H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Elena Bovina vs Claudine Schaul H2H: 1-1
Elena Bovina and Claudine Schaul are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Elena Bovina leads 1–0 on carpet, while Claudine Schaul leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Elena Bovina won the 2004 Moscow fourth round 7-5 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 43
Right-Handed
189 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
LUX
Age 42
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 15, 2004* | Moscow | WTA 1000 | R16 | Carpet | Elena Bovina | 7-5 6-3 | Claudine Schaul | Match data |
| Jan 23, 2004* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Claudine Schaul | 6-4 6-3 | Elena Bovina | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elena Bovina | #777 | #14 | 1,758 | 1,960 | 127 | 110 | 53.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Claudine Schaul | #1,188 | #41 | 767 | 1,675 | 27 | 48 | 36.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Elena Bovina | Claudine Schaul | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #339 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2000 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #133 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #260 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2001 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #49 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #133 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2002 | 29–19 | 60.4% | #26 | 1,803 | 0 | 2 | 2003 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #80 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2003 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #21 | 1,831 | 0 | 2 | 2004 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #61 | 1,562 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2004 | 37–18 | 67.3% | #15 | 1,951 | 0 | 3 | 2005 | 4–15 | 21.1% | #174 | 1,474 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2005 | 12–8 | 60.0% | #61 | 1,908 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #1431 | 1,862 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2007 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #329 | 1,757 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2008 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #186 | 1,756 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2009 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #210 | 1,728 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2010 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #162 | 1,653 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2011 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #301 | 1,599 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |