H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 22:32 UTC
Donna Vekic vs Olga Govortsova H2H: 0-1
Olga Govortsova holds a 1–0 lead over Donna Vekic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Olga Govortsova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Olga Govortsova won the 2013 Tashkent fourth round 7-6(4) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CRO
Age 30
Right-Handed
179 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
BLR
Age 37
Right-Handed
182 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 13, 2013* | Tashkent | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Olga Govortsova | 7-6(4) 6-3 | Donna Vekic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Donna Vekic | #35 | #17 | 2,458 | 1,908 | 230 | 232 | 49.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
| Olga Govortsova | #1,276 | #35 | 1,510 | 1,705 | 123 | 186 | 39.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Donna Vekic | Olga Govortsova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2012 | 4–1 | 80.0% | #108 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2013 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #96 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #337 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2014 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #82 | 1,550 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #48 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2015 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #103 | 1,606 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #47 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2016 | 4–16 | 20.0% | #101 | 1,563 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #50 | 1,693 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2017 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #55 | 1,669 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 13–27 | 32.5% | #75 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2018 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #34 | 1,761 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 6–19 | 24.0% | #111 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2019 | 35–24 | 59.3% | #19 | 1,767 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #57 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2020 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #32 | 1,693 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #93 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2021 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #68 | 1,745 | 0 | 3 | 2014 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #149 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2022 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #67 | 1,799 | 0 | 3 | 2015 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #71 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2023 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #23 | 1,776 | 0 | 4 | 2016 | 2–11 | 15.4% | #170 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2024 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #19 | 1,862 | 0 | 4 | 2017 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #320 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2025 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #69 | 1,734 | 0 | 4 | 2018 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #393 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2026 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #35 | 1,795 | 0 | 5 | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #192 | 1,451 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #134 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #139 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |