H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 22:33 UTC
Donna Vekic vs Katie Boulter H2H: 1-1
Donna Vekic and Katie Boulter are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Donna Vekic leads 1–0 on grass, while Katie Boulter leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Donna Vekic won the 2026 Queens semifinal 6-1 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CRO
Age 30
Right-Handed
179 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
GBR
Age 29
Right-Handed
182 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 13, 2026 | Queens | WTA 500 | SF | Grass | Donna Vekic | 6-1 6-3 | Katie Boulter | Match data |
| Mar 2, 2024* | San Diego | WTA 500 | QF | Hard | Katie Boulter | 6-4 6-3 | Donna Vekic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Donna Vekic | #35 | #17 | 2,458 | 1,908 | 230 | 232 | 49.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
| Katie Boulter | #67 | #23 | 1,931 | 1,861 | 93 | 90 | 50.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Donna Vekic | Katie Boulter | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2012 | 4–1 | 80.0% | #108 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2013 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #96 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2014 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #82 | 1,550 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2015 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #103 | 1,606 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2016 | 4–16 | 20.0% | #101 | 1,563 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #198 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2017 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #55 | 1,669 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #97 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2018 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #34 | 1,761 | 0 | 2 | 2019 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #319 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2019 | 35–24 | 59.3% | #19 | 1,767 | 0 | 2 | 2020 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #365 | 1,610 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2020 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #32 | 1,693 | 0 | 2 | 2021 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #149 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2021 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #68 | 1,745 | 0 | 3 | 2022 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #136 | 1,738 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2022 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #67 | 1,799 | 0 | 3 | 2023 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #56 | 1,738 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2023 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #23 | 1,776 | 0 | 4 | 2024 | 29–19 | 60.4% | #24 | 1,833 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2024 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #19 | 1,862 | 0 | 4 | 2025 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #106 | 1,753 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2025 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #69 | 1,734 | 0 | 4 | 2026 | 17–12 | 58.6% | #67 | 1,793 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 2026 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #35 | 1,795 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |