H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 22:32 UTC
Ekaterina Alexandrova vs Ekaterina Makarova H2H: 0-1
Ekaterina Makarova holds a 1–0 lead over Ekaterina Alexandrova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Ekaterina Makarova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Ekaterina Makarova won the 2017 Australian Open first round 6-0 4-6 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 31
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 38
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 18, 2017* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Ekaterina Makarova | 6-0 4-6 6-1 | Ekaterina Alexandrova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ekaterina Alexandrova | #19 | #10 | 3,375 | 1,985 | 248 | 189 | 56.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 6 |
| Ekaterina Makarova | #1,000 | #8 | 3,620 | 1,940 | 248 | 222 | 52.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ekaterina Alexandrova | Ekaterina Makarova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #110 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #46 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2016 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #109 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #60 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2017 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #95 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #49 | 1,662 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2018 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #73 | 1,677 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #53 | 1,604 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2019 | 35–23 | 60.3% | #35 | 1,830 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #20 | 1,757 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2020 | 19–12 | 61.3% | #33 | 1,818 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #24 | 1,838 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2021 | 25–20 | 55.6% | #34 | 1,805 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 39–21 | 65.0% | #11 | 1,837 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2022 | 33–18 | 64.7% | #19 | 1,905 | 0 | 4 | 2015 | 26–16 | 61.9% | #23 | 1,784 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2023 | 34–22 | 60.7% | #21 | 1,875 | 0 | 5 | 2016 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #30 | 1,782 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2024 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #28 | 1,780 | 0 | 5 | 2017 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #33 | 1,836 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2025 | 47–25 | 65.3% | #10 | 1,949 | 0 | 6 | 2018 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #57 | 1,750 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 2026 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #19 | 1,813 | 0 | 6 | 2019 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #997 | 1,700 | 0 | 3 |