H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:32 UTC
Donna Vekic vs Yung Jan Chan H2H: 1-0
Donna Vekic holds a 1–0 lead over Yung Jan Chan in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Donna Vekic leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Donna Vekic won the 2014 Kuala Lumpur third round 3-6 6-4 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 17, 2014* | Kuala Lumpur | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Donna Vekic | 3-6 6-4 6-1 | Yung Jan Chan | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Donna Vekic | #35 | #17 | 2,458 | 1,908 | 230 | 232 | 49.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
| Yung Jan Chan | — | — | — | 1,640 | 49 | 83 | 37.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Donna Vekic | Yung Jan Chan | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2012 | 4–1 | 80.0% | #108 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #96 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 3–3 | 50.0% | — | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #82 | 1,550 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 10–16 | 38.5% | — | 1,574 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #103 | 1,606 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 15–19 | 44.1% | — | 1,610 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 4–16 | 20.0% | #101 | 1,563 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 7–12 | 36.8% | — | 1,597 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #55 | 1,669 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 5–13 | 27.8% | — | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #34 | 1,761 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 3–6 | 33.3% | — | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 35–24 | 59.3% | #19 | 1,767 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 4–4 | 50.0% | — | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 2020 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #32 | 1,693 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,582 | 0 | 0 |
| 2021 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #68 | 1,745 | 0 | 3 | 2014 | 1–6 | 14.3% | — | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 2022 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #67 | 1,799 | 0 | 3 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 2023 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #23 | 1,776 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #19 | 1,862 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #69 | 1,734 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #35 | 1,795 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |