H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Elena Vesnina vs Agnieszka Radwanska H2H: 1-5

Agnieszka Radwanska holds a 5–1 lead over Elena Vesnina in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Agnieszka Radwanska leads 4–0 on hard courts, while Elena Vesnina leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Agnieszka Radwanska won the 2014 Miami third round 7-5 6-3.

RUS Age 39 Right-Handed 176 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 5
6 main draw meetings
POL Age 37 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 20, 2014* Miami WTA 1000 R32 Hard Agnieszka Radwanska #3 7-5 6-3 Elena Vesnina #35 Match data
Aug 16, 2013* Cincinnati WTA 1000 R16 Hard Agnieszka Radwanska #4 6-0 6-2 Elena Vesnina #23 Match data
Jan 5, 2013* Auckland WTA 250 QF Hard Agnieszka Radwanska #4 6-3 6-3 Elena Vesnina #68 Match data
Jun 29, 2012* Wimbledon Grand Slam R64 Grass Agnieszka Radwanska #3 6-2 6-1 Elena Vesnina #79 Match data
Aug 8, 2011 Toronto WTA 1000 R64 Hard Agnieszka Radwanska #12 6-4 6-1 Elena Vesnina #38 Match data
May 12, 2011* Rome WTA 1000 R32 Clay Elena Vesnina #41 3-6 6-2 6-1 Agnieszka Radwanska #11 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Elena Vesnina #573 #13 3,320 1,858 262 260 50.2% 0 1 0 1 1 3
Agnieszka Radwanska #74 #2 8,530 2,081 506 237 68.1% 0 5 1 8 6 20

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Elena Vesnina Agnieszka Radwanska
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2004 0–1 0.0% #259 1,485 0 0 2006 11–8 57.9% #61 1,673 0 0
18 2005 6–6 50.0% #106 1,511 0 0 2007 27–19 58.7% #26 1,808 0 1
19 2006 20–24 45.5% #47 1,617 0 0 2008 51–19 72.9% #10 1,926 0 4
20 2007 17–21 44.7% #54 1,631 0 0 2009 44–23 65.7% #10 1,910 0 4
21 2008 12–19 38.7% #79 1,558 0 0 2010 32–18 64.0% #14 1,860 0 4
22 2009 31–20 60.8% #23 1,767 0 0 2011 46–18 71.9% #8 1,979 0 7
23 2010 22–22 50.0% #52 1,720 0 0 2012 59–19 75.6% #4 1,994 0 10
24 2011 19–21 47.5% #57 1,689 0 0 2013 56–20 73.7% #5 1,957 0 13
25 2012 14–17 45.2% #68 1,701 0 0 2014 43–22 66.2% #6 1,872 0 14
26 2013 30–19 61.2% #25 1,801 0 2 2015 50–22 69.4% #5 1,957 0 17
27 2014 16–17 48.5% #64 1,689 0 2 2016 51–18 73.9% #3 1,942 0 20
28 2015 11–17 39.3% #115 1,609 0 2 2017 25–18 58.1% #28 1,812 0 20
29 2016 28–16 63.6% #16 1,778 0 2 2018 11–13 45.8% #74 1,727 0 20
30 2017 25–26 49.0% #18 1,691 0 3
31 2018 8–11 42.1% #137 1,679 0 3
34 2021 3–3 50.0% #310 1,689 0 3