H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Donna Vekic vs Coco Vandeweghe H2H: 2-2

Donna Vekic and Coco Vandeweghe are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Coco Vandeweghe leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Donna Vekic leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Donna Vekic won the 2022 Birmingham first round 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Donna Vekic
Croatia Age 30 Right-Handed 179 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2 – 2
4 main draw meetings
Coco Vandeweghe
USA Age 34 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Donna Vekic #92 6-4 6-4 Coco Vandeweghe #122 Match data Jun 16, 2022* R32 Birmingham WTA 250 Grass
Donna Vekic #40 6-4 3-6 2-1 (ret.) Coco Vandeweghe #50 Match data Sep 25, 2018* R64 Wuhan Open Premier 5 → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Coco Vandeweghe #16 6-2 6-2 Donna Vekic #46 Match data Oct 2, 2017 R64 China Open Premier Mandatory → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Coco Vandeweghe #38 2-6 6-3 6-1 Donna Vekic #79 Match data Aug 27, 2014* R128 US Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Donna Vekic #39 #17 2,458 1,933 243 238 50.5% 0 0 0 1 4 5
Coco Vandeweghe #815 #9 3,258 1,880 138 152 47.6% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Donna Vekic Coco Vandeweghe
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 2006 0–1 0.0% — 1,484 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 2007 0–1 0.0% #549 1,479 0 0
16 2012 4–1 80.0% #108 1,565 0 0 2008 0–3 0.0% #476 1,453 0 0
17 2013 12–12 50.0% #96 1,603 0 0 2009 1–2 33.3% #322 1,465 0 0
18 2014 12–18 40.0% #82 1,552 0 1 2010 6–6 50.0% #116 1,567 0 0
19 2015 10–10 50.0% #103 1,606 0 1 2011 8–13 38.1% #122 1,543 0 0
20 2016 4–16 20.0% #101 1,562 0 1 2012 6–7 46.2% #97 1,605 0 0
21 2017 16–21 43.2% #55 1,670 0 2 2013 5–11 31.2% #113 1,563 0 0
22 2018 31–24 56.4% #34 1,781 0 2 2014 22–14 61.1% #39 1,731 0 1
23 2019 35–24 59.3% #19 1,770 0 2 2015 20–21 48.8% #37 1,726 0 1
24 2020 8–11 42.1% #32 1,695 0 2 2016 22–18 55.0% #36 1,732 0 2
25 2021 16–15 51.6% #68 1,760 0 3 2017 29–18 61.7% #10 1,858 0 2
26 2022 12–13 48.0% #67 1,801 0 3 2018 9–16 36.0% #100 1,690 0 2
27 2023 26–20 56.5% #23 1,778 0 4 2019 1–3 25.0% #241 1,689 0 2
28 2024 31–20 60.8% #19 1,896 0 4 2020 0–2 0.0% #214 1,624 0 2
29 2025 14–21 40.0% #69 1,741 0 4 2021 4–9 30.8% #174 1,591 0 2
30 2026 12–12 50.0% #39 1,759 0 5 2022 4–5 44.4% #128 1,666 0 2
31 — — — — — — — 2023 1–2 33.3% #420 1,533 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Donna Vekic Coco Vandeweghe
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
16 2012 4 1 5 80.0% — — — — — — — — 2008 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 2013 7 9 16 43.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 2009 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
18 2014 11 15 26 42.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2010 6 6 12 50.0% — — — — — — — —
19 2015 7 7 14 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2011 7 9 16 43.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
20 2016 4 10 14 28.6% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2012 6 6 12 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
21 2017 9 16 25 36.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 2013 5 7 12 41.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
22 2018 18 15 33 54.5% 6 5 11 54.5% 7 4 11 63.6% 2014 13 11 24 54.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 8 2 10 80.0%
23 2019 24 18 42 57.1% 7 3 10 70.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2015 10 13 23 43.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 8 4 12 66.7%
24 2020 7 8 15 46.7% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2016 10 13 23 43.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 11 2 13 84.6%
25 2021 12 11 23 52.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2017 19 12 31 61.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 6 3 9 66.7%
26 2022 8 8 16 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 2018 1 9 10 10.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 3 3 6 50.0%
27 2023 15 12 27 55.6% 4 5 9 44.4% 7 3 10 70.0% 2019 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — —
28 2024 12 11 23 52.2% 8 5 13 61.5% 11 4 15 73.3% 2020 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
29 2025 9 13 22 40.9% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 4 6 33.3% 2021 0 5 5 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
30 2026 2 7 9 22.2% 5 3 8 62.5% 5 2 7 71.4% 2022 1 2 3 33.3% 3 1 4 75.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
Career — 149 161 310 48.1% 39 42 81 48.1% 55 35 90 61.1% — 81 107 188 43.1% 16 21 37 43.2% 41 24 65 63.1%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 444/483 of Donna Vekic's and 279/290 of Coco Vandeweghe's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Donna Vekic Coco Vandeweghe
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
14 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 1/1 2.0 2.0 40.4% 69.6% 38.2% 50.0% 100.0% 50.9% 26.1%
15 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 1/1 7.0 7.0 53.2% 75.8% 41.4% 62.5% 16.7% 59.7% 30.9%
16 2012 4/5 4.3 2.3 52.3% 70.6% 53.9% 25.0% 53.1% 62.9% 44.2% 2008 3/3 1.3 2.3 58.0% 53.2% 40.3% 36.1% 50.7% 47.4% 37.5%
17 2013 24/24 2.7 2.8 56.0% 65.9% 50.9% 40.1% 46.9% 58.9% 44.8% 2009 3/3 3.7 0.0 64.6% 54.3% 58.5% 52.3% 36.7% 55.8% 36.4%
18 2014 30/30 3.7 4.4 53.3% 66.6% 40.9% 47.3% 54.0% 54.4% 42.1% 2010 11/12 4.5 5.5 58.9% 63.3% 38.8% 49.9% 47.6% 53.0% 42.0%
19 2015 14/20 3.9 5.6 57.9% 63.2% 43.0% 40.1% 45.4% 54.1% 38.4% 2011 21/21 3.9 5.3 52.3% 64.7% 44.8% 49.5% 41.2% 55.2% 39.7%
20 2016 20/20 2.9 6.3 49.8% 64.6% 39.8% 54.2% 52.4% 52.2% 40.3% 2012 12/13 5.7 5.1 48.8% 74.1% 45.6% 66.1% 63.0% 59.6% 40.2%
21 2017 37/37 3.9 5.3 56.0% 65.0% 45.6% 57.2% 47.8% 56.3% 40.4% 2013 16/16 5.8 4.9 49.7% 68.0% 46.7% 50.2% 43.9% 56.9% 41.9%
22 2018 49/55 3.1 4.7 55.1% 67.5% 44.7% 52.0% 48.1% 57.3% 45.4% 2014 36/36 8.5 4.6 53.3% 76.0% 47.8% 52.7% 45.7% 62.8% 40.3%
23 2019 59/59 3.6 4.3 57.1% 69.9% 47.5% 48.2% 52.0% 60.4% 45.0% 2015 34/41 6.8 3.6 54.9% 70.6% 56.0% 60.3% 42.3% 63.9% 37.0%
24 2020 19/19 2.9 4.4 58.0% 65.5% 43.7% 43.4% 45.6% 56.9% 42.5% 2016 38/40 5.9 3.7 54.7% 72.8% 49.4% 54.0% 45.2% 62.3% 41.9%
25 2021 28/31 4.6 5.5 57.2% 70.4% 45.8% 53.6% 44.5% 59.7% 43.1% 2017 47/47 5.3 4.3 54.7% 74.4% 50.5% 61.6% 43.8% 63.6% 41.3%
26 2022 25/25 3.8 5.3 56.6% 68.9% 45.0% 52.3% 57.0% 58.5% 41.5% 2018 25/25 5.9 5.2 54.5% 69.3% 46.5% 55.0% 43.6% 59.1% 38.2%
27 2023 46/47 4.0 5.4 56.0% 67.6% 44.2% 52.8% 51.8% 57.4% 43.6% 2019 4/4 3.5 5.0 45.4% 65.4% 40.8% 48.8% 24.6% 52.3% 35.4%
28 2024 44/51 4.8 4.8 57.2% 71.9% 45.2% 49.1% 46.5% 60.4% 44.1% 2020 2/2 6.0 7.0 55.9% 70.7% 37.8% 64.6% 22.2% 56.1% 36.7%
29 2025 22/35 3.0 5.8 53.4% 64.6% 39.6% 51.8% 43.1% 53.0% 41.1% 2021 13/13 5.8 4.9 55.2% 66.9% 45.9% 39.1% 44.7% 57.6% 37.4%
30 2026 23/25 3.9 4.6 58.7% 67.5% 44.4% 54.4% 38.9% 58.1% 41.2% 2022 9/9 6.0 4.4 50.7% 69.4% 45.3% 48.0% 40.8% 57.5% 35.7%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2023 3/3 7.3 6.3 49.4% 66.2% 41.4% 41.5% 20.1% 53.6% 32.8%
Career — 444/483 3.7 4.8 55.9% 67.7% 44.8% 50.1% 48.7% 57.6% 43.0% — 279/290 5.9 4.5 53.8% 70.7% 48.2% 54.6% 44.2% 60.2% 39.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Donna Vekic Coco Vandeweghe
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1485 98.4 -1.31 -2.15 0.531 39.8% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.21
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1480 104.6 -2.63 -2.18 0.766 44.6% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.09
16 2012 1565 114.5 +2.21 -1.39 1.193 53.0% +23 — — 72.7% +1.73 1–0 1–0 — +0.32 2008 1453 104.3 +0.09 -1.10 0.713 42.8% +20 — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.14
17 2013 1604 122.4 +1.86 +0.10 1.090 51.8% -25 — +81 50.0% +0.17 3–3 (50%) 4–2 (67%) — -0.09 2009 1466 104.1 +1.17 -2.23 0.824 46.3% +13 — — 33.3% -1.83 — — — -0.10
18 2014 1552 122.1 -1.63 -1.74 0.922 48.4% +17 — +134 44.6% -0.50 5–9 (36%) 6–1 (86%) — -0.23 2010 1567 119.9 -0.34 -0.02 0.895 47.8% +7 — — 45.8% -0.83 1–1 1–1 — +0.28
19 2015 1606 102.7 -2.51 -2.71 0.835 46.2% -21 -76 — 44.7% -0.74 6–1 (86%) — — +0.62 2011 1543 108.2 -1.37 -3.03 0.887 47.8% +26 — +40 34.8% -0.78 4–0 (100%) 1–5 (17%) — +1.49
20 2016 1563 111.8 -2.41 -1.13 0.843 46.5% +44 -99 — 24.4% -1.29 2–3 (40%) 1–4 (20%) — -0.76 2012 1605 131.1 +3.23 -0.27 0.996 49.9% +24 — — 48.3% -0.10 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — -0.31
21 2017 1670 128.8 -0.07 -1.45 0.923 48.5% -42 -177 +56 45.8% -0.31 3–6 (33%) 5–8 (38%) — -0.63 2013 1563 120.9 +0.40 -1.77 0.973 49.4% +55 — — 37.8% -0.43 1–4 (20%) 2–4 (33%) — +0.12
22 2018 1782 137.0 +0.35 +2.36 1.063 51.2% -52 -181 -7 57.0% +0.37 4–11 (27%) 6–6 (50%) — +0.05 2014 1731 138.8 +5.61 -2.20 1.082 51.2% -19 — -18 55.7% +0.23 7–4 (64%) 7–6 (54%) — -0.26
23 2019 1771 150.5 +3.02 +2.45 1.137 52.4% -24 -62 +25 60.0% +0.92 8–11 (42%) 4–14 (22%) — +1.18 2015 1726 124.1 +4.83 -2.53 1.026 50.3% -38 -235 +47 51.1% -0.08 8–6 (57%) 10–3 (77%) — -1.43
24 2020 1696 131.1 +0.33 0.00 0.985 49.4% +28 -43 — 40.5% -0.26 3–1 (75%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.62 2016 1733 136.0 +5.07 -0.74 1.111 51.7% -68 -242 +155 56.2% +0.31 5–6 (45%) 5–4 (56%) — -0.72
25 2021 1761 140.5 +1.94 +0.45 1.069 51.4% +17 — +73 52.1% +0.42 5–6 (45%) 4–7 (36%) — -0.11 2017 1859 148.2 +6.32 -0.53 1.133 51.9% -29 -280 +61 60.0% +0.45 6–6 (50%) 11–2 (85%) — -1.00
26 2022 1802 135.2 +1.22 +0.17 0.999 50.4% +25 — +9 50.0% +0.02 2–4 (33%) 3–3 (50%) — -0.92 2018 1691 124.0 +2.04 -2.71 0.932 48.6% -31 -30 +160 43.4% -0.55 2–5 (29%) 6–5 (55%) — -0.76
27 2023 1779 141.0 +1.13 +0.49 1.024 50.6% +3 -119 +117 53.8% +0.22 11–7 (61%) 11–9 (55%) — -0.44 2019 1690 112.5 -0.39 -0.74 0.742 44.1% -7 — — 25.0% -1.63 — 0–1 — -0.01
28 2024 1896 146.2 +3.22 +1.18 1.113 51.8% -95 -87 +112 57.0% +0.69 12–11 (52%) 6–10 (38%) — -0.31 2020 1624 102.4 -0.35 -1.49 0.835 46.5% — — — 20.0% -1.80 0–1 — — -0.12
29 2025 1741 135.8 -2.37 -0.97 0.874 47.3% +7 +22 +152 41.3% -0.52 5–5 (50%) 2–7 (22%) — +1.04 2021 1591 99.2 -0.08 -3.74 0.881 47.2% -64 — +332 34.5% -1.10 1–2 (33%) 2–3 (40%) — +0.17
30 2026 1760 136.0 +1.23 -0.64 0.982 49.6% -63 +65 +173 50.9% -0.05 4–7 (36%) 5–2 (71%) — +0.13 2022 1667 108.1 +0.32 -2.42 0.840 46.3% -63 +2 — 36.4% -0.96 4–0 (100%) 0–1 — +0.03
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1534 102.7 -1.75 -2.65 0.707 43.4% -15 — — 28.6% -1.72 1–0 1–1 — -0.10
Career — 1933 141.0 +0.84 +0.33 1.013 50.2% -15 -77 +80 50.6% +0.11 74–85 (47%) 59–75 (44%) 94.6 +0.10 — 1880 132.9 +3.27 -1.72 0.995 49.7% -17 -153 +106 47.8% -0.23 41–37 (53%) 46–37 (55%) 106.9 -0.94

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.