H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Eleni Daniilidou vs Emilie Loit H2H: 2-1
Eleni Daniilidou holds a 2–1 lead over Emilie Loit in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Emilie Loit leads 1–0 on carpet, while Eleni Daniilidou leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Emilie Loit won the 2007 Paris third round 7-6(7) 6-7(1) 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GRE
Age 43
Right-Handed
182 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 47
Left-Handed
167 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 8, 2007* | Paris | WTA 500 | R32 | Carpet | Emilie Loit | 7-6(7) 6-7(1) 6-4 | Eleni Daniilidou | Match data |
| Sep 13, 2002* | Bahia | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Eleni Daniilidou | 4-6 6-2 7-5 | Emilie Loit | Match data |
| Apr 5, 2002* | Oporto | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Eleni Daniilidou | 6-1 6-1 | Emilie Loit | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eleni Daniilidou | #1,070 | #14 | 1,639 | 1,878 | 185 | 203 | 47.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Emilie Loit | #161 | #27 | 1,016 | 1,780 | 162 | 180 | 47.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Eleni Daniilidou | Emilie Loit | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2001 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #81 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #243 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2002 | 32–22 | 59.3% | #22 | 1,778 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #96 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2003 | 32–24 | 57.1% | #26 | 1,706 | 0 | 2 | 1999 | 3–15 | 16.7% | #101 | 1,424 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2004 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #34 | 1,683 | 0 | 3 | 2000 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #101 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2005 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #69 | 1,638 | 0 | 3 | 2001 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #95 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2006 | 27–24 | 52.9% | #36 | 1,720 | 0 | 4 | 2002 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #58 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2007 | 27–29 | 48.2% | #42 | 1,720 | 0 | 4 | 2003 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #41 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2008 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #144 | 1,700 | 0 | 5 | 2004 | 29–20 | 59.2% | #45 | 1,651 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #157 | 1,677 | 0 | 5 | 2005 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #82 | 1,546 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2010 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #165 | 1,666 | 0 | 5 | 2006 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #56 | 1,621 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2011 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #90 | 1,566 | 0 | 5 | 2007 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #43 | 1,609 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2012 | 8–21 | 27.6% | #100 | 1,483 | 0 | 5 | 2008 | 5–15 | 25.0% | #137 | 1,513 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2013 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #186 | 1,431 | 0 | 5 | 2009 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #161 | 1,531 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 2014 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #414 | 1,412 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |