H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC
Elina Svitolina vs Carina Witthoeft H2H: 1-0
Elina Svitolina holds a 1–0 lead over Carina Witthoeft in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Elina Svitolina leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Elina Svitolina won the 2017 Wimbledon third round 6-1 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
UKR
Age 31
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
GER
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 9, 2017* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R32 | Grass | Elina Svitolina | 6-1 7-5 | Carina Witthoeft | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elina Svitolina | #10 | #3 | 6,085 | 2,143 | 429 | 227 | 65.4% | 0 | 6 | 1 | 4 | 9 | 20 |
| Carina Witthoeft | #1,212 | #48 | 1,093 | 1,745 | 49 | 69 | 41.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Elina Svitolina | Carina Witthoeft | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2012 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #131 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #225 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #45 | 1,561 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #210 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 36–24 | 60.0% | #28 | 1,805 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #105 | 1,452 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 40–24 | 62.5% | #19 | 1,788 | 0 | 3 | 2015 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #64 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 35–21 | 62.5% | #14 | 1,828 | 0 | 4 | 2016 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #88 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 50–15 | 76.9% | #6 | 1,942 | 0 | 9 | 2017 | 22–14 | 61.1% | #51 | 1,745 | 0 | 1 |
| 2018 | 44–15 | 74.6% | #4 | 1,983 | 0 | 13 | 2018 | 5–18 | 21.7% | #170 | 1,543 | 0 | 1 |
| 2019 | 40–22 | 64.5% | #6 | 1,963 | 0 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2020 | 19–8 | 70.4% | #5 | 1,928 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 34–19 | 64.2% | #15 | 1,900 | 0 | 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #240 | 1,765 | 0 | 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 18–9 | 66.7% | #25 | 1,886 | 0 | 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 27–16 | 62.8% | #23 | 1,906 | 0 | 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 33–14 | 70.2% | #14 | 1,980 | 0 | 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 35–10 | 77.8% | #10 | 2,085 | 0 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |