H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:32 UTC
Ekaterina Alexandrova vs Sachia Vickery H2H: 1-0
Ekaterina Alexandrova holds a 1–0 lead over Sachia Vickery in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Ekaterina Alexandrova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Ekaterina Alexandrova won the 2017 Toronto second round 6-1 7-6(3).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 31
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 31
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 9, 2017* | Toronto | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Ekaterina Alexandrova | 6-1 7-6(3) | Sachia Vickery | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ekaterina Alexandrova | #19 | #10 | 3,375 | 1,985 | 248 | 189 | 56.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 6 |
| Sachia Vickery | #417 | #73 | 833 | 1,699 | 38 | 56 | 40.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ekaterina Alexandrova | Sachia Vickery | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #199 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #189 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #129 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2016 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #109 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #138 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2017 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #95 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #120 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2018 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #73 | 1,677 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #101 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2019 | 35–23 | 60.3% | #35 | 1,830 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #157 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2020 | 19–12 | 61.3% | #33 | 1,818 | 0 | 2 | 2020 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #158 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2021 | 25–20 | 55.6% | #34 | 1,805 | 0 | 2 | 2021 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #221 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2022 | 33–18 | 64.7% | #19 | 1,905 | 0 | 4 | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #184 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2023 | 34–22 | 60.7% | #21 | 1,875 | 0 | 5 | 2023 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #146 | 1,571 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2024 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #28 | 1,780 | 0 | 5 | 2024 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #201 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2025 | 47–25 | 65.3% | #10 | 1,949 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2026 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #19 | 1,813 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |