H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Elena Bovina vs Mashona Washington H2H: 2-0
Elena Bovina holds a 2–0 lead over Mashona Washington in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Elena Bovina leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Elena Bovina won the 2005 Rome second round 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 43
Right-Handed
189 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 50
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 11, 2005* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Elena Bovina | 6-2 6-2 | Mashona Washington | Match data |
| Aug 28, 2004* | New Haven | WTA 500 | QF | Hard | Elena Bovina | 6-3 6-2 | Mashona Washington | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elena Bovina | #777 | #14 | 1,758 | 1,960 | 127 | 110 | 53.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Mashona Washington | #990 | #50 | 676 | 1,647 | 42 | 76 | 35.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Elena Bovina | Mashona Washington | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2000 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #133 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2001 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #49 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #407 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2002 | 29–19 | 60.4% | #26 | 1,803 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2003 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #21 | 1,831 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2004 | 37–18 | 67.3% | #15 | 1,951 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2005 | 12–8 | 60.0% | #61 | 1,908 | 0 | 3 | 1998 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #165 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #1431 | 1,862 | 0 | 3 | 1999 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #130 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2007 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #329 | 1,757 | 0 | 3 | 2000 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #142 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2008 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #186 | 1,756 | 0 | 3 | 2001 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #134 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2009 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #210 | 1,728 | 0 | 3 | 2002 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #109 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2010 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #162 | 1,653 | 0 | 3 | 2003 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #199 | 1,441 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2011 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #301 | 1,599 | 0 | 3 | 2004 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #53 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #73 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #230 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #309 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #364 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |