H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Elena Bovina vs Eleni Daniilidou H2H: 3-1
Elena Bovina holds a 3–1 lead over Eleni Daniilidou in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Elena Bovina leads 2–0 on clay, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Elena Bovina won the 2005 Berlin third round 7-5 5-7 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 43
Right-Handed
189 cm / 6'2"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
GRE
Age 43
Right-Handed
182 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 5, 2005* | Berlin | WTA 1000 | R32 | Clay | Elena Bovina | 7-5 5-7 6-1 | Eleni Daniilidou | Match data |
| Jul 29, 2004* | San Diego | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Elena Bovina | 6-1 6-4 | Eleni Daniilidou | Match data |
| Apr 11, 2002* | Estoril | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Elena Bovina | 6-4 7-6(5) | Eleni Daniilidou | Match data |
| Oct 18, 2001* | Bratislava | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Eleni Daniilidou | 6-1 2-6 6-2 | Elena Bovina | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elena Bovina | #777 | #14 | 1,758 | 1,960 | 127 | 110 | 53.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Eleni Daniilidou | #1,070 | #14 | 1,639 | 1,878 | 185 | 203 | 47.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Elena Bovina | Eleni Daniilidou | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2000 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #133 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2001 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #49 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #81 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2002 | 29–19 | 60.4% | #26 | 1,803 | 0 | 2 | 2002 | 32–22 | 59.3% | #22 | 1,778 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 2003 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #21 | 1,831 | 0 | 2 | 2003 | 32–24 | 57.1% | #26 | 1,706 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 2004 | 37–18 | 67.3% | #15 | 1,951 | 0 | 3 | 2004 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #34 | 1,683 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 2005 | 12–8 | 60.0% | #61 | 1,908 | 0 | 3 | 2005 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #69 | 1,638 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #1431 | 1,862 | 0 | 3 | 2006 | 27–24 | 52.9% | #36 | 1,720 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 2007 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #329 | 1,757 | 0 | 3 | 2007 | 27–29 | 48.2% | #42 | 1,720 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 2008 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #186 | 1,756 | 0 | 3 | 2008 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #144 | 1,700 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 2009 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #210 | 1,728 | 0 | 3 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #157 | 1,677 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 2010 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #162 | 1,653 | 0 | 3 | 2010 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #165 | 1,666 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 2011 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #301 | 1,599 | 0 | 3 | 2011 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #90 | 1,566 | 0 | 5 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 8–21 | 27.6% | #100 | 1,483 | 0 | 5 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #186 | 1,431 | 0 | 5 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #414 | 1,412 | 0 | 5 |