H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Ekaterina Makarova vs Nadia Petrova H2H: 4-2

Ekaterina Makarova holds a 4–2 lead over Nadia Petrova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Ekaterina Makarova leads 3–1 on hard courts, while they are tied 1–1 on grass. Most recently, Ekaterina Makarova won the 2012 Cincinnati second round 7-6(8) 3-1 RET.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Ekaterina Makarova
RUS Age 38 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
4 – 2
6 main draw meetings
Nadia Petrova
RUS Age 44 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 15, 2012* Cincinnati WTA 1000 R64 Hard Ekaterina Makarova #44 7-6(8) 3-1 (ret.) Nadia Petrova #21 Match data
Jan 23, 2011* Australian Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Ekaterina Makarova #49 6-2 3-6 8-6 Nadia Petrova #15 Match data
Jun 18, 2010* Eastbourne WTA 500 R16 Grass Ekaterina Makarova #100 6-2 6-0 Nadia Petrova #13 Match data
Mar 26, 2009* Miami WTA 1000 R32 Hard Ekaterina Makarova #54 7-5 6-1 Nadia Petrova #9 Match data
Jun 21, 2008* Eastbourne WTA 500 QF Grass Nadia Petrova #22 6-4 6-3 Ekaterina Makarova #62 Match data
Jan 20, 2008* Australian Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Nadia Petrova #14 6-1 7-6(8) Ekaterina Makarova #110 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Ekaterina Makarova #1,000 #8 3,620 1,940 248 222 52.8% 0 0 0 2 1 3
Nadia Petrova #578 #3 3,882 2,077 441 276 61.5% 0 3 1 7 2 13

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Ekaterina Makarova Nadia Petrova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1998 2–2 50.0% #145 1,536 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1999 3–5 37.5% #93 1,568 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2000 12–15 44.4% #60 1,624 0 0
19 2007 2–2 50.0% #110 1,536 0 0 2001 20–21 48.8% #39 1,682 0 0
20 2008 17–20 45.9% #46 1,626 0 0 2002 7–5 58.3% #112 1,758 0 0
21 2009 19–22 46.3% #60 1,634 0 0 2003 36–20 64.3% #12 1,924 0 0
22 2010 14–20 41.2% #49 1,662 0 1 2004 39–24 61.9% #12 1,880 0 0
23 2011 15–23 39.5% #53 1,604 0 1 2005 56–25 69.1% #9 1,945 0 1
24 2012 26–19 57.8% #20 1,757 0 1 2006 48–19 71.6% #6 1,990 0 6
25 2013 24–18 57.1% #24 1,838 0 1 2007 37–18 67.3% #14 1,931 0 7
26 2014 39–21 65.0% #11 1,837 0 2 2008 47–24 66.2% #11 1,923 0 9
27 2015 26–16 61.9% #23 1,784 0 2 2009 30–21 58.8% #20 1,821 0 9
28 2016 23–18 56.1% #30 1,782 0 2 2010 32–20 61.5% #15 1,828 0 9
29 2017 27–21 56.2% #33 1,836 0 3 2011 25–21 54.3% #29 1,781 0 10
30 2018 16–19 45.7% #57 1,750 0 3 2012 37–18 67.3% #12 1,917 0 13
31 2019 0–3 0.0% #997 1,700 0 3 2013 9–13 40.9% #104 1,718 0 13
32 — — — — — — — 2014 1–5 16.7% #362 1,648 0 13