H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Dominika Cibulkova vs Serena Williams H2H: 0-5

Serena Williams holds a 5–0 lead over Dominika Cibulkova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Serena Williams leads 3–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Serena Williams won the 2015 Australian Open quarterfinal 6-2 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Dominika Cibulkova
SVK Age 37 Right-Handed 161 cm / 5'3"
H2H
0 – 5
5 main draw meetings
Serena Williams
USA Age 44 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 29, 2015* Australian Open Grand Slam QF Hard Serena Williams #1 6-2 6-2 Dominika Cibulkova #10 Match data
Jan 4, 2014* Brisbane WTA 500 QF Hard Serena Williams #1 6-3 6-3 Dominika Cibulkova #23 Match data
May 17, 2013* Rome WTA 1000 R16 Clay Serena Williams #1 6-0 6-1 Dominika Cibulkova #16 Match data
Mar 22, 2013* Miami WTA 1000 R16 Hard Serena Williams #1 2-6 6-4 6-2 Dominika Cibulkova #14 Match data
Jun 26, 2010* Wimbledon Grand Slam R32 Grass Serena Williams #1 6-0 7-5 Dominika Cibulkova #46 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Dominika Cibulkova #315 #4 5,245 1,966 365 261 58.3% 0 0 1 5 2 8
Serena Williams #320 #1 13,615 2,405 825 170 82.9% 23 23 5 17 3 71

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Dominika Cibulkova Serena Williams
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1997 3–2 60.0% #101 1,582 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1998 26–11 70.3% #20 1,895 0 0
17 2006 2–2 50.0% #153 1,506 0 0 1999 37–7 84.1% #4 2,170 1 4
18 2007 17–17 50.0% #51 1,605 0 0 2000 37–8 82.2% #6 2,174 1 7
19 2008 34–25 57.6% #19 1,840 0 0 2001 40–7 85.1% #6 2,259 1 10
20 2009 20–17 54.1% #28 1,733 0 0 2002 57–5 91.9% #1 2,348 4 18
21 2010 30–24 55.6% #31 1,753 0 0 2003 36–3 92.3% #3 2,369 6 22
22 2011 41–21 66.1% #18 1,893 0 1 2004 39–11 78.0% #7 2,192 6 24
23 2012 34–25 57.6% #15 1,810 0 2 2005 21–9 70.0% #11 2,028 7 25
24 2013 27–23 54.0% #23 1,738 0 3 2006 12–4 75.0% #95 2,016 7 25
25 2014 33–22 60.0% #10 1,721 0 4 2007 34–10 77.3% #7 2,058 8 27
26 2015 19–16 54.3% #38 1,757 0 4 2008 41–8 83.7% #2 2,109 9 31
27 2016 53–21 71.6% #5 1,951 0 8 2009 50–13 79.4% #1 2,106 11 34
28 2017 26–22 54.2% #26 1,778 0 8 2010 25–4 86.2% #4 2,149 13 36
29 2018 27–18 60.0% #25 1,865 0 8 2011 22–4 84.6% #12 2,155 13 38
30 2019 2–8 20.0% #315 1,764 0 8 2012 48–6 88.9% #3 2,239 15 44
31 — — — — — — — 2013 77–5 93.9% #1 2,345 17 55
32 — — — — — — — 2014 52–10 83.9% #1 2,209 18 62
33 — — — — — — — 2015 50–6 89.3% #1 2,197 21 67
34 — — — — — — — 2016 36–5 87.8% #2 2,177 22 69
35 — — — — — — — 2017 8–1 88.9% #22 2,172 23 70
36 — — — — — — — 2018 18–7 72.0% #16 2,078 23 70
37 — — — — — — — 2019 25–8 75.8% #10 2,052 23 70
38 — — — — — — — 2020 16–5 76.2% #11 1,991 23 71
39 — — — — — — — 2021 12–6 66.7% #41 1,950 23 71
40 — — — — — — — 2022 3–4 42.9% #320 1,891 23 71
44 — — — — — — — 2026 0–1 0.0% #320 — 23 71