H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Elena Bovina vs Tatiana Golovin H2H: 2-1
Elena Bovina holds a 2–1 lead over Tatiana Golovin in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Elena Bovina leads 2–0 on clay, while Tatiana Golovin leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Elena Bovina won the 2005 Roland Garros third round 6-3 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 43
Right-Handed
189 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 38
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 28, 2005* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R32 | Clay | Elena Bovina | 6-3 7-5 | Tatiana Golovin | Match data |
| Mar 26, 2005* | Miami | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Tatiana Golovin | 6-3 7-6(4) | Elena Bovina | Match data |
| May 28, 2003* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Elena Bovina | 6-4 6-1 | Tatiana Golovin | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elena Bovina | #777 | #14 | 1,758 | 1,960 | 127 | 110 | 53.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Tatiana Golovin | #1,128 | #12 | 1,882 | 2,012 | 131 | 80 | 62.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Elena Bovina | Tatiana Golovin | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #358 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 27–15 | 64.3% | #27 | 1,753 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2000 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #133 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #24 | 1,771 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2001 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #49 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #22 | 1,830 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2002 | 29–19 | 60.4% | #26 | 1,803 | 0 | 2 | 2007 | 43–17 | 71.7% | #13 | 1,981 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 2003 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #21 | 1,831 | 0 | 2 | 2008 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #254 | 1,890 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 2004 | 37–18 | 67.3% | #15 | 1,951 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2005 | 12–8 | 60.0% | #61 | 1,908 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #1431 | 1,862 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2007 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #329 | 1,757 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2008 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #186 | 1,756 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2009 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #210 | 1,728 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2010 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #162 | 1,653 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2011 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #301 | 1,599 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |