H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Ekaterina Makarova vs Alisa Kleybanova H2H: 3-1
Ekaterina Makarova holds a 3–1 lead over Alisa Kleybanova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Ekaterina Makarova leads 2–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Ekaterina Makarova won the 2014 Dubai third round 6-4 6-7(3) 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 38
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 37
Right-Handed
181 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 20, 2014* | Dubai | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Ekaterina Makarova | 6-4 6-7(3) 6-4 | Alisa Kleybanova | Match data |
| Mar 23, 2011* | Miami | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Ekaterina Makarova | 7-5 6-3 | Alisa Kleybanova | Match data |
| Sep 25, 2010* | Seoul | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Alisa Kleybanova | 6-1 6-2 | Ekaterina Makarova | Match data |
| May 2, 2009* | Fes | WTA 250 | SF | Clay | Ekaterina Makarova | 6-2 6-1 | Alisa Kleybanova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ekaterina Makarova | #1,000 | #8 | 3,620 | 1,940 | 248 | 222 | 52.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
| Alisa Kleybanova | #784 | #20 | 2,485 | 1,875 | 108 | 92 | 54.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ekaterina Makarova | Alisa Kleybanova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #368 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #237 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #240 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #32 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2007 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #110 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 31–24 | 56.4% | #29 | 1,776 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2008 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #46 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #25 | 1,825 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 2009 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #60 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #68 | 1,778 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 2010 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #49 | 1,662 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #545 | 1,774 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2011 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #53 | 1,604 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #188 | 1,769 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2012 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #20 | 1,757 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #139 | 1,766 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2013 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #24 | 1,838 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2014 | 39–21 | 65.0% | #11 | 1,837 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2015 | 26–16 | 61.9% | #23 | 1,784 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2016 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #30 | 1,782 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2017 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #33 | 1,836 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2018 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #57 | 1,750 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2019 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #997 | 1,700 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |