H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Donna Vekic vs Julia Goerges H2H: 1-3
Julia Goerges holds a 3–1 lead over Donna Vekic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Julia Goerges leads 2–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Donna Vekic won the 2019 US Open fourth round 6-7(5) 7-5 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CRO
Age 30
Right-Handed
179 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
3
4 main draw meetings
GER
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 3, 2019* | US Open | Grand Slam | R16 | Hard | Donna Vekic | 6-7(5) 7-5 6-3 | Julia Goerges | Match data |
| Oct 19, 2018* | Luxembourg | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Julia Goerges | 6-3 3-6 6-3 | Donna Vekic | Match data |
| Jul 10, 2018* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R16 | Grass | Julia Goerges | 6-3 6-2 | Donna Vekic | Match data |
| Feb 24, 2017* | Budapest | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Julia Goerges | 6-2 6-2 | Donna Vekic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Donna Vekic | #35 | #17 | 2,458 | 1,908 | 230 | 232 | 49.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
| Julia Goerges | #45 | #9 | 3,980 | 1,940 | 304 | 249 | 55.0% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Donna Vekic | Julia Goerges | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2012 | 4–1 | 80.0% | #108 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #126 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #96 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #108 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #82 | 1,550 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #77 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #103 | 1,606 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 29–22 | 56.9% | #40 | 1,760 | 0 | 1 |
| 2016 | 4–16 | 20.0% | #101 | 1,563 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 36–24 | 60.0% | #21 | 1,772 | 0 | 2 |
| 2017 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #55 | 1,669 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #18 | 1,751 | 0 | 2 |
| 2018 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #34 | 1,761 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 14–27 | 34.1% | #72 | 1,535 | 0 | 2 |
| 2019 | 35–24 | 59.3% | #19 | 1,767 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #74 | 1,596 | 0 | 2 |
| 2020 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #32 | 1,693 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #50 | 1,612 | 0 | 2 |
| 2021 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #68 | 1,745 | 0 | 3 | 2016 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #53 | 1,671 | 0 | 2 |
| 2022 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #67 | 1,799 | 0 | 3 | 2017 | 42–22 | 65.6% | #14 | 1,880 | 0 | 4 |
| 2023 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #23 | 1,776 | 0 | 4 | 2018 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #14 | 1,861 | 0 | 6 |
| 2024 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #19 | 1,862 | 0 | 4 | 2019 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #28 | 1,799 | 0 | 7 |
| 2025 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #69 | 1,734 | 0 | 4 | 2020 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #45 | 1,761 | 0 | 7 |
| 2026 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #35 | 1,795 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |