H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Dominika Cibulkova vs Nadia Petrova H2H: 3-2

Dominika Cibulkova holds a 3–2 lead over Nadia Petrova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Dominika Cibulkova leads 3–1 on hard courts, while Nadia Petrova leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Nadia Petrova won the 2013 Dubai third round 5-7 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Dominika Cibulkova
SVK Age 37 Right-Handed 161 cm / 5'3"
H2H
3 – 2
5 main draw meetings
Nadia Petrova
RUS Age 44 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 21, 2013* Dubai WTA 500 R32 Hard Nadia Petrova #12 5-7 6-3 6-2 Dominika Cibulkova #15 Match data
Jul 21, 2012* San Diego WTA 500 SF Hard Dominika Cibulkova #14 7-6(8) 6-1 Nadia Petrova #21 Match data
Jun 23, 2012* 's Hertogenbosch WTA 250 QF Grass Nadia Petrova #22 6-2 6-0 Dominika Cibulkova #13 Match data
Aug 1, 2008* Montreal WTA 1000 R16 Hard Dominika Cibulkova #31 7-6(2) 6-2 Nadia Petrova #17 Match data
Jul 17, 2008* Stanford WTA 500 R32 Hard Dominika Cibulkova #32 6-4 3-6 6-3 Nadia Petrova #17 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Dominika Cibulkova #315 #4 5,245 1,966 365 261 58.3% 0 0 1 5 2 8
Nadia Petrova #578 #3 3,882 2,077 441 276 61.5% 0 3 1 7 2 13

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Dominika Cibulkova Nadia Petrova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1998 2–2 50.0% #145 1,536 0 0
17 2006 2–2 50.0% #153 1,506 0 0 1999 3–5 37.5% #93 1,568 0 0
18 2007 17–17 50.0% #51 1,605 0 0 2000 12–15 44.4% #60 1,624 0 0
19 2008 34–25 57.6% #19 1,840 0 0 2001 20–21 48.8% #39 1,682 0 0
20 2009 20–17 54.1% #28 1,733 0 0 2002 7–5 58.3% #112 1,758 0 0
21 2010 30–24 55.6% #31 1,753 0 0 2003 36–20 64.3% #12 1,924 0 0
22 2011 41–21 66.1% #18 1,893 0 1 2004 39–24 61.9% #12 1,880 0 0
23 2012 34–25 57.6% #15 1,810 0 2 2005 56–25 69.1% #9 1,945 0 1
24 2013 27–23 54.0% #23 1,738 0 3 2006 48–19 71.6% #6 1,990 0 6
25 2014 33–22 60.0% #10 1,721 0 4 2007 37–18 67.3% #14 1,931 0 7
26 2015 19–16 54.3% #38 1,757 0 4 2008 47–24 66.2% #11 1,923 0 9
27 2016 53–21 71.6% #5 1,951 0 8 2009 30–21 58.8% #20 1,821 0 9
28 2017 26–22 54.2% #26 1,778 0 8 2010 32–20 61.5% #15 1,828 0 9
29 2018 27–18 60.0% #25 1,865 0 8 2011 25–21 54.3% #29 1,781 0 10
30 2019 2–8 20.0% #315 1,764 0 8 2012 37–18 67.3% #12 1,917 0 13
31 — — — — — — — 2013 9–13 40.9% #104 1,718 0 13
32 — — — — — — — 2014 1–5 16.7% #362 1,648 0 13