H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Dominika Cibulkova vs Na Li H2H: 0-7

Na Li holds a 7–0 lead over Dominika Cibulkova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Na Li leads 5–0 on hard courts and 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Na Li won the 2014 Miami semifinal 7-5 2-6 6-3.

SVK Age 37 Right-Handed 161 cm / 5'3"
H2H
0 7
7 main draw meetings
CHN Age 44 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 22, 2014* Miami WTA 1000 SF Hard Na Li #2 7-5 2-6 6-3 Dominika Cibulkova #11 Match data
Mar 8, 2014* Indian Wells WTA 1000 QF Hard Na Li #2 6-3 4-6 6-3 Dominika Cibulkova #11 Match data
Jan 27, 2014* Australian Open Grand Slam F Hard Na Li #3 7-6(3) 6-0 Dominika Cibulkova #13 Match data
Aug 5, 2013 Toronto WTA 1000 QF Hard Na Li #5 7-6(1) 6-2 Dominika Cibulkova #20 Match data
May 19, 2012* Rome WTA 1000 QF Clay Na Li #9 6-1 7-6(4) Dominika Cibulkova #17 Match data
May 13, 2010* Madrid WTA 1000 R32 Clay Na Li #13 6-2 3-6 7-5 Dominika Cibulkova #27 Match data
Feb 15, 2008* Antwerp WTA 500 R16 Hard Na Li #33 6-4 6-3 Dominika Cibulkova #45 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Dominika Cibulkova #315 #4 5,245 1,966 365 261 58.3% 0 0 1 5 2 8
Na Li #9 #2 7,585 2,124 334 155 68.3% 2 1 0 2 4 9

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Dominika Cibulkova Na Li
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2006 2–2 50.0% #153 1,506 0 0
18 2007 17–17 50.0% #51 1,605 0 0 2000 1–2 33.3% #136 1,499 0 0
19 2008 34–25 57.6% #19 1,840 0 0 2001 0–1 0.0% #302 1,483 0 0
20 2009 20–17 54.1% #28 1,733 0 0
21 2010 30–24 55.6% #31 1,753 0 0
22 2011 41–21 66.1% #18 1,893 0 1 2004 6–1 85.7% #78 1,601 0 1
23 2012 34–25 57.6% #15 1,810 0 2 2005 23–14 62.2% #56 1,711 0 1
24 2013 27–23 54.0% #23 1,738 0 3 2006 36–22 62.1% #21 1,801 0 1
25 2014 33–22 60.0% #10 1,721 0 4 2007 22–12 64.7% #29 1,814 0 1
26 2015 19–16 54.3% #38 1,757 0 4 2008 24–12 66.7% #23 1,843 0 2
27 2016 53–21 71.6% #5 1,951 0 8 2009 35–17 67.3% #15 1,914 0 2
28 2017 26–22 54.2% #26 1,778 0 8 2010 36–20 64.3% #11 1,844 0 3
29 2018 27–18 60.0% #25 1,865 0 8 2011 33–17 66.0% #5 1,868 1 5
30 2019 2–8 20.0% #315 1,764 0 8 2012 43–16 72.9% #7 2,016 1 6
31 2013 46–14 76.7% #3 2,077 1 7
32 2014 29–7 80.6% #9 2,031 2 9