H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Ekaterina Alexandrova vs Elitsa Kostova H2H: 0-1
Elitsa Kostova holds a 1–0 lead over Ekaterina Alexandrova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Elitsa Kostova leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Elitsa Kostova won the 2016 Bol third round 6-1 7-6(4).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 31
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
BUL
Age 36
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 29, 2017 | St. Petersburg | WTA 500 | Q2 | Hard | Elitsa Kostova | 7-5 6-1 | Ekaterina Alexandrova | Match data |
| Jun 2, 2016* | Bol | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Elitsa Kostova | 6-1 7-6(4) | Ekaterina Alexandrova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ekaterina Alexandrova | #19 | #10 | 3,375 | 1,985 | 248 | 189 | 56.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 6 |
| Elitsa Kostova | #1,063 | #130 | 456 | 1,548 | 8 | 18 | 30.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ekaterina Alexandrova | Elitsa Kostova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | 2016 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #109 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2017 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #95 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #252 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2018 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #73 | 1,677 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2019 | 35–23 | 60.3% | #35 | 1,830 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #208 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2020 | 19–12 | 61.3% | #33 | 1,818 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #247 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2021 | 25–20 | 55.6% | #34 | 1,805 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #136 | 1,452 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2022 | 33–18 | 64.7% | #19 | 1,905 | 0 | 4 | 2017 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #201 | 1,447 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2023 | 34–22 | 60.7% | #21 | 1,875 | 0 | 5 | 2018 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #214 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2024 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #28 | 1,780 | 0 | 5 | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #199 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2025 | 47–25 | 65.3% | #10 | 1,949 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2026 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #19 | 1,813 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |