H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 22:32 UTC
Ekaterina Alexandrova vs Ana Ivanovic H2H: 1-0
Ekaterina Alexandrova holds a 1–0 lead over Ana Ivanovic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Ekaterina Alexandrova leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Ekaterina Alexandrova won the 2016 Wimbledon first round 6-2 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 31
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
SRB
Age 38
Right-Handed
184 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 29, 2016* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Ekaterina Alexandrova | 6-2 7-5 | Ana Ivanovic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ekaterina Alexandrova | #19 | #10 | 3,375 | 1,985 | 248 | 189 | 56.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 6 |
| Ana Ivanovic | #63 | #1 | 6,912 | 2,095 | 419 | 213 | 66.3% | 1 | 3 | 2 | 7 | 2 | 15 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ekaterina Alexandrova | Ana Ivanovic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #101 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 32–14 | 69.6% | #16 | 1,847 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 36–18 | 66.7% | #14 | 1,900 | 0 | 2 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 49–17 | 74.2% | #4 | 2,034 | 0 | 5 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 38–16 | 70.4% | #5 | 1,975 | 1 | 8 |
| 21 | 2016 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #109 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 22–14 | 61.1% | #21 | 1,825 | 1 | 8 |
| 22 | 2017 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #95 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 33–18 | 64.7% | #17 | 1,938 | 1 | 10 |
| 23 | 2018 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #73 | 1,677 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 32–20 | 61.5% | #22 | 1,877 | 1 | 11 |
| 24 | 2019 | 35–23 | 60.3% | #35 | 1,830 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 33–18 | 64.7% | #13 | 1,872 | 1 | 11 |
| 25 | 2020 | 19–12 | 61.3% | #33 | 1,818 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 38–23 | 62.3% | #16 | 1,855 | 1 | 11 |
| 26 | 2021 | 25–20 | 55.6% | #34 | 1,805 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 59–18 | 76.6% | #5 | 2,019 | 1 | 15 |
| 27 | 2022 | 33–18 | 64.7% | #19 | 1,905 | 0 | 4 | 2015 | 29–19 | 60.4% | #16 | 1,857 | 1 | 15 |
| 28 | 2023 | 34–22 | 60.7% | #21 | 1,875 | 0 | 5 | 2016 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #63 | 1,702 | 1 | 15 |
| 29 | 2024 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #28 | 1,780 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2025 | 47–25 | 65.3% | #10 | 1,949 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2026 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #19 | 1,813 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |