H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC
Donna Vekic vs Yafan Wang H2H: 1-1
Donna Vekic and Yafan Wang are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Donna Vekic won the 2021 Australian Open first round 4-6 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CRO
Age 30
Right-Handed
179 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
CHN
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 10, 2021* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Donna Vekic | 4-6 6-3 6-4 | Yafan Wang | Match data |
| Mar 1, 2019 | Acapulco | WTA 250 | SF | Hard | Yafan Wang | 2-6 6-3 6-1 | Donna Vekic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Donna Vekic | #35 | #17 | 2,458 | 1,908 | 230 | 232 | 49.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
| Yafan Wang | #358 | #47 | 1,185 | 1,784 | 71 | 89 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Donna Vekic | Yafan Wang | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2012 | 4–1 | 80.0% | #108 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #180 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #96 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #136 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #82 | 1,550 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #116 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #103 | 1,606 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #170 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 4–16 | 20.0% | #101 | 1,563 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #70 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #55 | 1,669 | 0 | 2 | 2019 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #48 | 1,718 | 0 | 1 |
| 2018 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #34 | 1,761 | 0 | 2 | 2020 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #95 | 1,664 | 0 | 1 |
| 2019 | 35–24 | 59.3% | #19 | 1,767 | 0 | 2 | 2021 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #309 | 1,495 | 0 | 1 |
| 2020 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #32 | 1,693 | 0 | 2 | 2023 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #100 | 1,627 | 0 | 1 |
| 2021 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #68 | 1,745 | 0 | 3 | 2024 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #61 | 1,719 | 0 | 1 |
| 2022 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #67 | 1,799 | 0 | 3 | 2025 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #279 | 1,697 | 0 | 1 |
| 2023 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #23 | 1,776 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #19 | 1,862 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #69 | 1,734 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #35 | 1,795 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |