H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Eleni Daniilidou vs Sofia Arvidsson H2H: 1-2
Sofia Arvidsson holds a 2–1 lead over Eleni Daniilidou in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Sofia Arvidsson leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Sofia Arvidsson won the 2012 Indian Wells first round 6-4 7-6(4).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GRE
Age 43
Right-Handed
182 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
SWE
Age 42
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 6, 2012* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R128 | Hard | Sofia Arvidsson | 6-4 7-6(4) | Eleni Daniilidou | Match data |
| Sep 21, 2006* | Beijing | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Eleni Daniilidou | 6-4 6-1 | Sofia Arvidsson | Match data |
| May 25, 2005* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Sofia Arvidsson | 6-1 7-6(1) | Eleni Daniilidou | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eleni Daniilidou | #1,070 | #14 | 1,639 | 1,878 | 185 | 203 | 47.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Sofia Arvidsson | #320 | #29 | 1,380 | 1,775 | 113 | 154 | 42.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Eleni Daniilidou | Sofia Arvidsson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #437 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2001 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #81 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #144 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2002 | 32–22 | 59.3% | #22 | 1,778 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #104 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2003 | 32–24 | 57.1% | #26 | 1,706 | 0 | 2 | 2004 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #213 | 1,434 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2004 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #34 | 1,683 | 0 | 3 | 2005 | 13–8 | 61.9% | #67 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2005 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #69 | 1,638 | 0 | 3 | 2006 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #62 | 1,537 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2006 | 27–24 | 52.9% | #36 | 1,720 | 0 | 4 | 2007 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #98 | 1,508 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2007 | 27–29 | 48.2% | #42 | 1,720 | 0 | 4 | 2008 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #56 | 1,519 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2008 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #144 | 1,700 | 0 | 5 | 2009 | 0–8 | 0.0% | #139 | 1,443 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #157 | 1,677 | 0 | 5 | 2010 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #53 | 1,545 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2010 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #165 | 1,666 | 0 | 5 | 2011 | 16–23 | 41.0% | #78 | 1,627 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2011 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #90 | 1,566 | 0 | 5 | 2012 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #41 | 1,753 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2012 | 8–21 | 27.6% | #100 | 1,483 | 0 | 5 | 2013 | 6–18 | 25.0% | #120 | 1,597 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2013 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #186 | 1,431 | 0 | 5 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #263 | 1,581 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2014 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #414 | 1,412 | 0 | 5 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #320 | 1,568 | 0 | 2 |