H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC
Donna Vekic vs Magdalena Rybarikova H2H: 3-0
Donna Vekic holds a 3–0 lead over Magdalena Rybarikova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Donna Vekic leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Donna Vekic won the 2019 Brisbane third round 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CRO
Age 30
Right-Handed
179 cm / 5'10"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
SVK
Age 37
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 31, 2018 | Brisbane | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Donna Vekic | 6-1 6-2 | Magdalena Rybarikova | Match data |
| Jan 7, 2016 | Sydney | WTA 500 | Q1 | Hard | Magdalena Rybarikova | 6-2 6-0 | Donna Vekic | Match data |
| Jun 15, 2013* | Birmingham | WTA 250 | SF | Grass | Donna Vekic | 7-6(5) 1-6 6-3 | Magdalena Rybarikova | Match data |
| Sep 13, 2012* | Tashkent | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Donna Vekic | 7-6(3) 6-3 | Magdalena Rybarikova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Donna Vekic | #35 | #17 | 2,458 | 1,908 | 230 | 232 | 49.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
| Magdalena Rybarikova | #199 | #17 | 2,405 | 1,817 | 188 | 207 | 47.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Donna Vekic | Magdalena Rybarikova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2012 | 4–1 | 80.0% | #108 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2013 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #96 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #342 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2014 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #82 | 1,550 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #231 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2015 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #103 | 1,606 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2016 | 4–16 | 20.0% | #101 | 1,563 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 27–26 | 50.9% | #44 | 1,694 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2017 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #55 | 1,669 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #106 | 1,582 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2018 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #34 | 1,761 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #71 | 1,607 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2019 | 35–24 | 59.3% | #19 | 1,767 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #62 | 1,605 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2020 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #32 | 1,693 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 29–22 | 56.9% | #37 | 1,739 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 2021 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #68 | 1,745 | 0 | 3 | 2014 | 20–26 | 43.5% | #50 | 1,691 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 2022 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #67 | 1,799 | 0 | 3 | 2015 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #80 | 1,610 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 2023 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #23 | 1,776 | 0 | 4 | 2016 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #154 | 1,665 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 2024 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #19 | 1,862 | 0 | 4 | 2017 | 19–11 | 63.3% | #20 | 1,794 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 2025 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #69 | 1,734 | 0 | 4 | 2018 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #48 | 1,677 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 2026 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #35 | 1,795 | 0 | 5 | 2019 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #176 | 1,608 | 0 | 4 |