H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:32 UTC
Ekaterina Alexandrova vs Kim Clijsters H2H: 1-0
Ekaterina Alexandrova holds a 1–0 lead over Kim Clijsters in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Ekaterina Alexandrova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Ekaterina Alexandrova won the 2020 US Open first round 3-6 7-5 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 31
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
BEL
Age 43
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 2, 2020* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Ekaterina Alexandrova | 3-6 7-5 6-1 | Kim Clijsters | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ekaterina Alexandrova | #19 | #10 | 3,375 | 1,985 | 248 | 189 | 56.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 6 |
| Kim Clijsters | #1,140 | #1 | 8,895 | 2,275 | 463 | 127 | 78.5% | 4 | 7 | 3 | 21 | 6 | 41 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ekaterina Alexandrova | Kim Clijsters | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 16–7 | 69.6% | #46 | 1,724 | 0 | 1 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 28–15 | 65.1% | #18 | 1,911 | 0 | 3 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 54–19 | 74.0% | #5 | 2,030 | 0 | 6 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 50–17 | 74.6% | #4 | 2,143 | 0 | 10 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 86–12 | 87.8% | #2 | 2,260 | 0 | 19 |
| 21 | 2016 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #109 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 18–4 | 81.8% | #22 | 2,188 | 0 | 21 |
| 22 | 2017 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #95 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 66–9 | 88.0% | #2 | 2,215 | 1 | 30 |
| 23 | 2018 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #73 | 1,677 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 41–12 | 77.4% | #5 | 2,147 | 1 | 33 |
| 24 | 2019 | 35–23 | 60.3% | #35 | 1,830 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 14–4 | 77.8% | #5 | 2,113 | 1 | 34 |
| 25 | 2020 | 19–12 | 61.3% | #33 | 1,818 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2021 | 25–20 | 55.6% | #34 | 1,805 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 13–3 | 81.2% | #18 | 2,128 | 2 | 35 |
| 27 | 2022 | 33–18 | 64.7% | #19 | 1,905 | 0 | 4 | 2010 | 39–7 | 84.8% | #3 | 2,182 | 3 | 40 |
| 28 | 2023 | 34–22 | 60.7% | #21 | 1,875 | 0 | 5 | 2011 | 21–7 | 75.0% | #13 | 2,049 | 4 | 41 |
| 29 | 2024 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #28 | 1,780 | 0 | 5 | 2012 | 17–6 | 73.9% | #20 | 1,989 | 4 | 41 |
| 30 | 2025 | 47–25 | 65.3% | #10 | 1,949 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2026 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #19 | 1,813 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #1030 | 1,927 | 4 | 41 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #1154 | 1,881 | 4 | 41 |