2010 1850 150.5 +4.51 +3.61 1.195 53.7% -23 -4 +91 64.3% +1.23 9–9 (50%) 6–7 (46%) +0.93
29 2018 1872 145.7 +1.54 +1.61 1.058 51.3% +3 -108 -24 58.3% +0.53 7–7 (50%) 7–5 (58%) -0.82 2011 1862 151.3 +3.52 +2.62 1.106 52.2% -57 +131 +42 62.8% +0.61 8–7 (53%) 9–6 (60%) -0.26
30 2019 1755 115.9 -0.72 -0.79 0.839 46.7% +34 -72 29.6% -1.19 1–4 (20%) 0–1 -0.69 2012 2000 162.2 +5.42 +5.11 1.234 54.2% -1 -5 -158 68.1% +1.30 11–10 (52%) 6–4 (60%) 0.00
31 2013 2067 165.5 +5.56 +6.05 1.265 55.0% +56 -126 -177 72.1% +1.64 8–5 (62%) 7–6 (54%) -2.68
32 2014 2024 155.9 +4.17 +5.37 1.275 55.5% +114 -110 -151 75.0% +1.82 6–4 (60%) 5–5 (50%) +0.97
Career 1964 150.3 +0.94 +2.80 1.063 51.4% 0 -11 -38 57.0% +0.50 116–98 (54%) 83–60 (58%) 107.2 -0.41 2117 160.4 +4.01 +3.66 1.175 53.4% +13 -21 -66 65.1% +1.13 89–64 (58%) 61–48 (56%) 106.5 -1.53

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.