H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Ekaterina Makarova vs Agnieszka Radwanska H2H: 3-5

Agnieszka Radwanska holds a 5–3 lead over Ekaterina Makarova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Agnieszka Radwanska leads 5–1 on hard courts, while Ekaterina Makarova leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Ekaterina Makarova won the 2017 Stuttgart third round 6-2 6-4.

RUS Age 38 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
3 5
8 main draw meetings
POL Age 37 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 27, 2017* Stuttgart WTA 500 R32 Clay Ekaterina Makarova #43 6-2 6-4 Agnieszka Radwanska #8 Match data
Sep 28, 2016* Wuhan WTA 1000 R32 Hard Agnieszka Radwanska #4 6-4 6-1 Ekaterina Makarova #37 Match data
Aug 9, 2014* Montreal WTA 1000 SF Hard Agnieszka Radwanska #5 7-6(1) 7-6(3) Ekaterina Makarova #19 Match data
Jul 2, 2014* Wimbledon Grand Slam R16 Grass Ekaterina Makarova #22 6-3 6-0 Agnieszka Radwanska #4 Match data
Sep 3, 2013* US Open Grand Slam R16 Hard Ekaterina Makarova #25 6-4 6-4 Agnieszka Radwanska #4 Match data
Aug 25, 2011* New Haven WTA 500 R32 Hard Agnieszka Radwanska #13 6-1 6-2 Ekaterina Makarova #42 Match data
Mar 24, 2010* Miami WTA 1000 R64 Hard Agnieszka Radwanska #9 7-5 6-0 Ekaterina Makarova #60 Match data
Sep 30, 2009* Tokyo WTA 1000 R64 Hard Agnieszka Radwanska #12 7-5 6-3 Ekaterina Makarova #54 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Ekaterina Makarova #1,000 #8 3,620 1,940 248 222 52.8% 0 0 0 2 1 3
Agnieszka Radwanska #74 #2 8,530 2,081 506 237 68.1% 0 5 1 8 6 20

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Ekaterina Makarova Agnieszka Radwanska
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2006 11–8 57.9% #61 1,673 0 0
18 2007 27–19 58.7% #26 1,808 0 1
19 2007 2–2 50.0% #110 1,536 0 0 2008 51–19 72.9% #10 1,926 0 4
20 2008 17–20 45.9% #46 1,626 0 0 2009 44–23 65.7% #10 1,910 0 4
21 2009 19–22 46.3% #60 1,634 0 0 2010 32–18 64.0% #14 1,860 0 4
22 2010 14–20 41.2% #49 1,662 0 1 2011 46–18 71.9% #8 1,979 0 7
23 2011 15–23 39.5% #53 1,604 0 1 2012 59–19 75.6% #4 1,994 0 10
24 2012 26–19 57.8% #20 1,757 0 1 2013 56–20 73.7% #5 1,957 0 13
25 2013 24–18 57.1% #24 1,838 0 1 2014 43–22 66.2% #6 1,872 0 14
26 2014 39–21 65.0% #11 1,837 0 2 2015 50–22 69.4% #5 1,957 0 17
27 2015 26–16 61.9% #23 1,784 0 2 2016 51–18 73.9% #3 1,942 0 20
28 2016 23–18 56.1% #30 1,782 0 2 2017 25–18 58.1% #28 1,812 0 20
29 2017 27–21 56.2% #33 1,836 0 3 2018 11–13 45.8% #74 1,727 0 20
30 2018 16–19 45.7% #57 1,750 0 3
31 2019 0–3 0.0% #997 1,700 0 3