H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Ekaterina Makarova vs Maria Kirilenko H2H: 3-2

Ekaterina Makarova holds a 3–2 lead over Maria Kirilenko in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Maria Kirilenko leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Ekaterina Makarova leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Ekaterina Makarova won the 2012 Beijing second round 6-3 6-3.

RUS Age 38 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
3 2
5 main draw meetings
RUS Age 39 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 3, 2012* Beijing WTA 1000 R64 Hard Ekaterina Makarova #20 6-3 6-3 Maria Kirilenko #15 Match data
May 10, 2012* Madrid WTA 1000 R32 Clay Ekaterina Makarova #41 6-4 6-4 Maria Kirilenko #19 Match data
Aug 31, 2011* US Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Maria Kirilenko #29 4-6 6-1 7-6(3) Ekaterina Makarova #44 Match data
May 9, 2009* Estoril WTA 250 QF Clay Ekaterina Makarova #43 5-7 6-2 6-2 Maria Kirilenko #37 Match data
Feb 20, 2008* Doha WTA 1000 R64 Hard Maria Kirilenko #26 6-3 5-7 6-0 Ekaterina Makarova #80 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Ekaterina Makarova #1,000 #8 3,620 1,940 248 222 52.8% 0 0 0 2 1 3
Maria Kirilenko #947 #10 3,471 1,910 282 228 55.3% 0 0 0 2 4 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Ekaterina Makarova Maria Kirilenko
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 2002 0–3 0.0% #373 1,479 0 0
16 2003 5–5 50.0% #124 1,522 0 0
17 2004 8–9 47.1% #107 1,575 0 0
18 2005 29–21 58.0% #25 1,741 0 1
19 2007 2–2 50.0% #110 1,536 0 0 2006 23–25 47.9% #30 1,656 0 1
20 2008 17–20 45.9% #46 1,626 0 0 2007 28–26 51.9% #25 1,739 0 2
21 2009 19–22 46.3% #60 1,634 0 0 2008 34–22 60.7% #29 1,722 0 5
22 2010 14–20 41.2% #49 1,662 0 1 2009 21–24 46.7% #62 1,719 0 5
23 2011 15–23 39.5% #53 1,604 0 1 2010 37–23 61.7% #20 1,827 0 5
24 2012 26–19 57.8% #20 1,757 0 1 2011 29–23 55.8% #28 1,816 0 5
25 2013 24–18 57.1% #24 1,838 0 1 2012 29–20 59.2% #14 1,775 0 5
26 2014 39–21 65.0% #11 1,837 0 2 2013 34–18 65.4% #19 1,786 0 6
27 2015 26–16 61.9% #23 1,784 0 2 2014 5–9 35.7% #187 1,698 0 6
28 2016 23–18 56.1% #30 1,782 0 2
29 2017 27–21 56.2% #33 1,836 0 3
30 2018 16–19 45.7% #57 1,750 0 3
31 2019 0–3 0.0% #997 1,700 0 3