H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Ekaterina Makarova vs Olga Govortsova H2H: 0-2
Olga Govortsova holds a 2–0 lead over Ekaterina Makarova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Olga Govortsova leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Olga Govortsova won the 2009 Cincinnati second round 6-1 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 38
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
BLR
Age 37
Right-Handed
182 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 12, 2009* | Cincinnati | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Olga Govortsova | 6-1 6-3 | Ekaterina Makarova | Match data |
| Jul 17, 2009* | Palermo | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Olga Govortsova | 6-2 6-2 | Ekaterina Makarova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ekaterina Makarova | #1,000 | #8 | 3,620 | 1,940 | 248 | 222 | 52.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
| Olga Govortsova | #1,276 | #35 | 1,510 | 1,705 | 123 | 186 | 39.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ekaterina Makarova | Olga Govortsova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #337 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #48 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2007 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #110 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #47 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2008 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #46 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #50 | 1,693 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2009 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #60 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 13–27 | 32.5% | #75 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2010 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #49 | 1,662 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 6–19 | 24.0% | #111 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2011 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #53 | 1,604 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #57 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2012 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #20 | 1,757 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #93 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2013 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #24 | 1,838 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #149 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2014 | 39–21 | 65.0% | #11 | 1,837 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #71 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2015 | 26–16 | 61.9% | #23 | 1,784 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 2–11 | 15.4% | #170 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2016 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #30 | 1,782 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #320 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2017 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #33 | 1,836 | 0 | 3 | 2018 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #393 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2018 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #57 | 1,750 | 0 | 3 | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #192 | 1,451 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2019 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #997 | 1,700 | 0 | 3 | 2020 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #134 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #139 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |