H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Donna Vekic vs Natalia Vikhlyantseva H2H: 1-1
Donna Vekic and Natalia Vikhlyantseva are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Donna Vekic leads 1–0 on grass, while Natalia Vikhlyantseva leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Natalia Vikhlyantseva won the 2017 Cincinnati second round 6-3 2-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CRO
Age 30
Right-Handed
179 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 29
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 16, 2017* | Cincinnati | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Natalia Vikhlyantseva | 6-3 2-6 6-3 | Donna Vekic | Match data |
| Jul 5, 2017* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Donna Vekic | 6-7(6) 6-4 6-1 | Natalia Vikhlyantseva | Match data |
| May 5, 2017 | Madrid | WTA 1000 | Q1 | Clay | Donna Vekic | 6-2 3-0 (ret.) | Natalia Vikhlyantseva | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Donna Vekic | #35 | #17 | 2,458 | 1,908 | 230 | 232 | 49.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
| Natalia Vikhlyantseva | #1,034 | #54 | 1,070 | 1,693 | 34 | 56 | 37.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Donna Vekic | Natalia Vikhlyantseva | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2012 | 4–1 | 80.0% | #108 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2013 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #96 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2014 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #82 | 1,550 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #237 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2015 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #103 | 1,606 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #132 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2016 | 4–16 | 20.0% | #101 | 1,563 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #56 | 1,652 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2017 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #55 | 1,669 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 5–17 | 22.7% | #134 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2018 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #34 | 1,761 | 0 | 2 | 2019 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #115 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2019 | 35–24 | 59.3% | #19 | 1,767 | 0 | 2 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #145 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2020 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #32 | 1,693 | 0 | 2 | 2021 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #195 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2021 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #68 | 1,745 | 0 | 3 | 2022 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #382 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2022 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #67 | 1,799 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2023 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #23 | 1,776 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2024 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #19 | 1,862 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2025 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #69 | 1,734 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2026 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #35 | 1,795 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |