H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Elena Bovina vs Shinobu Asagoe H2H: 1-2
Shinobu Asagoe holds a 2–1 lead over Elena Bovina in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Shinobu Asagoe leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Elena Bovina won the 2005 Doha third round 7-5 7-6(6).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 43
Right-Handed
189 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
JPN
Age 50
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 24, 2005* | Doha | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Elena Bovina | 7-5 7-6(6) | Shinobu Asagoe | Match data |
| Jun 12, 2003* | Birmingham | WTA 250 | R32 | Grass | Shinobu Asagoe | 6-3 6-3 | Elena Bovina | Match data |
| Aug 13, 2001 | Toronto | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Shinobu Asagoe | 6-7(2) 6-3 6-4 | Elena Bovina | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elena Bovina | #777 | #14 | 1,758 | 1,960 | 127 | 110 | 53.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Shinobu Asagoe | #215 | #21 | 1,254 | 1,769 | 95 | 119 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Elena Bovina | Shinobu Asagoe | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2000 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #133 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2001 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #49 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2002 | 29–19 | 60.4% | #26 | 1,803 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2003 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #21 | 1,831 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2004 | 37–18 | 67.3% | #15 | 1,951 | 0 | 3 | 1997 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #158 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2005 | 12–8 | 60.0% | #61 | 1,908 | 0 | 3 | 1998 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #157 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #1431 | 1,862 | 0 | 3 | 1999 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #122 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2007 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #329 | 1,757 | 0 | 3 | 2000 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #72 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2008 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #186 | 1,756 | 0 | 3 | 2001 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #108 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2009 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #210 | 1,728 | 0 | 3 | 2002 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #96 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2010 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #162 | 1,653 | 0 | 3 | 2003 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #45 | 1,666 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2011 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #301 | 1,599 | 0 | 3 | 2004 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #37 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #38 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #215 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |