H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 22:32 UTC
Elina Svitolina vs Beatriz Garcia Vidagany H2H: 1-0
Elina Svitolina holds a 1–0 lead over Beatriz Garcia Vidagany in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Elina Svitolina leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Elina Svitolina won the 2014 Nuremberg fourth round 7-6(5) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
UKR
Age 31
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
Age 37
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 23, 2014* | Nuremberg | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Elina Svitolina | 7-6(5) 6-3 | Beatriz Garcia Vidagany | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elina Svitolina | #10 | #3 | 6,085 | 2,143 | 429 | 227 | 65.4% | 0 | 6 | 1 | 4 | 9 | 20 |
| Beatriz Garcia Vidagany | — | — | — | 1,562 | 7 | 10 | 41.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Elina Svitolina | Beatriz Garcia Vidagany | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2012 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #131 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2013 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #45 | 1,561 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2014 | 36–24 | 60.0% | #28 | 1,805 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2015 | 40–24 | 62.5% | #19 | 1,788 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2016 | 35–21 | 62.5% | #14 | 1,828 | 0 | 4 | 2010 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2017 | 50–15 | 76.9% | #6 | 1,942 | 0 | 9 | 2011 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2018 | 44–15 | 74.6% | #4 | 1,983 | 0 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2019 | 40–22 | 64.5% | #6 | 1,963 | 0 | 13 | 2013 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2020 | 19–8 | 70.4% | #5 | 1,928 | 0 | 15 | 2014 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2021 | 34–19 | 64.2% | #15 | 1,900 | 0 | 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2022 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #240 | 1,765 | 0 | 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2023 | 18–9 | 66.7% | #25 | 1,886 | 0 | 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2024 | 27–16 | 62.8% | #23 | 1,906 | 0 | 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2025 | 33–14 | 70.2% | #14 | 1,980 | 0 | 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2026 | 35–10 | 77.8% | #10 | 2,085 | 0 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |