H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Ekaterina Makarova vs Anna Tatishvili H2H: 2-0
Ekaterina Makarova holds a 2–0 lead over Anna Tatishvili in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Ekaterina Makarova leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Ekaterina Makarova won the 2015 Toronto second round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 38
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 36
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 12, 2015* | Toronto | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Ekaterina Makarova | 6-3 6-3 | Anna Tatishvili | Match data |
| Aug 16, 2012* | Cincinnati | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Ekaterina Makarova | 6-1 6-2 | Anna Tatishvili | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ekaterina Makarova | #1,000 | #8 | 3,620 | 1,940 | 248 | 222 | 52.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
| Anna Tatishvili | #1,071 | #50 | 1,210 | 1,608 | 43 | 92 | 31.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ekaterina Makarova | Anna Tatishvili | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1156 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #302 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #285 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #160 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2007 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #110 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #177 | 1,423 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2008 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #46 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #134 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2009 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #60 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #89 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2010 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #49 | 1,662 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #51 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2011 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #53 | 1,604 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 4–18 | 18.2% | #127 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2012 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #20 | 1,757 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #146 | 1,436 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2013 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #24 | 1,838 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #101 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2014 | 39–21 | 65.0% | #11 | 1,837 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #200 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2015 | 26–16 | 61.9% | #23 | 1,784 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #516 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2016 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #30 | 1,782 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2017 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #33 | 1,836 | 0 | 3 | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #998 | 1,435 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2018 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #57 | 1,750 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2019 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #997 | 1,700 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |