H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Dominika Cibulkova vs Yung Jan Chan H2H: 1-0
Dominika Cibulkova holds a 1–0 lead over Yung Jan Chan in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Dominika Cibulkova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Dominika Cibulkova won the 2009 Australian Open second round 6-0 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SVK
Age 37
Right-Handed
161 cm / 5'3"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 22, 2009* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Dominika Cibulkova | 6-0 6-2 | Yung Jan Chan | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dominika Cibulkova | #315 | #4 | 5,245 | 1,966 | 365 | 261 | 58.3% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 8 |
| Yung Jan Chan | — | — | — | 1,640 | 49 | 83 | 37.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Dominika Cibulkova | Yung Jan Chan | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2006 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #153 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #51 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 3–3 | 50.0% | — | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #19 | 1,840 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 10–16 | 38.5% | — | 1,574 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #28 | 1,733 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 15–19 | 44.1% | — | 1,610 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #31 | 1,753 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 7–12 | 36.8% | — | 1,597 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 41–21 | 66.1% | #18 | 1,893 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 5–13 | 27.8% | — | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #15 | 1,810 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 3–6 | 33.3% | — | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #23 | 1,738 | 0 | 3 | 2012 | 4–4 | 50.0% | — | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #10 | 1,721 | 0 | 4 | 2013 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,582 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #38 | 1,757 | 0 | 4 | 2014 | 1–6 | 14.3% | — | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 53–21 | 71.6% | #5 | 1,951 | 0 | 8 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #26 | 1,778 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 27–18 | 60.0% | #25 | 1,865 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #315 | 1,764 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |